food, soil, microbes, dna

turning off bad dna, turning on good dna

The Environmental Working Group (www.ewg.org) 2022 list of the cleanest and most contaminated - non-organic - foods.

Let food be thy medicine and medicine by thy food. Hypocrites

Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you who you are. Jean Anthelme Brillat Savarin

Hey there you wild and crazy bunch of freedom loving heretics! Thanks for all the new subscriptions and likes!

In several earlier pieces I’ve covered the advances the scientific and medical communities promised would come with the mapping of the human genome (the Human Genome Project - HGP) - cure for cancers, miracle vaccines, gene therapy treatments and so forth. As was pointed out, the mapping of the human genome was largely completed in 2003, with 92% of the genome having been mapped. Now, nearly 20 years later, sequencing the human genome has been declared complete. Yet, cancer is on the rise and the “miracle” mRNA, GMO covid vaccines administered over the past 15 months have killed and maimed countless millions around the world, while causing miscarriages and birth defects to skyrocket (see my previous ‘death by covid jab’ statistical compilations). It seems playing God is more difficult than imagined. Or, does the death and destruction wrought by the nRNA jabs over the past 17 months show that the goal of mapping the human genome was much more sinister then we have been led to believe? After all, as I previously pointed out, we know that ethnic bioweapon jabs are part and parcel of the Pentagons bioweapon research program.

To say that the mystical bubble that was created by the hyperbolic lead-up to the mapping of the human genome has burst, would be… inaccurate. While none of the miracle promises have come to fruition, we remain saddled with a gussied-up mystical bubble of untruths and hyperbole that, to this day, continue to bewitch the unknowing masses. The result of that is twofold; 1) millions of unsuspecting people have put blind faith into the DoD bioweapon covid jab technologies 2) the ensuing, horrendous death and destruction wrought by them.

onward

In spite of all of this pseudo-scientific dabbling with our physical nature, our existence remains something to contemplate. When I was a younger man, an older, seemingly wise, but very drunk man on a train once told me that our raison d'etre was to create. At the time, I thought that sounded lofty, but I now look back at that as a rather simple thought. I’m not convinced that the wildly divergent ways we all choose to interact with each other and our planet, is why we are here. After all, Bill Gates, who views the earth and its inhabitants as commodities to be manipulated for maximum profit is being creative. But in that effort he is also being far more destructive than much of the worlds population combined. In my recent interview with Sharine Borslien, she describes the Bill Gates of the world as Luciferian technologists. Where do we draw the line between being creative and allowing hubris to run wild?

Or, are we supposed to be innately more like the ascetics who see the human role as being more contemplative, more divine?

Or, do we see ourselves seeking balance with all life and all matter on this planet?

It seems that on some basic level we are a combination of physical matter and a more mystical component that some refer to as spirit, soul, consciousness, non physical being, or some other similar term. Does the direction that combination chooses to go determine which category a person falls into? Is that outcome a given from birth - is it genetic? Or is it the result of our life style, our interaction with others, our food and the earth itself? In other words, is it nature or nurture?

My interview with Dr. Tom Cowan reveals that he has given a lot of thought to the interplay between our physical bodies and our conscious being, and how disturbance to either one can manifest as either mental or physical illness, or both.

circling back

Because you well informed readers already know about the abject failure of the promises made about the HGP, you are also aware of just how misguided the mainstream scientific community is with its Luciferian fascination playing God by manipulating human DNA. As was just pointed out, the mRNA covid jabs currently being promoted by that community are the most prominent example of this technological hubris. Who is creating what here?

In previous articles I’ve discussed why that fascination is misplaced. The Cliff notes of those pieces are: We are so much more than a compilation of DNA components. As cutting edge researchers are now discovering, our DNA appears to only be the instrument… the thing making the music. The entity playing that instrument looks to be much more important. This is where it gets interesting. As I tried to make clear in those earlier pieces, researchers are now realizing that our incredibly complex microbiome plays an outsized role in caressing the instrument, in making it sound beautiful or… not so good. But the question then becomes, just who or what is in control of our microbiome? Or is it more complicated than that? Welcome to the twilight zone. I know of no one who can provide a definitive answers to those last two questions.

Without repeating much of what I’ve been saying in the previous articles here over the past 18 months, about how misguided the entire approach to modern medicine is, especially as it pertains to “vaccines” (in particular mRNA jabs), let me just reiterate that, given the declining health and decreasing lifespan of Americans, the abject failure of our modern medical system to improve our health is abundantly clear to anyone with the eyes to see and the will to learn.

What we are not being told by any of those promoting the highly profitable medtech agenda, is that our microbiome has the ability to play our DNA like a musical instrument, turning off bad genes and turning on good genes when we eat and do the right things, and turning on bad genes and turning off good genes when we eat and do the wrong things. Again, it’s more confirmation of the important role our microbiome plays in caressing our DNA instrument to make either Divine music or, not so divine noise.

Apparently this information is now becoming sufficiently prominent to cause those in the mainstream scientific community to pause and reevaluate their approach. Even that bastion of lame-stream science, Scientific American, has published a piece that considers the idea that what we eat affects our DNA.

While its nice to see lame stream journals catching up, many researchers and doctors have been talking about this for decades. The evidence is becoming insurmountable - we are mostly what we eat and the soil that food was grown in. We are also how we think (or don’t) and what we do. However, what we think and do can be heavily influenced by what we eat. The problem today is that so much of what we eat is not the same as what has nourished our ancestors for the previous 250,000 years. Of course there are the obvious altered foods like corn, soy, tomatoes, sugar, canola oil, cotton, zucchini and Hawaiian papayas, which have all been genetically modified for various duplicitous reasons, but I’m talking about more fundamental changes that have occurred to our food supply. Not surprisingly, the least known is also the most pervasive.

Modern agriculture is no longer regarded as an intimate relationship between the farmer and the land. It’s now more of a form of divide and conquer strategical warfare, in which the farmer seeks to conquer the land and all of its beneficial inhabitants (there are no natural inhabitants that are not beneficial) to make it a place in which his unnatural, foreign, technological, non terrestrial, mono-crop system will flourish. For you non-farmers out there, a mono crop is the cultivation of a single crop, like wheat, corn or soy, in the same place year after year. This is the ideal scenario in the Luciferian technofreakish world of controlling nature to maximize profits. The technological inputs are massive - the gargantuan tractors that plow up all the life giving organisims in the soil - organisims that never want to see the light of day - and expose them to the sun, thus killing the soil, are but one aspect of this massive disruption to the source of our sustenance, the soil. The complex soil microbiome, which prior to plowing was made up of countless micronutrients, is then replaced - after plowing - with 3 macro nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus and potash, all of which are mined from various sources around the world and transported to farms all over the US at a tremendous energy cost.

In the process of converting to this techno-dependent form of agriculture, a number of things have occurred, none good. First, due to dependence on outside inputs, farmers are no longer independent - they’ve now turned over control of their farm to outside sources - the Luciferian technocrats - for their inputs.

Second, to make a profit in this format, bigger is better. Consequently, farm equipment like tractors and combines have become gargantuan. So have their prices. So have the size of farms.

Thirdly, the number of farms has shrunk, which has also resulted in a shrinkage in the number of our food choices. Less diversity = less nutrition.

But the most detrimental aspect of the modern farming enterprise has been the destruction of our topsoil. If monocropping is good at anything, it’s destroying soil.

The result of this onslaught on soil, the very essence of our being, is… malnutrition. Malnutrition is a vast set of symptoms that occur when our micorbiome and our genes are not getting the nutrients they need to function properly. As was pointed out in a previous piece, epigenetics is becoming widely recognized as a primary aspect of who or what is caressing the instrument of our DNA, making it sing beautifully or… not. As Hypocrites pointed out nearly 2,500 years ago, food plays the largest role in determining who we are and how we function. It really is as simple as - good in, good out, garbage in, garbage out.

vitamin A

vitamin C

calcium

As you can see, those statistics are now 25 years old, which means the numbers would be far worse than that by now. Charts are from The Alliance for Natural Health.

the chemical option - a brief history of the introduction of toxins into our food system

In an earlier piece I pointed out how Norman Borlaug, the father of the Rockefeller sponsored Green Revolution (better farming through chemicals) exposed wheat seed to toxic chemicals to induce random mutations that he hoped would lead to mutations that he could use in developing strains of wheat that performed well under chemical agriculture ( late1940’s through early 1960’s). From the Rockefeller perspective, he succeeded. This program threw the door open to the Rockefeller agenda to impose chemical agriculture around the world. Corn was next, then soy, then many other crops. Then came genetic modification programs to make crops tolerant to the herbicide glyphosate. Over the span of a few short decades our food became laced with toxic chemicals, the likes of which our microbiome and our DNA had never before encountered in our previous 250,000 years of existence.

But there was pushback. By the 1970’s, many farmers and consumers instinctively knew that chemical agriculture was a bad thing. Some of them got together and coalesced around earlier work done by Sir Albert Howard (1920’s-30’s) and Rudolf Steiner (1920’s - Steiner’s work is now more commonly known as biodynamics.), both of whom are considered by many as the godfathers of the organic farming movement. J. I. Rodale (Prevention magazine, Organic Gardening magazine, Organic Farming magazine, publisher of many books on organic ag.) can be credited with making organic agriculture popular in the US.

Initially, organic certifying agencies were independent organizations, often run by farmers who rotated positions. By the 1990’s there was a push to bring organic certification under one giant agency, run by the government (USDA). I had some organic farming friends who pushed for this. Because I was opposed to big brothers involvement, it tore our friendship apart. As I predicted, the USDA organic certification program became infested with Big Ag wannabe’s. There is now an ongoing battle in the organic farming arena between those who are trying to do the right thing by Ma Earth and our food, and those who seek to inject their toxic, Luciferian, technological agenda into organic agriculture. Sadly, the technofreaks have made large inroads into organic agriculture.

Because of these inroads, another approach has been brought back from the past, regenerative agriculture. Although Charles Krone is credited with coining the term back in the 1970’s, realistically speaking, indigenous peoples around the world have practiced various forms of regenerative agriculture for millennia. When it comes to producing food in a way that continually improves our condition and that of the soil upon which our condition depends, this ancestral blueprint is the one to follow. The techniques used vary as widely as the different habitats in which humans have lived around the world, with each tribe adapting to the existing conditions and foods that could be grown (or hunted) where they lived. Because these systems were so in tune with local ecosystems, the modern farmers of today would have a very hard time distinguishing any line between where these systems of soil enhancement and food production end and where the natural world begins. A good example of this is the Amazon rain forest. We now know that much of the Amazon rain forest did not randomly occur, it was cultivated by many generations of people who lived so closely with the earth that they created one vast garden in which they could flourish along side all of the native animals. There is much to be learned from that.

If we are what we eat, then it stands to reason that we are the soil from which we eat.

As a child of the original Soil Conservation Service run by Big Hugh Bennet, which arose out of the dust bowl in my home sate of Kansas; as a student of J. I Rodale, who began using the term ‘regenerative agriculture’ back in the 1980’s; as a student of Permaculture since 1980; as a long time acquaintance of the late Wes Jackson, founder of The Land Institute; and as a life-long organic/regenerative farmer, I have my own idea of what it means to practice regenerative agriculture. I would tell you what that means, but what I do here on my farm is not necessarily what will work where you are. But there are fundamentals that apply everywhere. Like the original regenerative practices utilized by indigenous people everywhere, first and foremost is the need to know the place where you live and learn to work within that native ecosystem. Secondly, remember it all begins with the soil. Good soil = good results = happy DNA = good health.

beware, infiltration continues

I’ll say this about Klaus Schwab, he doesn’t let much grass grow between his toes. Already he and his WEF cronies have their hooks into the regenerative farming movement. In this contradictory page, the WEF claims that “technology” will help feed the world. It also wrongly sates that the staple crops that keep the world fed will decline if emissions are not curbed. What they don’t tell you is that most of those staple crops are grown in small plots by hand - no emissions are produced in this process. It’s the Big Ag sector, with its gargantuan, fuel guzzling tractors and combines that’s responsible for most of the ag sector production of greenhouse gasses. And most of those crops are exported around the world, not utilized by local economies. In other words, what they want to do is eliminate even more small, local, efficient, family farmers so they can gain control of more market share.

This WEF page features a picture of one of the most destructive aspects of Big Ag, the use of gargantuan machines to harvest crops and then more gargantuan machines to harvest the residue of the crop, the straw, which leaves nothing for the soil. This mining-of-the-soil-to-maximize-profits is the epitome of what’s wrong with Big Ag and highlights Klaus Schwab’s hubristic, misguided approach. It also explains why Bill Gates now owns more farm land in the US than anyone else. Controlling the land and food production systems of the world in this manner is the real agenda of the Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab’s of the world. (Bill Gates being one of Kluas Schwab’s early Young Global Leaders graduates).

To me, the scariest WEF page is this one. Why? Partly because it pertains to so much of the Earths surface, but primarily because it brings in the Wall Street/Black Rock/Vangurad types, all of whom, collectively, have more power than many governments, none of whom were ever voted into those positions of great power.

We need to stay diligent about all of this to keep them from usurping this last vestige of hope for more nutritious food production and healthier, cleaner soil.

given these statistics…

Chronic disease now affects 54% of Americans and for the first time in generations the lifespan of Americans is going down. The creative forces that have worked so well for the past 250,000 years are now out of balance. Hubris now overwhelms much creative sanity.

The gentle sweet caress of our previously balanced microbiome is now being savagely whipped by unprecedented incursions into the sanctity of soil and the complex circle of life it sustains.

As above, so below.