Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Judy T's avatar

This is one of the best, if not THE best article you've yet written because it speaks to strategies and solutions to use in defeating the tyrants. The coyote metaphor is MOST appropriate, Coyotes are absolutely necessary in the animal kingdom so as to cull the weak and prevent any one group of mammals from overpopulating the territory and spoiling it for everybody else.

There's an update to the MO-LA censorship lawsuit linked above. The 1st Amended Complaint filed 8.2.22 is at: https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Missouri-v.-Biden-Amended-Complaint-w-Exhibits-8-2-2022.pdf Once Louisiana District Court Judge Doughty - a Constitutionalist - rules favorably on this case, the social media platforms will be OPEN to ALL facts and opinions. Govt will no longer be able to control the virus/vaccine narrative. The debate about the merits/harms of the vaccines will begin.

In addition to filing lawsuits and voting the anti-Constitution legislators OUT of office, we dissenters must SUPPORT the coyotes leading the charge. In the Louisiana vs the Governor Petition for Injunctive Relief, the dissenters rallied the troops, publicized info re the 'vaccines,' talked to their district reps, held meetings, invited nationally known scientists and political leaders who presented to the legislators and the public the science the CDC and FDA call "misinformation," and which the governor referred to as "misleading and conspiratorial rhetoric." Also, as learned in AG Landry's Petition, there are LAWS that are un-Constitutional, laws that our legislators need to revoke or amend so as to maintain the Separation of Powers. It's the system of Checks and Balances that preserve our freedoms and rights guaranteed to us in the Constitution.

Expand full comment
Judy T's avatar

Another lawsuit re social media censorship was filed by the AG of TX, and an Appeals Court, ruled in its favor. It was later stayed. It will likely be decided by the Supreme Court.

https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-51178-CV1.pdf

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts