confirmation - there is no spike protein

update - arizona election fraud

…literature shows that PEG lipid nanoparticles are the most toxic material on earth. Dr. Stefano Scoglio

Regular readers know I’ve written extensively about the PEGylated nanotechnology involved in constructing the Trojan horse used in the mRNA covid jabs. Here’s the most recent post on this topic.

A reader recently pointed me to this interview of Dr. Stefano Scoglio by Torsten Englebrecht. Dr. Scoglio provides a fresh and very detialed perspective on all of the scientific fraud surrounding the covid jabs. For years Dr. Scoglio has been speaking out about this in Italy but this is his first interview with international coverage.

While it seems he has not come across some of the information I’ve reported about here that verifies the existence of graphene oxide in the coivd jabs, I nevertheless found Dr. Scoglios questioning the existence of the spike protein and the fraudulent nature of antibody testing very compelling. What follows is my attempt to distill his primary points in that interview.

why have no protein tests been done to verify the presence of spike proteins?

Testing blood for proteins is a commonly used diagnostic tool. For example, the C-reactive protein (produced by the liver) test is used to determine levels of inflammation. (Excessive levels of cortisol also causes inflammation.) Why are protein tests not used to determine the presence of the so called ‘spike protein’ in someones blood?

Instead, round-about antibody tests are used to determine if spike proteins are present. Antibodies are produced in response to the presence of antigens. In other words, if what is claimed to be antibodies for the spike protein are found, then the claim is made that the body is producing spike proteins in response to the mRNA injections. There are several major problems with antibody tests.

But first, these definitions from the Cleveland Clinic.

Antigen vs antibody

An antigen is a foreign substance that enters your body. This can include bacteria, viruses, fungi, allergens, venom and other various toxins. An antibody is a protein produced by your immune system to attack and fight off these antigens.

Another term that can be used is immunogens - something that causes an immune response. Either one of these terms can be applied to the numerous “toxins” in the jabs.

If the spike protein actually existed it would also be an antigen. But as I pointed out in the prevous link, researchers have yet to find any nitrogen or phosphorous in any of the jab vials. These two elements must be present for there to be biological life. The question about the existence of spike proteins in the mRNA jabs becomes more apparent as we proceed.

As for Cleveland Clinics description, regular readers know I have problems with the theroy of viruses as “foreign” invaders and some of you may recall from my conversation with Dr. Tom Cowan that he has issues with the idea of the existence of an “immune system”. Let’s put aside those problems. The important information is the definition of antigens and antibodies.

antibody test problems

Antibody tests for the spike protein are performed in labs by testing the blood of jabbed people for “antibodies to the spike protein”. This is ridiculous because the blood of a vaccinated person will be awash with antibodies due to all the antigens (toxins) in the jabs. Furthermore, antibodies are not disease specific. According to Dr. Scoglio, “Antibodies are universal.”

If an antibody specific to the covid spike protein exists, a controlled experiment should be performed to determine if that particular antibody is responsible. In other words, the blood from a large group of people who have not been jabbed with mRNA Covid jabs but have been injected with some other toxic “vaccine” (the control group) should have the same antibody test as an equally large group people who have been jabbed with covid shots. A comparison should then be made between the two groups. If one group has one type of antibody and the other has another type of antibody, further controlled experiments need to be done to drill down to the sources and causes. None of this has ever been done. Ideally, these controlled experiments should be done for all “vaccines”. Yet, it hasn’t been done for any any - ever.

To add insult to an already asinine situation, no one has ever taken blood from a vaccinated person and isolated the spike protein from that blood.

Why not?

Another glaring problem with antibody tests is that there are only 5 types of antibodies (aka immunoglobulins); IgA, IgD, IgG, IgE, and IgM. Each one of those plays different roles in attacking foreign intrusions into our bodies and all of them combined make up our entire antibody defense system. No Virginia, there are not thousands of specific antibodies paired to every one of the thousands of diseases with which humans are inflicted.

The Cleveland Clinic again.

Where are antibodies produced?

Antibodies are produced by B cells (specialized white blood cells). When an antigen comes into contact with a B cell, it causes the B cell to divide and clone. These cloned B cells — or plasma cells — release millions of antibodies into your bloodstream and lymph system.

Antibodies are located in various areas of your body, including your skin, lungs, tears, saliva and even breast milk. In fact, high amounts of antibodies are present in colostrum (a thick fluid secreted by the breasts for a few days after giving birth). That’s why breastfeeding (chestfeeding) can boost your baby’s immune system.

As soon as an intrusion occurs, whether it comes from nature or the toxins in a jab, antibodies go to work in a nanosecond. In other words, any of the 5 antibodies can be made present in healthy people at something less than the drop of a hat.

All of this means that the use of an antibody test to determine the presence of a spike protein is a complete farce. Of course this would also apply to specific antibodies we are told are produced by any other jab product.

The idea that antigens like aluminum (and previously mercury) that serve as adjuvants in “vaccines” have to be included in jabs as to crank up an antibody (immune) response is a load of bull hooey. By their very nature, the numerous toxins in the covid jabs are all antigens and serve as adjuvants. This explains why so many people had immediate negative reactions to the covid jabs.

where are the spike proteins?

Given that hundreds of millions of people have now been jabbed with mRNA spike proteins, the world should now be awash with spike proteins. And yet, no spike protein has ever been collected from the blood of a jabbed person.

Why not?

It’s glaringly evident that the reason why simple protein tests are not used to determine the presence of spike proteins is because they don’t exist in nature - they exist only as a recombinant (synthetic) lab creation.

“These vaccines are just toxic bombs.” Dr. Scoglio.

You can order Dr. Scoglios book here.

kari lake election lawsuit

Previously I wrote about Kari Lake going to court over her questionable loss to Democrat Katie Hobbs. As promised, here is an update on her case.

This case is centered on the questionable election practices in Maricopa county, Arizona’s most populated county and home to the greater Phoenix area.

The margin of victory for Hobbs was 17,117. That’s a .6% difference.

What’s important to keep in mind in this case is that Hobbs retained her position as Arizona Secretary of State until she was sworn in as governor. As Secretary of State she was in charge of elections.

The evidence brought forth in the trial is very damming to those in charge of the vote verification and counting process. One of the major points of contention is that 274,000 of the 1.3 million mail-in ballots that were cast had to be signature verified. Because signature verification is done on computers, the average time spent on verification of each signature can be tracked. Amazingly, it was 3 seconds per ballot. 70,000 were verified in 2 seconds each.

A security video shows one of the signature verifiers authorizing signatures as fast as he can click through them - about 1 second per ballot. In the video you can see what looks like a bald guy on the left, authorizing 71 signatures in a little over a minute while the person next to him has only authorized 9. By himself, this guy authorized over 27,000 ballots.

The rate of signature approval was 99.7%. Needless to say, expecting an accurate approval rate when the average time spent on each ballot was less than 3 seconds is ludicrous.

Another big question is why were verifiers sent home early with piles of ballots remaining to be verified? One whistleblower testified that during the primary election they all worked the full amount of time, right up to the last minute of the last day. She said the time allotted for the general election was cut short, that they were told to go home at noon on Tuesday the 14th with the last full day being the following Wednesday.

Numerous names and addresses were mysteriously added to the voter history that didn’t match any signatures. The verifiers often complained about this and the manager told them to give them to him.

They were also told that the remaining unverified ballots would be completed at the county recorders office by regular staff - which at that time was still under the jurisdiction of Katie Hobbs. This whistle blower thought that was odd because where she and her colleagues worked was under the constant scrutiny of observers while the county recorders office has no observers.