I have long believed in Terrain Theory so whenever I hear the origin of the virus is in the Wuhan lab, I just say it is a red herring. Red herrings are a device used in mystery stories to deliberately lead the reader astray so that the real perp is harder to find. You don’t want the reader to know the answer immediately. BTW, I notice that now they are starting to use the Ukrainian biolabs as red herrings for the Covid thing. Just more red herrings although I do not doubt that mad scientists were happily trying to create dangerous pathogens for the sake of the money, the research grants, and/or the fame. Fauci himself was such a mad scientist when he started with AIDS.
The Cabal throws out these red herrings so that people will not see what is really going on. You get some knowledgeable people fighting with other knowledgeable people, and before you know it, you have divided and conquered and thus the opposition is weakened. That is what the Cabal does best. I watched an interview with Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman in which Cowan explained that the reason all the ferrets died in the experiment with the spike protein was because they were all killed. The mad scientists conducting the experiment killed them to examine them, and mistreated the poor creatures. The ferrets might have been sickened from their ordeal rather than the injections, although these were toxic too. It was hardly a controlled experiment. He studied the actual research papers of the experiment, ridiculed it appropriately, and showed that the people quoting the experiment either had not read the research and the papers or had only read the summaries which are often misleading as the researchers force their conclusions to please their funders.
Could it be that viruses, bacteria and fungi are just part of the terrain? And the idea is to keep oneself in optimum functioning capacity so as to not be taken asunder by the little varmints?
In the new video by Sam Bailey, she talks about Theory and Hypothesis. She says virology has proposed a hypothesis. It only becomes elevated to a Theory once there is evidence gathered to support the hypothesis (an explanation that has been repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method). Evidence for virology is severely lacking.
Their language has become more precise in the last few months, I think they are moving the debate forward, even if only slightly.
Steve Kirsch runs his VSRF. There is no need for a Quackcine Safety Research Foundation if there is no virus. He also funded trials for early CV19 treatment, fluvoxamine. No virus, no early treatment. He also said he and his wife 'caught' covid, so he has personal conviction.
He also said Stefan Lanka's control experiment was worthless.
It would cost Steve nothing to sign on to the Virus Challenge, but he has too much at stake to let it go, otherwise he would jump at the chance to learn the truth.
Thank you Kyle. I just found your substack, and I am happy. As a biologist, I know that terrain theory is right. I have used it for many decades to successfully cultivate mass cultures of many microorganisms.
I don't understand why germs and terrain can't BOTH be contributing to illness. Kyle writes, "Early in that unlearning/relearning process I became aware of the debate between Luis Pasteur and Antoine Béchamp that took place in the mid 1800’s, a debate about what was more important, the terrain or germs." So, it sounds like neither of them were arguing that the other's mechanism had no role to play in pathology. It was simply a question about which was more important? You are unlikely to get sick if 2) your immune system is functioning optimally or 2) you are never exposed to a disease-related pathogen. To get sick, we need both a weak terrain (immune system) and a foreign life form or toxin that can produce symptoms if the immune system doesn't stop it.
I view the whole debate as a distraction and possibly a psyop to divert us from the pure evil of our governments and other institutions.
That’s a great way to put it! I did need surgery to cut out all the necrotic bone. And remove multiple teeth. That was never going to repair itself. And I was on a PIC Line for 8 weeks for antibiotics. The infection had been there for years and had been misdiagnosed multiple times, everything from TMJ to Trigeminal Neuralgia and everything inbetween. Had it been properly diagnosed somewhere along the way, none of that would have been needed. I never had much faith in doctors or dentists. I lost 99% of it at that point. The 1% reserved for the incredible surgeon from Jamaica who finally got to the bottom of it and told me how bad all the others were. He’s back in Jamaica now so my trust level at zero!
I am a student of Antoine Bechamp and a critic of Louis Pasteur. Pharma latched on to the germ theory and "vaccination" in the 1800s as a profit generator. They have never lessened their grip. Our problem becomes one of establishing agency that can oppose profit. We are awash in proof of the power of money. Health be damned.
Though getting this subject right is important, since I read Dianetics I have been convinced that there is a mental (spiritual) component to disease that too many of us totally ignore. There is no particular reason why only one mechanism of disease should exist. On the biological side of things, though, the poison model is fundamental. And on the spiritual side, psychic poisoning is also fundamental (called "toxic personalities" in modern parlance).
And the psychopaths of the world seem to be very interested in creating the biological poisons of the world. Though science and "modern" medicine seem vital to us now, the fact is that the humans on this planet survived without those things for thousands of years. So there is a con game / protection racket aspect to this whole business that is quite worth exploring and exposing.
I follow various writers and websites to encourage "the plunge" into greater questions of spiritual existence and causality. If I thought those questions were purely esoteric and not pertinent to finding better answers, I wouldn't be here encouraging others to take that plunge.
I'm not here to explain it all or interpret it all. Good luck to those who try. For me, the obfuscation of Spirit is the greatest propaganda campaign ever waged against people who are essentially spiritual beings. Sure we need better answers to disease and crime. But without a proper awareness of Spirit, those answers, no matter how promising they seem to be, can't prevail.
Interesting. I don’t know which side I’m on. I do know that after suffering my entire life, or most of it (60 years) with recurring sinus related issues and taking hundreds of doses of antibiotics two things occurred which ended the madness. First, I discovered I had maxillary osteomyelitis in the upper left quadrant of my face, including an open fistula into my maxillary sinus. Getting that addressed helped but did not totally get rid of the issues. Second, starting Covid prophylaxis in very early 2020, Vit D, Vit C, Quercetin, Zinc, NAC and then HCQ a few months later and not a single sinus issue since. And of course, no Covid.
Sep 26, 2022·edited Sep 26, 2022Liked by Kyle Young
Finally, another blogger I can read along with Jon Rappoport! Thank you!
The only positive thing I can say about Steve Kirsch is that he doesn't ban people questioning him repeatedly like I have.
There were very few of us, but eventually he turned his focus from the vaccine makers and governments to the very few of us who refuse to go beyond "there is no proof that COVID-19 or any other virus exists or makes people sick or spreads from one person to another."
I don't go to his substack anymore. It reeks of controlled opposition even though I have no proof of that.
Hey Kyle, I really enjoyed your article and so included it in a little round-up I write. I'm not sure that it will translate to much by way of traffic, but nevertheless, I thought you might get a kick out of it.
Re your mention of Cowan being “bushwhacked” in a debate, I agree he was bushwhacked. It matters that debaters know who they will be debating in advance so that they can study their opponent’s arguments and be prepared to counter them. Seems that the opposition found Cowan’s weak spot – that of needing time to ponder the question, consider all the angles, and organize his thoughts to best support his case. Lawyers are well-trained in courtroom practice and in time develop the skill of improvising. Scientists not so much.
It’s BACK. It’s in NYC. It’s DEADLIER than ever. It’s POLIO. We’re SUNK. No, we’re SAVED. Bill Gates is BACK with a life-saving vaccine for sale.
Seems the populace isn’t sufficiently scared of monkeypox. They’re saying NO to the vax. But THIS TIME Gates has a disease that is guaranteed to terrify the populace into getting vaxxed – 2 shots plus 6 boosters should do it. In Gate’s world, if at first you don’t succeed in meeting your depopulation quota, then try, try, again.
There are a few things that stand out to me throughout these "debates" over the past two years. I know a few of these people well enough that I can speak to this in general terms.
The first thing that has stood out to me is that those who are questioning/refuting "germ theory" (Cowan, Kaufman, Wallach, Stone, Bailey's, Lanka, etc.) consistently show intellectual curiosity and possess a desire to gain more knowledge on not only the scientific matters involved but also the history, geopolitical connections and how it is all relevant to today.
Most of these individuals have also been immersed in this for some time- let's just say the "Covid" fraud is not their first rodeo so the level of insight that they possess comes from a deeper contextual understanig of the situation than those who are newly arrived to the "pandemic theatrics."
The next item that stands out to me is that many of those who are 'out in front' of the "Acceptable Covid Dissidents" (Kirsch, Malone, Kory, McCullough, Berenson etc.) ARE relatively new to these discussions and while certainly the scope of this particular con is in part responsible for that, I believe there is also an element of opprtunism that is being exploited by some of these people.
It is also quite clear that those who support "viral theory" but opposes certain Covid policies have little tolerance for these outside discussions and possess a very narrow view on the many other aspects of what is happening. I believe one reason that this is so is that they can't speak to these issues and therefore must keep these issues off the table so as to retian their crediblity.
As an example, I challenged Steve Kirsch on what he knew about the history of HIV/AIDS and what were his primary sources for that knowledge. He answered by stating all he knew was what he heard from Judy Mikovits- that HIV was an engineered lab attenuated virus. He has no interest in looking into this further. It would illustrate that the "theory of a sinlge virus" is nonsense and that he does not know anything anout this history so maybe is not the "expert" he pretends to be.
The one area where I think the likes of those refuting germ theory/viral theory need to shore up and highlight a bit better is the politcal/economic/social origins of germ theory. In virtually all of the presentations I have seen (and I've seen just about all of them) this history is glossee over or omitted entirely.
Including this analysis establishes the position that virology itself was built on a foundation of fraud and racketeering and was never grounded in medical or scientific discovery.
Using this type of analysis as a launching pad into the discussions on the dubious science of virology pulls the layperson into the discussion more readily and illustrates that right from the start this was a fraudulent enterprise.
I too get so frustrated with the people on "our" side pursuing the phantom virus. Alas, we are brain washed from an early age to believe everything the authorities tell us.
Another excellent article.
I have long believed in Terrain Theory so whenever I hear the origin of the virus is in the Wuhan lab, I just say it is a red herring. Red herrings are a device used in mystery stories to deliberately lead the reader astray so that the real perp is harder to find. You don’t want the reader to know the answer immediately. BTW, I notice that now they are starting to use the Ukrainian biolabs as red herrings for the Covid thing. Just more red herrings although I do not doubt that mad scientists were happily trying to create dangerous pathogens for the sake of the money, the research grants, and/or the fame. Fauci himself was such a mad scientist when he started with AIDS.
The Cabal throws out these red herrings so that people will not see what is really going on. You get some knowledgeable people fighting with other knowledgeable people, and before you know it, you have divided and conquered and thus the opposition is weakened. That is what the Cabal does best. I watched an interview with Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman in which Cowan explained that the reason all the ferrets died in the experiment with the spike protein was because they were all killed. The mad scientists conducting the experiment killed them to examine them, and mistreated the poor creatures. The ferrets might have been sickened from their ordeal rather than the injections, although these were toxic too. It was hardly a controlled experiment. He studied the actual research papers of the experiment, ridiculed it appropriately, and showed that the people quoting the experiment either had not read the research and the papers or had only read the summaries which are often misleading as the researchers force their conclusions to please their funders.
Could it be that viruses, bacteria and fungi are just part of the terrain? And the idea is to keep oneself in optimum functioning capacity so as to not be taken asunder by the little varmints?
In the new video by Sam Bailey, she talks about Theory and Hypothesis. She says virology has proposed a hypothesis. It only becomes elevated to a Theory once there is evidence gathered to support the hypothesis (an explanation that has been repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method). Evidence for virology is severely lacking.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/are-viruses-even-a-scientific-theory:2
Their language has become more precise in the last few months, I think they are moving the debate forward, even if only slightly.
Steve Kirsch runs his VSRF. There is no need for a Quackcine Safety Research Foundation if there is no virus. He also funded trials for early CV19 treatment, fluvoxamine. No virus, no early treatment. He also said he and his wife 'caught' covid, so he has personal conviction.
He also said Stefan Lanka's control experiment was worthless.
It would cost Steve nothing to sign on to the Virus Challenge, but he has too much at stake to let it go, otherwise he would jump at the chance to learn the truth.
Thank you Kyle. I just found your substack, and I am happy. As a biologist, I know that terrain theory is right. I have used it for many decades to successfully cultivate mass cultures of many microorganisms.
I don't understand why germs and terrain can't BOTH be contributing to illness. Kyle writes, "Early in that unlearning/relearning process I became aware of the debate between Luis Pasteur and Antoine Béchamp that took place in the mid 1800’s, a debate about what was more important, the terrain or germs." So, it sounds like neither of them were arguing that the other's mechanism had no role to play in pathology. It was simply a question about which was more important? You are unlikely to get sick if 2) your immune system is functioning optimally or 2) you are never exposed to a disease-related pathogen. To get sick, we need both a weak terrain (immune system) and a foreign life form or toxin that can produce symptoms if the immune system doesn't stop it.
I view the whole debate as a distraction and possibly a psyop to divert us from the pure evil of our governments and other institutions.
That’s a great way to put it! I did need surgery to cut out all the necrotic bone. And remove multiple teeth. That was never going to repair itself. And I was on a PIC Line for 8 weeks for antibiotics. The infection had been there for years and had been misdiagnosed multiple times, everything from TMJ to Trigeminal Neuralgia and everything inbetween. Had it been properly diagnosed somewhere along the way, none of that would have been needed. I never had much faith in doctors or dentists. I lost 99% of it at that point. The 1% reserved for the incredible surgeon from Jamaica who finally got to the bottom of it and told me how bad all the others were. He’s back in Jamaica now so my trust level at zero!
I am a student of Antoine Bechamp and a critic of Louis Pasteur. Pharma latched on to the germ theory and "vaccination" in the 1800s as a profit generator. They have never lessened their grip. Our problem becomes one of establishing agency that can oppose profit. We are awash in proof of the power of money. Health be damned.
Though getting this subject right is important, since I read Dianetics I have been convinced that there is a mental (spiritual) component to disease that too many of us totally ignore. There is no particular reason why only one mechanism of disease should exist. On the biological side of things, though, the poison model is fundamental. And on the spiritual side, psychic poisoning is also fundamental (called "toxic personalities" in modern parlance).
And the psychopaths of the world seem to be very interested in creating the biological poisons of the world. Though science and "modern" medicine seem vital to us now, the fact is that the humans on this planet survived without those things for thousands of years. So there is a con game / protection racket aspect to this whole business that is quite worth exploring and exposing.
I follow various writers and websites to encourage "the plunge" into greater questions of spiritual existence and causality. If I thought those questions were purely esoteric and not pertinent to finding better answers, I wouldn't be here encouraging others to take that plunge.
I'm not here to explain it all or interpret it all. Good luck to those who try. For me, the obfuscation of Spirit is the greatest propaganda campaign ever waged against people who are essentially spiritual beings. Sure we need better answers to disease and crime. But without a proper awareness of Spirit, those answers, no matter how promising they seem to be, can't prevail.
Interesting. I don’t know which side I’m on. I do know that after suffering my entire life, or most of it (60 years) with recurring sinus related issues and taking hundreds of doses of antibiotics two things occurred which ended the madness. First, I discovered I had maxillary osteomyelitis in the upper left quadrant of my face, including an open fistula into my maxillary sinus. Getting that addressed helped but did not totally get rid of the issues. Second, starting Covid prophylaxis in very early 2020, Vit D, Vit C, Quercetin, Zinc, NAC and then HCQ a few months later and not a single sinus issue since. And of course, no Covid.
Finally, another blogger I can read along with Jon Rappoport! Thank you!
The only positive thing I can say about Steve Kirsch is that he doesn't ban people questioning him repeatedly like I have.
There were very few of us, but eventually he turned his focus from the vaccine makers and governments to the very few of us who refuse to go beyond "there is no proof that COVID-19 or any other virus exists or makes people sick or spreads from one person to another."
I don't go to his substack anymore. It reeks of controlled opposition even though I have no proof of that.
Hey Kyle, I really enjoyed your article and so included it in a little round-up I write. I'm not sure that it will translate to much by way of traffic, but nevertheless, I thought you might get a kick out of it.
https://carsonmcauley.substack.com/p/some-stuff-i-think-you-might-like-afe
Re your mention of Cowan being “bushwhacked” in a debate, I agree he was bushwhacked. It matters that debaters know who they will be debating in advance so that they can study their opponent’s arguments and be prepared to counter them. Seems that the opposition found Cowan’s weak spot – that of needing time to ponder the question, consider all the angles, and organize his thoughts to best support his case. Lawyers are well-trained in courtroom practice and in time develop the skill of improvising. Scientists not so much.
It’s BACK. It’s in NYC. It’s DEADLIER than ever. It’s POLIO. We’re SUNK. No, we’re SAVED. Bill Gates is BACK with a life-saving vaccine for sale.
Seems the populace isn’t sufficiently scared of monkeypox. They’re saying NO to the vax. But THIS TIME Gates has a disease that is guaranteed to terrify the populace into getting vaxxed – 2 shots plus 6 boosters should do it. In Gate’s world, if at first you don’t succeed in meeting your depopulation quota, then try, try, again.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-nw-gates-foundation-funds-polio-vaccines-warns-threat/?itm_term=home
There are a few things that stand out to me throughout these "debates" over the past two years. I know a few of these people well enough that I can speak to this in general terms.
The first thing that has stood out to me is that those who are questioning/refuting "germ theory" (Cowan, Kaufman, Wallach, Stone, Bailey's, Lanka, etc.) consistently show intellectual curiosity and possess a desire to gain more knowledge on not only the scientific matters involved but also the history, geopolitical connections and how it is all relevant to today.
Most of these individuals have also been immersed in this for some time- let's just say the "Covid" fraud is not their first rodeo so the level of insight that they possess comes from a deeper contextual understanig of the situation than those who are newly arrived to the "pandemic theatrics."
The next item that stands out to me is that many of those who are 'out in front' of the "Acceptable Covid Dissidents" (Kirsch, Malone, Kory, McCullough, Berenson etc.) ARE relatively new to these discussions and while certainly the scope of this particular con is in part responsible for that, I believe there is also an element of opprtunism that is being exploited by some of these people.
It is also quite clear that those who support "viral theory" but opposes certain Covid policies have little tolerance for these outside discussions and possess a very narrow view on the many other aspects of what is happening. I believe one reason that this is so is that they can't speak to these issues and therefore must keep these issues off the table so as to retian their crediblity.
As an example, I challenged Steve Kirsch on what he knew about the history of HIV/AIDS and what were his primary sources for that knowledge. He answered by stating all he knew was what he heard from Judy Mikovits- that HIV was an engineered lab attenuated virus. He has no interest in looking into this further. It would illustrate that the "theory of a sinlge virus" is nonsense and that he does not know anything anout this history so maybe is not the "expert" he pretends to be.
The one area where I think the likes of those refuting germ theory/viral theory need to shore up and highlight a bit better is the politcal/economic/social origins of germ theory. In virtually all of the presentations I have seen (and I've seen just about all of them) this history is glossee over or omitted entirely.
Including this analysis establishes the position that virology itself was built on a foundation of fraud and racketeering and was never grounded in medical or scientific discovery.
Using this type of analysis as a launching pad into the discussions on the dubious science of virology pulls the layperson into the discussion more readily and illustrates that right from the start this was a fraudulent enterprise.
Well said.
I too get so frustrated with the people on "our" side pursuing the phantom virus. Alas, we are brain washed from an early age to believe everything the authorities tell us.