covid kill shots - the largest mass genocide in the history of man?

have the jabs killed 13 times more people than the hitler’s holocaust?

Late update. It seems I have fallen prey to the FDA slight-of-hand used to announce approval of the Pfizer jab. As I’ve pointed out in early posts, the Pfizer jab is a collaboration between Pfizer and Biontech. It seems the Pfizer jab remains unapproved. Apparently, what has been approved is a separate jab made by Biontech. Dr. Robert Malone recently explained this on Bannons War Room. It also looks as if the Biontech jab may not be ready for prime time for some time. Unfortunately, this makes some of the piece that follows a bit premature. However, it remains pertinent for the near future. I’ll fill you in on more of this tomorrow. Bedtime for bonzo.

——————————————————————————————————————

Welcome new subscribers. If you’re new here, subscriptions are free.

FDA approval of Pfizer’s covid kill shot has set in motion a number of things, not the least of which is the impact it has on the ability of corporations and government officials with Nazi aspirations to begin implementing mandatory jabs on a much bigger scale. The impact of this is far reaching. For instance, it means that more airlines will now be imposing travel restrictions for those who haven’t taken the kill shot.

Previously, some corporate and government entities were holding off on a vaxx mandate due to the fact that all of the covid jabs were classified as experimental - none had been approved by the FDA. Recent FDA approval of Pfizer’s kill shot takes away one of the legal hurdles that some airlines and corporations had with denying the right to travel and work to those who refused to submit to participating in a medical experiment. However, the ultimate hurdle remains intact - it’s still a violation of our Constitutional rights and our rights under the Nuremberg Code, which was established after the Nuremberg trials shortly after WWII.

What follows are some of the most pertinent of the ten principles of the Nuremberg Code (not numerical order).

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Without question, all of these Nuremberg Code principles are being blatantly violated by those who are imposing the plandemic upon us.

the true healing conference

One of the ramifications of FDA approval of the Pfizer kill shot is that the upcoming True Healing Conference (THC), (announced here two weeks ago), which was to be held in Jacksonville, Florida, has been forced to forgo its in-person format due to the fact that the none of the speakers and attendees have taken, nor will they take the kill shot. Hence, some will be restricted from traveling to the THC conference. This, of course, highlights one of the ways that FDA approval of the kill shot takes away our rights as free Americans. (I’ve mentioned this several times before, but it bears repeating - the FDA must go away.)

THC will now be completely online. The good news is, this has caused the price to drop to just $100, which opens the door to many more participants. For an extra $50 you’ll get a digital download of all of the transcripts. Given the line-up for this conference and the cutting edge information that will be presented, the transcript alone is bound to be a valuable asset in the months and years to come - I’m looking forward to getting mine. Go here for more info.

a bit of backstory

I’ve mentioned in earlier posts that I’m a vaccine injured person. As a child I was given 5 vaccines (compared to the 72 required today) and one of them left me with IBS, which I still deal with today. Since much of this piece is about mandatory kill shots, I wanted to delve a little deeper into my second vaccine injury which occurred in 1971 when I was 17 and a freshman at a small college. Perhaps a month after arriving at the school all students were informed that a flu shot was mandatory. There was no information provided about the shot, nor did anyone ask me if I didn’t want to take the the jab. All students were lined up in the cafeteria and the shots were administered to every student, myself included. No one asked me how old I was or if I was of age. Legally, at 17, the school should have gotten permission from my parents to give me the jab. They did not. Within a week I was deathly ill with pneumonia and my health quickly went down hill. For a month I thought I was going to die from hacking all of my breath out and not being able to take in any new air. Despite pleas from my roommate to the school nurse to provide some sort of help, none came. The one time I went in to see the nurse she said I had a cold and that I would get over it soon. Needless to say, I didn’t return to that school for a second year - nor have I had a vaccine since then.

Had I died from that flu shot, my death would have been on the hands of those who declared the flu shot mandatory. That school was Faith Baptist Bible College in Ankeny, Iowa. Those of you who have been following my work for some time may be having an ‘aha’ moment right about now. If anyone was wondering why I’m so upset with covid jab mandates, you now know why. They are literally a death sentence.

Numerous sources estimate (based on copious Nazi records) that at least ten million Soviet prisoners, Slaves, Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, Poles, mentally disturbed and numerous others were put to death by various means under Hitler’s eugenics program during WWII. I see no difference between mandates to round up people for Hitler’s death camps and mandates to round up people for covid kill shots. We’ll come back to this topic.

onward

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of FDA approval of Pfhizer’s kill shot is that it requires Pfizer to reveal ALL of the ingredients in its covid jab formula. Since my two earlier pieces dealing with findings pointing to the presence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer kill shots, there’s been a flood of backlash against that information, coming from the usual suspects - the vaxx makers and the legacy media they sleep with.

What follows is a piece I began working on a few weeks ago. I decided to hold off publishing it then because it seemed like more information was forthcoming. FDA approval of Phizer’s kill shot now makes this information timely. It’ll be interesting to see if the FDA approval forces Pfizer’s hand. Will we learn about proprietary ingredients or not? Will the recipe change? There is evidence to support the idea that that each vaxx maker has several different recipes, which would explain why they track lot numbers so closely.

This is a bit of a diversion from the thrust of today’s piece, so I’ve shortened it.

fact checking reuters fact check on the presence of graphene oxide in the pfizer jab

A search on duckduckgo for fact checks on the presence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer jab brings the Reuters fact check to the top of the list. Because Reuters is considered by the world wide legacy media as the king of news sources, anything it says carries a lot of weight with all other legacy media outlets, which likely accounts for why the Reuters fact check appears at the top of the search list. Of course, that doesn’t mean it’s authoritative, accurate or trustworthy. It could just mean that Reuters paid a hefty sum to get it placed high in the listing. Since it focuses on denying the assertions made by the Spanish researchers who found graphene oxide (GO) in Pfizers covid jab, lets consider the most pertinent aspects of this fact check.

First of all, we have to understand what Reuters is and what they do. Because I highlighted Reuters in this earlier piece about how the legacy media manipulates what we see and hear about the covid plandemic, I’m not going to rehash all of that here. I will say that that article ranks as the second most read piece in my entire collection, so if you have any interest in that topic, you’ll want to take a look. Suffice it to say that Reuters is a news distribution agency that many news departments around the world depend on for news of all kinds. Yes, this means Reuters wields an outsized amount of power and influence regarding what we learn about and don’t learn about from all legacy media formats.

Perhaps the most important piece of information to know about this Reuters fact check, which denies the presence of GO in the Pfizer jabs, is that the CEO of Reuters, Jim Smith, also sits on the board of directors for Pfizer. So, right off the bat we have a conflict of interest that would prevent anyone with any morsel of conscience from getting involved in this debate. I’ll let you decide what that says about Jim Smith.

Secondly, it’s obvious that writing this fact check required Reuters to commit a great amount of money to do the research, the kind a highly paid news staff do when pursuing a hot story - something I can only dream about.

Here is the most important quote in the piece, the one they hinge their entire argument upon.

“Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine,” Pfizer’s Senior Associate of Global Media Relations told Reuters.

The fact that the authors of this piece were able to get a comment from Pfizer says a lot about Jim Smiths ability to utilize his position as a Pfizer board member to tap into high level employees to acquire this comment. Or does it?

First of all we need to understand that corporate “media relations” departments serve as spin doctors on behalf of the corporations they serve. Their job is to take bad information about the company and spin it to make it sound good, or at least, not so bad. In other words, their official job is to lie on behalf of the corporation. So Reuters most prized source is from the Pfizer corporate department whose job is to lie.

Secondly, we need to consider the source, Pfizer. Pfizer is a very well established criminal institution. They’ve been found guilty in court numerous times for lying about what’s in their products as well as other crimes, and they’ve paid enormous fines for doing so. The total amount of their fines is not in the millions, not in the tens or hundreds of millions. It’s in the billions. One settlement alone was for over 2.3 billion. So yes, they require a very adept crew of liars in their spin department.

Due to the deaths and injuries caused by its covid jabs, I’m going to go out on a sturdy limb and predict that when the dust settles from this plandmeic, Pfizer will be facing its largest fine yet. It may even be forced to fold. In a healthy court system its executives will be taken to court and punished severely. Look for the executives to begin cashing out their shares and bailing on the company in the not too distant future. This article may help speed that process along.

Trusting Pfizer to tell the truth about what’s in one of their products would be like trusting a Columbian drug cartel to tell us that cocaine is a healthy, non-addictive drug. Other than the fact that one is somehow legal and the other is not, there isn’t much difference between Pfizer and a Colombian drug cartel - they both sell drugs that kill people and make billions doing so. According to the CDC’s VAERS site, Pfizers covid vaxx has officially killed 9,470 people (see chart below), and that’s just one of their many deadly products. If anyone knows of any Colombian drug cartel with a death toll as high as Pfizer’s lifetime-all-products death toll, please let me know.

Thirdly, what does an “associate of global relations” know about what goes on in the lab across the country (or on the other side of the world?) from where the media relations office is? And who is he? We don’t know because no name was provided. So how do we know this is a real position filled by a real person? We don’t. No proof is offered. We are left to take the word of Reuters. To this point - I’ve just perused Pfizer’s web site and I see no mention of a global media relations office, let alone anyone who works in it. I’ll give Pfizer and Reuters the benefit of the doubt and suggest that it’s a subcontracted agency. If so, that would mean it’s even more removed from any source of solid information about the proprietary ingredients in the jabs. After all, when your job is to lie, knowing real facts becomes problematic. Isn’t it better to keep the global relations department the dark?

But let’s dig deeper. Here are two more paragraphs from Reuters fact check.

“According to a factsheet on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s website here the ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine include: mRNA, lipids, potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose. It does not list graphene oxide.

None of the other COVID-19 vaccines available worldwide, manufactured by Moderna , Janssen, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinovac and Sputnik V, contain graphene oxide, according to ingredients lists visible here , here , here , here , here and here .” (sic)

What is not said in these two paragraphs is that there are patented, proprietary ingredients in all of the jabs, which patent law says do not have to be listed in the patents or in the ingredients list on the products. We have all seen this with many food products we use every day, which by law are supposed to list all ingredients, except those which the maker deems proprietary.

The Reuters fact check then goes on to say:

“Both manufacturers told Reuters the material is not present in their vaccines, and it is not listed among the publicly shared ingredients of the vaccines.”

Interesting how they make it sound like this statement is the word of God. And what “material” are they talking about? Why do they say “the material” and not graphene oxide? Is this some form of subterfuge?

It seems as if they’re essentially admitting that there is a difference between publicly shared ingredients and ingredients that are not publicly shared. Does Reuters really think that either Pfizer or Moderna are going to admit the presence of a secret ingredient protected by patent law? Especially one so controversial?

And who was the source from Moderna? Again, no name, nor a mention of a department.

This fact check would be incomplete without a look at the negative impact Pfizer’s covid jab has had on Americans. Here is the latest numbers from the CDC’s VAERS site on deaths, disabilities and so on from Pfizer’s kill shot.

verdict

False. The Reuters assertion, that there is no GO in Pfizers jab, is completely unfounded. We all know that both the legacy media and Pfizer have a sordid history of lying when it suits their needs. This looks to be a classic example of that. Not only that, Reuters is now complicit in helping to promote a criminal organization while that organization commits criminal acts - producing and administering kill shots (more on this coming up).

more on moderna

Since Moderna has been mentioned, let’s take a brief look.

Moderna is a much younger and smaller company than Pfizer, so it’s had less time to get its hands dirty (its covid jab is Moderna’s first big product introduction). That’s not to say it’s completely innocent. There is a pending SEC investigation over the role its top executive may have played in manipulating the stock market in the run-up to making its covid jab. Considering the investment bankers that sit on the board of directors, this isn’t surprising.

Then there is its long legal battle with Arbutus Biopharma, which it lost. Even Wikipedia offers up three paragraphs of criticism.

But it’s hardly the criminal organization that Pfizer is… for now. As the death and injury toll mounts from its mRNA jabs, Moderna will soon be losing its innocence. I predict a fate for Moderna similar to the one I predicted for Pfizer, with similar executive cash-outs by execs as they try to flee ahead of the legal crackdown.

In case you’ve never seen it, here is Moderna’s fact sheet about its mRNA jab for covid. Note that it claims that it “may prevent you from getting covid”, which, of course means it may not. It also says “There is no … (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19”.

Of course there is no mention of the tens of thousands of people the jabs have killed or the millions who’ve been injured.

Here are the latest numbers from the CDC’s VAERS site on the number of deaths and injuries from Moderna’s covid kill shot.

Note: The CDC’s VAERS states its numbers are updated every Friday, which is why I took the above screenshot Friday 8/28 (yesterday). Here is a screen shot from today.

As you can see, almost all of the numbers have been lowered, some greatly so. More shenanigans by the CDC. Time to do away with the CDC and court-marshal all of it’s pseudo officers for being complicit in acts of terrorism. It doesn’t need to be replaced because we don’t need vaccines or pharmaceutical drugs. We need to learn about what’s going to be taught at THC.

Reuters GO fact check also points to this paper by Heath Desk, a spin-off of Meedan. Meedan is a nonprofit with deep ties to the Arab speaking world and big tech. It’s funding includes a litany of big tech and Arab entities, some with questionable backgrounds. Health Desk is a sort of news distribution agency similar to Reuters, only more focused on covid topics. The citations in the article include the usual list of spin doctors who are cheer-leading the pandemic.

Update. As I was nearing completion of this piece, Reuters updated this fact check. It now provides a name of a person at Pfizer who it says provided them with the statement that there is no GO in the jabs. It also provides the name of a person from Moderna who it claims also denied the presence of GO in its jabs. That information has no bearing on the ultimate conclusion I draw about the original report. It does however, highlight the lame aspects about the original report that I pointed out. Those lame aspects have been bolstered, but not enough to change my verdict. It also suggests more collusion between the parties involved. As time goes by and the pressure mounts on these people, look for them to be taking ever more steps to make sure they’re all on the same page, using the same talking points.

I should point out that I did a search on Pfizers site for Keanna Ghazvini, the person Reuters cites as its source within Pfizers Global Media Relations department (still not found), and no such person comes up. I found such a person by that name on LinkedIn, but there is no mention of a position at Pfizer in the profile. At best, this is a moot source.

I did find Ray Jordan, who the updated Reuters check cites as its source from Moderna. He does occupy the position Reuters claims. His background includes the typical corporate critter stuff.

One would think that the CEO of Reuters, Jim Smith, while also occupying a seat on the board of directors at Phizer, would be able to get a quote from someone who at least warrants a mention in Pfizers employee profiles. It’s a bit baffling that he can get a quote from an expendable (literally), low level exec at Moderna, but not at Pfizer.

(End of Rueters fact check.)

9/11 anniversary

Whenever I post VAERS charts (above and below) I like to let new readers know that this government funded Harvard study shows that less than 1% of vaccine injured people file a report to VAERS, so the real numbers are much, much higher. If we just consider the “official” numbers we can see that already, more than 4 times as many people have been killed by the covid jabs than were killed on 9/11. The anniversary for 9/11 is coming up and you can bet that the legacy media will talk extensively about the 2,970 people who were killed on 9/11 while not saying peep about the 14,000 who have been killed by the covid kill shots over the past 8 months. We have people like Jim Smith to thank for that.

marketing

Those of you who have been paying close attention to the terrorist campaign being waged by big pharma and big media may have noted that, thus far, none of the marketing for the covid jabs has been conducted by the vaxx makers - there have been no advertisements anywhere in the media paid for by Pfizer, Moderna or J&J for their respective jabs. Instead, all of the marketing has been done by the CDC, the FDA (more reasons to do away with both of them) and the media. How convenient. I wish some major government agency would start promoting this blog to the same extent that it promotes the kill shots for the fat-cat vaxx makers. Can there be any better example of socialism for the rich? Or fascism for those running this coup d'état?

Why is any of this important? Because part of marketing drugs is about explaining how safe and effective a product is. Now that the FDA has approved its kill shot, Pfizer can now legally market it across all media platforms. But wait, it’s not. Why not?

The question becomes - how can Pfizer justify advertising it’s jab as safe and effective when we have government agencies around the world (like the CDC’s VAERS in the US) with proof of a legacy of tens of thousands dead and millions of people with permanent disabilities and injuries? Given that the countries with the highest level of vaccinations, like Seychelles and Gibraltar (100%) now have the highest rates of covid infection so far, how can Pfizer tell anyone that its jab is effective at preventing covid? It can’t. Is this why Pfizer has no advertising campaign waiting and ready to go in the wings as it typically does when preparing to launch a new product? Has Pfizer dug its own financial grave? All of this begs the question - why did the media, the FDA and the CDC go all-out to promote Pfizers jab on behalf of Pfizer? Are they getting kickbacks? Is Jim Smith getting kickbacks for his role in bolstering Pfizer?

mandates

As someone who was nearly killed by a mandated flu shot as a 17 year old college freshman, my first question is: How many people are being killed or permanently injured by being forced to take the covid jab to keep their job, return to their university, get on a plane, go to a concert, or attend some other event for which vaccine mandates are now being enforced? We don’t know because no one is keeping track. Here in the US the level of competency in this regard is comparable to the level of competency of a third world country in 1900. No one is keeping track of such things because doing so would hinder the agenda…. the world wide eugenics program.

In short, at its worst, a mandate to get a covid shot can end up being a death sentence. At the least, it can end up being a mandate to acquire permanent injury or chronic illness for the rest of your life. There can be no question that anyone who is participating in dictating mandates in any way is guilty of:

Violating our constitutional amendments.

Violating the Nuremberg code.

Complicity in criminal acts.

Participating in terrorism.

In the history of litigation, those who promote a product found to have been lethal and dangerous have been found guilty of aiding and abetting murder and mayhem. Today, this would include those who have been the primary promoters of the kill shots so far - the CDC, the FDA and the media. It would also include any government officials who have signed or voted in favor of legislation for vaccine mandates. This would include:

President Biden.

President Trump signed both the EUA and The Act into law both of which got us into the mess we are currently in. I’m sorry to all of you Trump supporters out there but Trump is as guilty as anyone with all of this. This was highlighted at Trumps recent rally in Alabama when he admitted that he recently got the jab and recommended that everyone else get it. He was loudly booed. A few days later one of Trumps most long time, ardent supporters, Alex Jones, said this about Trumps vaxx comment - “… maybe he’s just a dumbass”.

President Obama, who signed the The 21st Century Cures Act into law.

President Bush who signed the Bioshield Act into law.

President Reagan invented the game of eugenics-by-legalized-kill-shot when he signed into law the National Childhood Vaccination Act.

It could also include state, county and city officials. In my case it would include all of the members of the Pima County Board of Supervisors who voted for vaccine mandates for county health care workers and county employees. These anti-American people prefer to mandate kill shots rather than give their constituents the freedom to choose.

When all of this goes to the peoples court or the Nuremberg 2 court - and it will - all of these people, the FDA, the CDC, Federal legislators who wrote and signed bills approving kill shots, all of the living presidents just listed, all of the state and local legislators, governors, mayors, county officials and so on - anyone who has signed or voted in favor of mandates for the kill shots, can be tried for promoting terrorism by forcing their constituents to take an experimental jab proven to be deadly and injurious.

Lest we forget, after the original Nuremberg trial, people like this were hung for committing such crimes, which is why the Nuremberg Code made it illegal for this to ever occur again. It would seem that many elected officials today have forgotten that we don’t serve them, they serve “we the people”.

the ultimate conclusion

This chart includes Pfizer, Moderna and J&J kill shots. It should be noted that although the death count is significantly higher, the total at the bottom is lower than it was last week. As has been the case throughout the entire plandemic, the CDC is still manipulating the data.

To get an idea of what the world wide death count is from the kill shots of all 3 covid vaxx makers, let’s do a little math.

Keeping in mind that less than 1% of people report deaths and injury to VAERS… if we take the total number of deaths from this CDC chart and multiply times 100(%) we get a total death count of 1,362,700 for the US. The US represents about 4% of the worlds population. We can get an idea of the world wide death count by extrapolating US data.

100% (the world population) ÷ 4% (the US population) = 25

25 x 1,362,700 = 136,270,000 potential deaths worldwide

136,270,000 ÷ 10,000,000 (holocaust victims) = 13.627

In other words, at this point the kill shots are responsible for the deaths of 13.627 times more people than Hitler. In fact it’s nearly twice as many as all deaths that occurred during WWII (70,000,000). This would make this the most deadly genocide event ever in the recorded history of mankind!

Granted, this is merely a rough estimate of possibilities. But it does begin to paint a picture of the scope of what’s really going on. Nevertheless, there can be no question - anyone who is mandating these kill shots is acting as an accomplice, which makes them guilty of complicity to murder. They should serve the maximum sentence of 25 years in prison.

Alan Watts (1915-1973) predicted all of this this when he said that at some point there would come “…a perfectly pestiferous mass of a million {conceited} saints”, wallowing in their ‘holier than thou’ delusion that they’re doing the right thing by mandating the jabs, when in reality, their killing people.

Lest we forget, the inquisition was once considered to be so virtuous that it had the blessing of the church. “The common good before the individual good!”, the church crowed in its approval of the inquisition. That was also one of Hitlers favorite lines. Today we know that in both of those cases that line was used to justify two of the most massive travesties of justice in the history of human existence, which resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people.

When will everyone wake up to the travesty at hand, easily the largest travesty yet?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.