has spielberg seen the light?
is hollywood waking up to the dangers of letting fascists genetically manipulate our food and vaccines?
No one rules if no one obeys. David Icke
Welcome back all of you non-obedient, wild eyed, freedom loving heretics! Ya’all are throwing a huge monkey wrench into the carefully orchestrated gears of the divide and conquer agenda employed by those who want to separate and label us all according to skin color, gender, vaxx status, socioeconomic status and so forth. The powers that be are losing control because of your ability to forgo those divisive labels and expand your perspective well beyond the limited scope of what they want you to know about. And I love you all for doing so! Keep working that wrench and keep on growing!
Welcome to all of you new subscribers and thanks to those of you who hit that like button. It all helps.
spielberg
I haven’t been in a movie theater for a very long time. Regular readers will know that’s not because I have any concerns about covid. It has more to do with the lack of anything worthy of watching. But I’m a sucker for a good science fiction, adrenaline pumping thriller, so the other day I found myself walking into a theater to watch Jurassic World - Dominion. I hadn’t heard anything about it, but I did enjoy the earlier versions, so… in I went. Although I wouldn’t consider it a great movie, I’m glad I went to see it, just to learn what Hollywood and Steven Spielberg (executive producer) in particular, are thinking.
Some of the leading characters from previous Jurassic Park movies reprise their roles for this one. I was surprised early in the movie when the script included a conversation among these nicely aged characters about regenerative agriculture and other topics that veer completely away from lame stream science.
But the real shocker comes when we learn that Biosyn, a company whose real world counterpart could be Bayer/Monsanto or any other major fascist corporation hell-bent on genetically manipulating our food supply, has brought back from some ancient past age a formerly extinct grasshopper the size of a dog that has multiplied into vast swarms and is eating its way across the major food producing states in the Midwest. Major food shortages and mass starvation are predicted. Sound familiar? But that’s not the sinister part. The sinister part is that Biosyn has developed genetically modified seed crops that the swarms will not touch. In other words, if mass starvation is to be avoided, the world must switch to Biosyn seed or face an apocalypse.
I want to assume that Spielberg has awoken to what has been going on for the past several years and is now aware of how corporations like Pfizer and their lackeys in government like Fauci, Trump and Biden are now a fascist ruling elite, manipulating affairs to their advantage: Create a virus - whether in reality or in ones mind - and then generate a terrible fear of said virus that forces people to think that their only salvation is the high tech solution (vaccines) offered up by the very same people that created the problem. For this reason the parallels between the plague story told in Dominion and the covid plandemic do not appear to be accidental. If so, this would indicate a major turning point for Hollywood - or at least for Spielberg - away from championing all things archon, techy and evil, moving towards a more people friendly, earth-centric model.
And yes, for all of you adrenaline junkies out there, there are plenty of scary scenes of close encounters with nasty dinosaurs. It was probably for this reason that the movie was largely panned by the ‘professional’ critics who all failed to make the connections between the movie and today’s reality. Nevertheless, it’s doing very well at the box office because it remains a great summer movie for kids of all ages. But the important take-home of this movie is not the acting, the cinematic aspects, the special effects or the set designs. No, the take home are the questions it raises about where the fascist alliance between the government and corporate driven technology is taking us. For this reason alone I think Dominion is worthy of watching.
Sadly, like the critics who missed it, many people will not make the connection between the covid plandemic and the grasshopper plague in the movie. Hopefully, at some point in the future that will click.
I wanted to talk about this because it serves as a very nice segue to today’s topic.
elmo
But wait, there is other fascist entertainment news. On Sesame Street we now have Elmo and his dad working on behalf of big pharma and the government encouraging parents to get the covid vaxx into their kids. Since when did a children’s tv show become a propaganda tool for big pharma and the government? Will Sesame Street ever promote writers on Substack? Of course not. This is the level of degenerative inequality we have achieved in the US with the fascist media helping to engender a eugenic covid vaxx campaign.
Considering that the chance of children in Elmos age group getting covid is essentially non-existent, but according to VAERS, the risk of them having an adverse reaction to the jab is quit high, and considering that the Sesame skit provides no scientific data for getting the jab, all of this makes me think that Sesame Street should be held partly liable for covid vaccine injuries to children.
Here are the latest VAERS numbers for adverse events in 1 to 5 year olds from the genetically altered covid vaxx.
That’s nearly 2,000 adverse events and 4 deaths… so far.., in 1 to 5 year olds from the gmo covid jabs. Any parent who takes their kids in to get jabbed is irresponsibly playing with fire.
Decided to include the latest overall death count. It’s closing in on 30,000.
onward
Dr. Michael Antoniou is a molecular geneticist who has been outspoken about the dangers of genetically manipulating our food crops. In particular, he has been adamant about exposing the lies being put forth about the ‘precision’ of gene editing techniques.
The following quotes, including those that appear later, are taken from this interview with Dr. Micheal Antoniou on Sustainable Food Trust.
“The gene-editing tools in question here invariably produce unintended DNA damage [and that can] end up changing the biochemistry and the composition of the crop and that could include the production of novel toxins and allergens.”
“The gene-editing tool DNA can fragment and bits of it can randomly insert in many locations around the DNA of the plant, and that is not being checked for. At each one of the stages of the gene-editing process, you introduce unintended genetic alterations running into the hundreds of thousands. Even the process of growing plant cells in the laboratory introduces hundreds of sites of DNA damage. You end up with a plant that carries a high burden of unintended DNA damage with unknown downstream consequences.”
This happens to be the case with modern wheat, which was altered by random chemically induced mutations so that the modern varieties of wheat the world now consumes have 500% more gluten than the varieties my ancestors grew in Kansas a mere 100 years ago. More on this shortly.
This becomes especially worrisome given the fact that the UK government has recently taken steps to deregulate the use of gene editing technologies. This means that field trials of genetically altered crops can be done without any oversight or regulation. But the UK is merely following in the footsteps of China which made similar approvals of gene editing in early 2022. And both of them are just trying to catch up with the fascist US. All the way back in March of 2018, Secretary of Agriculture under Donald Trump, Sony Perdue, issued a statement saying the USDA will not regulate gene edited crops - a classic top down, deep state edict that no one got a chance to vote on. Thanks Donald.
We can count on all of this resulting in the release of genetically altered DNA into the environment with unknown consequences to us and the greater biome.
Gene editing should not be confused with genetic modification, where a gene from a completely unrelated entity is inserted into the genome of the target crop or livestock. This is known as transgenic modified organisms (gmo’s) and is not the same as editing the native, existing genes within a target crop or livestock.
But, both are bad.
In recent years the CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease system of gene editing has greatly simplified the process of gene editing, resulting in the explosion of gene editing now underway. To understand how CRISPR/Cas9 works it’s helpful to go back and read my earlier piece on the Rockefeller Foundation funded work done by Norman Borlaug on wheat during the late 40’s through the early 60’s. This work gave birth to the “Green Revolution” - better farming through chemicals. Of course, many of those chemicals were products produced by various Rockefeller enterprises.
A primary aspect of Borlaug’s work was exposing wheat seed to highly toxic chemicals to induce genetic mutations on the chance that a few of them would produce favorable traits that could then be utilized in Borlaug’s greater wheat breeding program. This chemically induced mutation process is known as mutagenesis. CRISPR/Cas9 also functions by generating mutagenesis… in spades. Yes, a favorable trait may be generated with this process, but what are the unseen, unfavorable effects that don’t show up - in the crop or in those who consume it - until well after the crop has been released into the environment? The rampant increase in cases of gluten intolerance diseases that now plague the world, caused by the 500% increase in wheat gluten thanks to the Rockefeller/Borlaug project, provides the perfect example of the unforeseen consequences of fooling with mother nature. Additionally, in the Middle East, a type of fungal rust now infects most of Borlaug’s wheat because it has no immunity to the rust. If the rust spreads to North America, were in big trouble. All courtesy of the Rockefeller Foundation. One begins to understand why Dr. Antonio is so concerned about the random mutagenic nature of the gene editing process.
the rockefeller foundation
Lest we forget, more recently the Rockefeller Foundation gave us Operation Lockstep as part of its greater Scenarios For Future Technology and International Development in which the covid plandemic agenda was laid out years in advance. The paternalistic attitude of this archonic organization and those like it (The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) are strong driving forces behind everything bad that’s been happening for the past 75 years.
Apparently Operation Lockstep didn’t go far enough. In late 2019, shortly after Event 201, the Rockefeller Foundation instigated the Reset the Table program to “transform the US food system” in the wake of food shortages that have arisen during the covid plandemic. Translated, “transform the food system” means, take it over. The most interesting thing about this program is that it was put together well before the results of the plandemic were known, as if they had foreknowledge that one of the results of the plandemic was going to be food shortages. Hhmmm…
These archons have far too much power and influence and… way too much money.
patent laws
The driving force behind this gene editing free-for-all are patent laws which currently allow gene edited crops to become patented (owned). While many aspects of the patent laws regarding gene editing remain in a sort of gray zone, especially as they pertain to human DNA, at this time, patents on gene edited crop plants are moving ahead. These crops are no longer considered part of the greater commons of humanity and are now the sole property of private corporations. Here is one such patent regarding rape seed (canola).
Here in the US the FDA has taken the ridiculous position that gene edited crops are the same as traditionally bred crops. Unlike the former, the latter has been done for thousands of years and can even occur randomly in the wild. But the latter has strong process of natural selection working for it - any weakness causes the plant to fail in the harsh reality of the natural ecosystem. This is not true of the former. The former is done within a few months in a lab, and as has already been pointed out by Dr. Antoniou, it results in all sorts of crazy, random, unforeseen and unknown mutations.
The supposed regulatory agency known as the FDA has opted to not just regulate gene editing but promote it as well. This means traditional farmers who grow traditional crops and livestock will be left out in the cold as the FDA moves to promote those corporations and the mega farms pushing gmo’s and gene edited crops and livestock. This, of course, will result in your ability to find real, unadulterated food becoming ever more difficult.
Beware, the New World Order is coming and if you have not yet been convinced of the need to get that garden going and keep a few chickens, I hope this news motivates you to do so.
livestock?
So far, all of this has been about crop plants. What about gene edited livestock? Sadly, it’s already happening. The push is to speed up the process of achieving desirable traits in livestock by using gene editing to knock out specific genes in favor of others. Keep in mind the mutagenic way gene editing works.
Especially with livestock, it helps to have a modicum of understanding about how a living being unfolds. The short version is that there are two basic sets of aspects to any living being - the genotype and the phenotype. An easy way to think of this is that the genotype is that part of a living being that remains unseen. In livestock this could be personality traits, emotional attitudes, birthing abilities, fertility issues and so on. Phenotype traits are those that are easily determined by looking at a living being - its size, conformation, its ability to gain weight, and in the case of a dairy cow or goat, its udder and teat development. It’s these exterior traits that the Rockefeller Foundation was paying Norman Borlaug to tease out in wheat, and it’s that same external phenotype approach now being taken with gene edited livestock - to make them grow bigger, faster, with bigger udders and so forth. In the same way Norman Borlaug’s work ignored the genotype aspects of mutagenesis, which resulted in a 500% increase in wheat gluten, so too are the new Frankenstein gene editing scientists ignoring the genotype consequences of their work. World-wide gluten sensitivity has resulted in the premature deaths of millions of people, most of whom went undiagnosed because of the lack of understanding about gluten sensitivity in lame-stream medicine. (Thankfully there are a few doctors who are on top of the gluten issue. Here is one of the best.)
If all this death and destruction is the result of the 60 year old Rockefeller/Borlaug mutagenesis project known as the Green Revolution, what will be the diseases that arise from the ignorant, rampant use of the mutagenic ‘science’ of gene edited crops and livestock?
I’m going to close out this piece with a series of quotes from Dr. Michael Antoniou.
“The genetic engineering procedure and this includes gene editing, has the potential to damage the DNA, damage the genetic material and makeup of the plant, in unintended ways at multiple stages in that procedure.
So that at the end of the process, you end up with combinations of gene functions that do not exist naturally. And if you alter gene function, you automatically alter the biochemistry of the plant.
And altering the biochemistry can… included within that altered biochemistry can be the production of novel toxins and allergens. And as a health scientist, that is my main concern.”
“But specifically with gene editing, the worry is that it will exclude from the GM definition certain types of gene editing so that, legally speaking, certain food crops, which have been gene-edited, will not be classified as GM and can be sold as non-GM.
And a farmer and a supermarket could be selling them inadvertently thinking, “Oh, it’s non-GM.”
But you would be dishonest.
You may be legally on solid ground by saying, “Oh, this gene-edited food is non-GM,” but scientifically you will be completely dishonest because gene editing is unquestionably a genetic modification process that gives rise to genetically modified organisms.”
Gosh that's really scary. It's already so hard to find good, healthy food. One of the hardest parts about it is the social aspects of eating. Because the majority of people don't seem to believe (or at least act like they don't) that the food they're eating is the reason for their health problems.
Like I've heard so many people express the attitude that gluten insensitive people are just making it up.
I wish this meant that Hollywood was waking up. But I think often it's only subconsciously they know the threat when writing the scripts.
I really wish this was nothing but a sci-fi plot though. It's like living through a horror movie.
I really appreciate you writing, Kyle. I wish I had a more intelligent comment to write, but I have trouble getting over feeling stunned and horrified by what they're doing to the food supply.
I guess they figure we are like a bunch of rats and oughta just be happy to have some semblance of food no matter it may not be healthy for our bodies or may adversely effect our DNA (short or long term) and what not!!! The root of all evil!!!