charlie kirk, martyr

The algorithm will punish me financially for posting this piece. I know because it’s done so in the past for broaching a topic covered here. At this point, I don’t care. It’s time to take a stand. I can only hope you readers will stand with me.

When you tear out a mans tongue you are not proving him a liar, you are only telling the world that you fear what he might say.

George R. R. Martin

Late yesterday Charlie Kirk’s wife Erika released a statement. At the beginning of her statement she gracefully thanked everyone who had worked on the investigation to find a shooter. She went on to add,

The evil doers responsible for my husbands assassination have no idea what they have done. They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith and of Gods merciful love. If you thought my husbands mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea of what you have just unleashed across this entire country and this world. You have no idea. You have no idea the fire you have ignited in this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry. To everyone listening around America tonight, the movement my husband built will not die. It wont. I refuse to let that happen. All. of us will refuse to let that happen.

It’s apparent that she’s not buying into the official ‘lone gunman’ narrative. In fact, by using plural terminology she makes it clear that she believes multiple people were responsible.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk (31), the Christian founder of Turning Point USA was a tragic loss for the US. He had just begun to take questions at the first event of his American Come Back Tour at Utah Valley University when the bullet struck.

Because I’ve had some issues with one of his positions (the verboten topic, covered shortly), I’ve never followed him closely. But I’ve long admired his ability to calmly and intelligently debate political topics from a conservative, Christian viewpoint on college campuses across the country. I’ve watched many of those debates. While many on the left like to whine about having a civil dialogue, Charlie Kirk has been doing just that on college campuses since he was a teenager. It comes as no surprise that he has a huge following among Generation Z.

This is why it’s so important to come to terms with the ramifications of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This was much more than an attack on one individual. This was an attack on rights we hold sacred here in the US, our 1st Amendment right to free speech and our right to practice our chosen religion without persecution. More than anyone I know, Charlie Kirk embodied those rights.

In my mind this was also an attack on Gen Z. Where would the US be in 20 years if Charlie Kirk had been allowed to teach ever more Zoomers how to have civilized discussions about tough questions while weaving in the teachings of Jesus? He had already reached hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of Zoomers.

It appears some dark forces wanted to put a stop to all of that. And they certainly didn’t want to run the risk that Kirk would become so popular that he could take the White House in just a few more election cycles. Perhaps most importantly, those dark forces didn’t want to lose the future support of Gen Z. If that were to occur, those dark forces would fall from power as Gen Z came of age.

That may still happen.

We are being told that the shooter has been apprehended. The suspects name is Tyler Robinson, a 22 year old from Washington County, Utah, about 3.5 hours southwest of where the shooting occurred. For reasons I’ll get into shortly, I’m not buying the goods being sold to us by Cash Patel, the Governor of Utah and the other “authorities” parading in front of the cameras. As I’ll be pointing out, their story is full of holes.

To begin with, while Robinson may have been on the roof of the building behind the audience, they’ve not presented any evidence he ever shot a gun, let alone that a gun was shot from that roof.

There are a lot of questionable ancillary events and questions that support my position that he is nothing more than a patsy.

Before we get into that, in this day and age it’s necessary to ask if he was the victim of some sort of MKUltra program? If Tyler Robinson dies before he faces trial, then we can be sure he had handlers that helped make this assassination happen and that they didn’t want him to spill the beans in court. Will he be suicided while in jail?

If he makes it through trail safely and is convicted of the shooting, then we may have even bigger problems. Those will become clear as we go along.

In my mind one of the biggest questions is the fact that Kirk was shot shortly after he began answering the second question posed to him, about mass shootings in the US, a reference to the recent school shooting by a transgender. On the balcony above Charlie was a transgender flag. Why was he shot just as he began answering that question? Had that been arranged? Have the authorities queried the guy who asked him that question?

Then there was the early arrest of George Zinn, who screamed “Shoot me, shoot me!” as he was led away by the police. Was he supposed to be a patsy for the patsy Robinson, like Jack Ruby was for Lee Harvey Oswald - shoot the guy who appears to be guilty then kill the guy who shot him, all so the whole thing can be neatly swept under the rug while the architects of the event make their escape?

But he wasn’t shot. Did that part of the plan fail?

Zinn was later released. Will that prove to be a mistake? Will he turn up dead?

Then there was the private jet that left the Provo airport and disappeared from aviation tracking. Was the transponder turned off? I’ve not yet looked into this part of the story closely, but apparently the owner of that jet had once been a financial backer of Kirk. Were some of the architects of the assassination making their escape? Who was on that plane? Where did that plane go?

Then there was the conspicuous retrieval of a scoped, Mauser 30.06 bolt action rifle in the woods near the campus, wrapped in a towel and placed in a cardboard box along with one spent and 3 unspent cartridges, all of which had words scrawled on them. The spent cartridge, the one we are being told killed Kirk said, “notices, bulges, OWO what’s this?”. According to the New York Post “The words are reportedly used by role-playing sex groups online — and to troll people”. One of the unfired cartridges had these words on it “Hey fascist! Catch!” as well as an up arrow, a right arrow and three arrows pointing down. The New York Times said the arrows may be a reference to control arrows that deliver bombs on the video game Hell Divers II. The second unspent cartridge had the Italian words “O bella ciao, bella ciao, ciao, ciao”. These words are the title of a song often sung on April 29, Liberation Day in Italy, to commemorate the fall of the fascist Benito Mussolini.

side bar

This serves very nicely to highlight the confusion, especially among many younger people, about what fascism actually entails. Without going into detail, suffice it to say, Mussolini came from a Marxist/Socialist family. He then blended that with nationalism and corporatism to enslave all levels of society into a state controlled system. This meant the government took all the credit and all the profit. Everyone worked for the government - Mussolini.

Charlie Kirk has always advocated for the opposite; less government, more personal freedom, more entrepreneurial mom and pop businesses. He was the opposite of a fascist.

The third unfired cartridge was inscribed with the words, “If you found this you must be gay”.

One of the big problems with the case against Robinson is, none of the numerous photos released by authorities show him with a rifle, not in the stairwell, not on the roof, not jumping off the roof and running across the grass.

One of the questions I have is why there are not more videos being released? Modern campuses like this have hundreds of video cameras placed around the campus. Why are we only seeing a few videos?

Like many of us, Tyler Robinson grew up in a typical American family with guns. He was familiar with them. But if someone wanted to take advantage of him, knowledge of that upbringing would work to their advantage.

The venue the Utah Valley University provided to Charlie Kirk is a perfect kill box. It’s enclosed on all sides by buildings with the tallest ones being behind the audience, which is where we are told Robinson was caught on several different video cameras, none of which show him with a rifle. One of those is the video above.

There is also the question of what the two guys standing inside the security fence just behind and to the right of Charlie Kirk are doing with their hands. The guy with the white cap and the guy with the dark shirt both seem to be passing hand signals to someone in the back of the venue just before Kirk is shot.

I’ve looked at slow motion videos of Kirk being shot. They raise ballistics questions. I’m waiting to hear from someone with a lot more expertise before I comment on that.

This is the best analysis of the layout and potential location of the shooter I’ve been able to find so far. It shows someone on the roof, without a gun. Because this guy follows the official narrative about who, what, when and where, he fails to point out that the real shooter could be embedded in any number of other places in the vicinity of the person the authorities want us to think is the shooter (Robinson). If the real shooter is well hidden, he could have shot Kirk with Robinson being close enough to the source of the sound to make people think Robinson was responsible.

Were White Cap and Black Shirt passing hand signals to the real shooter about their patsy being in place, that the real shooter could take the shot?

When I first heard Charlie Kirk had been shot the first thing I thought of was his long term support of Israel and the prodigious amount of funding he’s received from Zionist sources. As I alluded earlier, that is what has kept me from following his work closely. More recently I heard that he’d been having second thoughts about Israel, so over the past few days I’ve looked into that more closely. It turns out, in recent months he had become fearful for his life due to his taking positions that question Israel, its war with Gaza and Trumps bombing of Iran.

Charlie recently began talking about this in interviews with Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson and others. I hope to put together a collection of those interviews soon.

Here is what Max Blumenthal over at the Gray Zone said about this.

Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.

Another character in this plot is the young conservative commentator and one of the cowardly leaders on J6, Nick Fuentes. For some time Fuentes and Kirk have been duking it out online over Israel. While I’m no fan of Fuentes, I do feel he was justified in calling out Kirk’s massive funding from Zionist sources and until recently, Kirk’s lack of criticism of Israeli war crimes. One of those Zionist funders may have been in the plane that turned its transponder off shortly after leaving Provo.

On 9/12 Kim Iversen pointed out that the terminology found on the cartridges is also commonly used in the gaming community. She also pointed out that Fuentes and his merry band of groypers (his followers) also use the same terminology.

Whats going on here?

Here is how Kim described all of this.

She found a photo of Robinson sitting at a computer playing a game, so he could be a gamer. We know his family is religious and we know Fuentes claims to be Christian. If Robinson is a Christian gamer (oxymoron’s abound in ALL of this) she thought we need to ask if he follows Fuentes.

She wasn’t trying to foist any blame for Kirk’s death on Fuentes, but she was saying maybe someone else is. Kim also looked into information provided by Patel that Robinson used Discord. While she was talking about Discord she got an update from Discord saying they had no one by the name of Tyler Robinson registered with them.

Was FBI director Patel lying or was this just really sloppy investigative work by him?

what does all of this mean?

Bear with me here.

The Christian conservative Kirk has been taken out. If conservative Fuentes is being set up for a fall, then we need to understand that two of the most popular conservative voices in the US may be taken out in one fell swoop. That means we have to consider who stands to benefit from both Kirk and Fuentes being removed from the picture.

Well… guess who announced on 9/12 they are going to replace Kirk’s tour on college campuses. The ultra Zionist Ben Shapiro. So, Kirk who was turning against Israel and was recently taken to task by Shapiro for doing so, is now gone. Fuentes, who has long criticized Israel, may also be effectively taken out of the picture. This means the Israel-first voice of Ben Shapiro will become the conservative voice of Gen Z.

For the past few days Shapiro has been capitalizing on Kirk’s death, fawning over him like some long, beloved friend. Don’t be fooled.

All of this reeks of a plot by Israel to take out two America-first critics of Israel and replace them with their Israel-first man, Ben Shapiro. If this happens, look for Israel to gain even more control of the US.

Is this the “they” Erika Kirk was referring to? She said the current America Comeback Tour will continue. Who will be taking Charlies place?

Be free.