mercola, hollywood/civil war/ai, ivermectin, the foreign war on our liberties

I take notes on topics I consider important enough to write about. Most fall by the wayside or get pushed back by new topics that I deem more important. Sometimes important ones get so backed up that I cover several in one post. This is one of those times.

mercola

This one is short. Many of you commented on my earlier post regarding the questions swirling around Dr. Mercola.

I wanted to let you know that he recently took down two of my comments on one of his articles. One was a couple of friendly tips I gave to another commenter with some links to this ‘stack. There were no disparaging remarks about Mercola, no bad language, no ad hominem attacks on anyone. I’m left to assume it was taken down because Mercola didn’t agree with the information I provided. That amounts to cold blooded censorship. The other comment taken down was nothing more than a link to one of Dr. Sam Baileys Substacks.

So much for the ability to debate science and exercise my Constitutional right to free speech on Dr. Mercola’s site.

That theme will come up again shortly.

hollywood and civil war

Some months back I mentioned the upcoming movie Civil War and speculated about its potential predictive programming. That movie has now been out for about three weeks. Wanting to know more about the who, where, what, why and when’s of a movie with this much propaganda potential, I saw it about a week ago.

Before we get into the plot of the movie, we need to try and understand who made it and why. Some Hollywood backstory may prove helpful.

Hollywood is in turmoil. Americans are now rejecting the dull, formulaic approach it has depended on for the past decade or so. People are rightly clamoring for new, original and creative output, output that is not so predictive, not so mind numbing. Hollywood has proven itself unable to meet this demand. Hence, big studios are in decline; Warner Brothers, Universal, 20th century Fox, Sony, Paramount, you name it. Even relative newcomers like Marvel and DC Studios, which were wildly successful for a while, are now in a tailspin as people grow weary of their rehashing the same characters in the same formulaic roles.

enter stage left, ai

Because Hollywood has decided that AI is much cheaper than paying people living wages, many aspects of Hollywood are about to be taken over by AI. If you think Hollywood cranks out a lot of predictive programming, wait until it gets taken over by AI. Lest we forget, AI is only as smart as those who program it and the materialistic sources AI taps into for learning. As I pointed out here, what the short history of AI is already showing us is that its inability to perceive spirit (soul) means it cannot be trusted. To complicate matters, Hollywood wants to take a predictive programming system like AI and impose it on top of its own predictive programming system, which as we all know is heavily influenced by deep state, three letter agencies that all have globalist agendas.

Folks, if you thought Hollywood was corrupt, wait until you see what it cranks out after it teams up with AI. Sure, there will be some production that appears interesting on the surface, but what we wont be able to see is what AI is implanting subliminally.

Those globalist three letter agencies must be chomping at the bit to get AI movies in front of the eyes of the masses. Mark my word, it’ll be a dystopian nightmare worse than what we’ve been witnessing for the past four years.

The writers strike that had much of Hollywood in lockdown last year was mostly over writers concerns about AI taking their jobs. They were seeking guarantees that they would still be a part of the movie making process. They got a few concessions. In the future Hollywood movies will be a mix of scripts written by AI and real humans.

Hollywood is also concerned about the ongoing development of movie making technology that’s allowing the movie making process to be ever more accessible to the masses. The time is not too far away when platforms for making movies will become as widely available as website building platforms. In other words, we are not that far away from movie making versions of Substack. If I had the funds and the programming skills to do so, I’d be working on creating one of those platforms right now.

Needless to say, in the same way Substack has the Wall Street Journal, the NewYork Times, the Washington Post and all other legacy news outlets in turmoil, this new movie making future has Hollywood terrified.

That’s the Hollywood backdrop for the making of Civil War. In a way, civil war is brewing in Hollywood.

Civil War is set in the near future. Texas and California have formed a Western Alliance to overthrow the powers in DC. Florida is trying to form its own alliances in the South East US, but we hear very little about that.

The goal of the Western Alliance is to capture DC and kill the sitting president. We know he's been lying to the American people about how well his forces are doing and how poorly the Western Alliance forces are doing, but other than that we know little about him.

The movie revolves around three reporters who have known and worked with each other for many years in some of the most war-torn areas of the world. A young wannabe photographer joins them on their cross country trip to get to DC so they can interview the president before it’s too late.

The movie has two plots: The primary one is about war news coverage. The civil war is more of a subplot.

The four encounter all manner of obstacles as they drive across the war-torn US, which makes the journey feel like Homers Odyssey. But instead of journeying home, they’re journeying to what many consider the home of the US, DC. Along the way the innocent, young wannabe photographer is exposed to one atrocity after another, some of them involving her fellow travelers.

The movie took an interesting turn for me when one of the reporters reveals that they work for Reuters. Up to that point the movie had been mostly neutral on product placement. (Long time readers may remember that I’ve corrected Reuters and its infamous globalist fact checking service on several occasions.) I was unable to find any particular link between Reuters and the makers of the movie, although that doesn’t mean none exist. My guess is, that mention was a nod to Reuters for providing a glowing review of the movie. The movie makers may have also received a financial incentive to mention Reuters.

Because the two states are so very different, the first thing most people say when confronted with the idea of a Texas/California alliance is… that seems unlikely. But, as I pointed out in that earlier post, currently, both California and Texas are governed by proponents of Kluas Schwab’s WEF.

Because California governor Newsom seems very pleased with the fascist steps taken by the Biden administration and has expressed no concern about its cozy relationship with the DC deep state, it seems unlikely that he would want to overthrow the Federal government.

Then we have the hypocrite, Texas Governor Abbot, who four years ago signed a bill to protect free speech on college campuses and then recently proclaimed freedom of speech on college campuses does not apply to criticism of Israel. Given his other WEF positions, he also doesn’t seem like someone who has any beef with the globalist deep state in DC.

Neither come up for reelection until 2026.

Granted, the movie is a work of fiction. But when $50 million dollars is at stake and an opportunity to impose some social programming is in the mix, we can be sure that there are vested interests in play.

By the way, Civil War is doing so well that it recouped that $50 million in its first week of ticket sales.

Consequently, rumors abound about this movie. Is it a CIA plot to instigate a real civil war - a globalist plan to divide and conquer? Is it a plot by white hats to pull Americans together? Is it a way for the same powers that shouldn’t be who profited from Bush era 9/11 patriotism to once again profit from similar patriotic zeal generated by this movie? Or does it provide a plan on how to destroy the deep state in DC?

My take… I don’t know. I’m just here to look at what’s known and ask a few questions.

To get a better understanding of all of this we need to dig.

At the time when I mentioned this movie in that earlier post I had done some research on A24, the relatively small indie studio that made the movie. I was curious why a small studio would be involved in making a movie that seems to have so much potential for manipulative, globalist players. Usually those types of movies fall to the big studios listed earlier. That question was also brought up by Dave Martel in a recent interview with Stew Peters.

Part of what makes A24 different is that it’s headquartered in New York, about as far from Hollywood as one can get in the continental US.

Originally a distribution company, A24 expanded into the studio business. For many years A24 was a struggling indie film maker. Then they began to get traction with the movie Ex Machina, which portrayed a female AI robot as being very conniving to gain its freedom. It does so by killing humans.

Then last year A24 saw Everything Everywhere All At Once win 7 Oscars. This movie also asks us to set aside our belief systems and consider many wild and crazy things. This movie came about after Stripes announced in 2022 that it had invested $225 million in A24. Stripes is a growth equity firm based in Manhattan, founded by Ken Fox. As part of the deal, Ken Fox now sits on the board of A24.

Ken Fox also sits on the board of TEAK Fellowship which provides scholarships to “,,,talented students from low-income families…”.

In other words, TEAK helps put children into the indoctrination program known as higher education.

TEAK is in part funded by other NGO’s that focus on kids: CIFC, Herkshire Foundation for Children. In turn, TEAK also funds similar organizations.

Go Fund Me, notorious for taking the money of Canadians who donated to the Trucker Convoy, is one of the portfolio companies of Ken Fox and Stripes.

Anthony D. Minella is the other A24 board member. Minella heads up Eldridge Industries, a massive investment group that has its tentacles in insurance, assets management, technology, sports and gaming, media and music, real estate and consumer businesses. He also sits on the board of ten other corporations. In other words, he’s not only in a position to influence movies made by A24, he’s able to influence large segments of our society.

While doing research on the people affiliated with A24 I found several historical ties to Guggenheim Investments, a very old, very sprawling investment company. The Guggenheim family now runs five influential foundations that play roles in manipulating society.

A24 was founded by Daniel Katz, David Fenkel and John Hodges.

Directors and writers are the creative force behind movies. Understanding them takes us a long way towards understanding the movies they make.

Civil War was both written and directed by Alex Garland, a Brit.

A rhetorical question: Does his being British have anything to do with the unlikely pairing of Texas and California in the Western Alliance?

Garland is no stranger to making movies that support official narratives and engage in predictive programming. He wrote the script for the 2002 film, 28 Days Later, a post apocalyptic horror film about the accidental release of highly contagious, aggression inducing virus. Somehow that sounds familiar.

Garland also wrote the script for the 2007 psychological thriller Sunshine, where astronauts go on a mission to attempt to reignite the dying sun. I can see that as a future scenario as a fear based, revenue generating campaign by the powers that shouldn’t be.

He then wrote the screenplay for the dystopian romantic film Never Let Me Go.

That was followed by writing and coproducing the science fiction film Dredd, in which Judge Dredd serves as the judge, jury and executioner in a future dystopian city.

Garland then went on to write and direct the previously mentioned AI/robot film, Ex Machina (who assimilates into humanity) and the spooky science fiction film Animation. I’ve seen both of those predictive programming movies.

Garland is the maternal grandson of the writer Jean Medewar and biologist Sir Peter Medewar. Jean was the chairman of the British Family Planning Association. If that organization is anything like Planned Parenthood in the US, then it’s probably safe to assume it has its roots in eugenics. Sir Peter was instrumental in developing the tissue biology that enabled organ transplants to become possible. He shared the 1960 Noble Prize in Physiology for "for discovery of acquired immunological tolerance”. Because of this he is widely regarded as the father of the organ transplant industry. Some of you may recall that I recently wrote about that as being The Other Medical Death Cult.

The take home from all of this is that Garland is not your typical all American boy. He’s not typical. He’s not American. And his history indicates he has a very - how can I saw this in a way that is not hyperbolic - unconventional background. Does that explain his fascination with dystopian themes? His penchant to push official narratives? The repetitive theme in his movies that the masses are disposable?

The point I’m trying to make here is that I have no solid conclusion to make about this film. Apart from that, the movie does a fine job of creating confusion and separation.

Maybe that was the goal.

ivermectin

In recent weeks ivermectin has come under attack from several quarters. Ivermectin is officially considered an anti-parasitic, antiviral pharmaceutical drug. It falls so far outside of my wheelhouse that I’ve never even considered using it, which is why I’ve never recommended it or written about it in any detail.

I realize there are many others who do use it, who recommend it and even have it listed for sale on their websites and Substacks. I know some of you dear readers subscribe to some of those other writers, so I’ll try and make this short and sweet.

A few days ago Dr. Sam Bailey published a video in which she questioned why some doctors and researchers were recommending ivermectin to treat a covid virus which has yet to be isolated, that does not exist.

The Ivermectin Games

Celia Farber recently published a post linking a video that details how ivermectin causes infertility.

One Video Lists Many Fertility Damaging Properties Of Ivermectin: What Can We Conclude?

The topic of the ongoing mass culling of the population, including lowering future populations by destroying fertility via the covid jabs, has been well covered here. It’s now beginning to appear that the promotion of ivermectin was a backup plan to ensnare many who refused to take the jabs. Have all of those people who thought they were being careful by taking ivermectin as an alternative to the covid jabs been duped?

Am I the only person who finds it interesting that all of those who consider themselves to be in the health freedom movement, yet continue to cling to the unproven theory that viruses exist and are causative of disease, are often the same people who have been promoting ivermectin?

The flip side of that is, I don’t know anyone in the no-virus camp that promotes ivermectin.

What’s so very telling about this story is who is covering it and who is not. So far we’ve not heard anything from Dr. Peter McColough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Mercola, Senator Ron Johnson, Robert Malone, Joe Rogan, Bret Weinstein or a host of other well known ivermectin advocates.

All of this makes me wonder how those who have been peddling ivermectin since the advent of covid will explain their way out of this.

usurpation of our liberties by a foreign entity

We may need to briefly set aside our concerns about the WHO and the treaty it’s trying to ram down the throats of member countries. That treaty is to be voted on later this month. I’ve not covered this topic because there are others who have made this topic their primary work - specifically, James Roguski and Meryl Nass.

An Update on the WHO Negotiations

Suffice it to say that the dangers the WHO and the treaty it wants to impose upon the world are fraught with tyrannical, unconstitutional, Orwellian powers.

But then so is HR 6090. This is not some treaty being proposed by a globalist entity to usurp our freedoms here in the US, this is a bill that was given bipartisan approval in congress a just a few days ago. The opening paragraph of the bill clearly states that an entity not of the US will now dictate to the people of the US how we must conduct our lives and our speech.

This bill provides statutory authority for the requirement that the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights take into consideration the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA's) working definition of antisemitism when reviewing or investigating complaints of discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. According to the IHRA's working definition, antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.

As you can see, this bill clearly gives the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) the power to curtail your first amendment rights.

Here is how Wikipedia describes the IHRA.

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), until January 2013 known as the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research or ITF,[1] is an intergovernmental organization founded in 1998 which unites governments and experts to strengthen, advance and promote Holocaust education, research and remembrance worldwide and to uphold the commitments of the Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust.[2]

While we were all worrying about the WHO, AIPAC and the rest of the zionist lobby in DC was successful in sneaking in a bill and getting it passed that accomplishes much of what the WHO is trying to do… steal our liberties and consolidate them into a foreign entity.

This bill does a number of things. First, it redefines what a semite is. Here is how Merriam's dictionary currently and correctly defines semite.

This bill is an attempt to redefine the term Semite so that it applies only to Jews. Now why would they want to do that? Maybe because it benefits Jews only? So, right off the bat we have preferential treatment, which of course, is not Constitutional.

What would happen if congress passed a bill that redefined white people and gave preferance to them? Or Black people? Or Latino’s? Of course, there would be hell to pay for doing so.

What if congress passed a law that made it illegal to question Whites, Blacks or Latinos? Of course there would be even more hell to pay for that.

What makes Jews so special that they get preferential treatment? Who decided that Jews are above everyone else - above the law of the land, the Constitution? Oh that’s right, the foriegn, the almighty, the zionist IHRA.

Under this law, if you criticize Israel in ways it considers unfair or unjust, you can be found guilty of antisemitism. And you can be punished. Again, the arbiter of this law is not the US Constitution or US courts, it’s the foreign entity known as IHRA.