the big whodunnit - part 1

national or corporate piracy under the high seas? both?

Hey there you diligent band of freedom loving heretics! Welcome back!

Things have taken an interesting turn in the past week. Although my dad was a minor manager in the bottom hole segment of the oil energy sector, he was an keen observer of machinations on the greater energy playing field. Hence, I come at this from a slightly different perspective than what is being touted from many other sources.

Over the last 50 years we’ve witnessed how alliances between the government, the military industrial complex, big tech, big pharma and the media have coalesced into a socialized, fascist state to inject billions into a tightly controlled, tyrannical propaganda campaign to scare the masses into lining up for highly profitable, but deadly and dangerously transhumanist jabs.

From their view, it may seem that their latest version of this campaign, what I call covidcon, has worked marvelously. Millions of well programed… I mean, well educated people have been completely duped and duly jabbed. As expected, the big payday has come. Trump and Biden have authorized that hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars be given to the instigators of covidcon to pay for all aspects of the jabs: development, testing, promotion, purchase, distribution and delivery. Those who are injured or who lost loved ones due to the jabs are considered by the winners to be the losers, are left to fend for themselves.

The ravages of spiritual warfare.

Media is no longer a centralized, easily controlled medium. Truth is now leaking out everywhere online - which is why yours truly and so many others have been censored by those big tech entities linked tightly to the deep state. But our diligence is reaching ever more people. As word gets out and the vast number of injuries and deaths from the jabs becomes ever harder to hide, the number of people taking boosters are dropping precipitously everywhere. In line with this, big pharma profits are also dropping precipitously. The result? The Black Rocks, Vanguards, NGO’s and deep state managers of the world are now shifting their focus to rigging another aspect of the centralized, global game board they created to control every aspect of our lives - energy.

Consequently, the energy game plan has that same odiferous fascist aura surrounding it. Like covidcon, the internet is once again throwing a wild card onto the elitists dark game board.

This is my first play.

If you thought the big tech/big pharma game board was messy, wait until you read about the complexity involved in this energy game board.

centralization = bad… decentralizaton = good

In part 2 we’ll consider ways to decentralize energy. In this piece were going to look at why centralized energy sources are such a bad idea.

Massive, centralized, energy sources like Nord Stream, and its sabotage, highlight just how vulnerable the ‘centralization’ of anything is, be it the pharmaceutical industry or energy resources, and illustrates very nicely why centralizing anything is such a bad idea. And yet, world authorities like the WHO, the WEF, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and numerous governments continue to push for globalist scenarios. Why? Two reasons. They offer the best solutions for controlling the masses and more importantly, they offer great way to force everyone into a payment system that enriches the elite while enslaving everyone else to those systems.

Although most of the current game board physically lies in Europe and Western Russia, as is usually the case when it comes to big energy, one of the primary players is the US. Let’s have look at the major players, known and unknown.

nord stream

By now most of you know about the apparent sabotage of both the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines which supply gas from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea. Actually #2 was ready to open, but for reasons we’ll get into, it never was. And it does seem to be sabotage. Swedish seismologists recorded underwater explosions along the route of the pipe lines during the time period when the lines were thought to have been hit. Dmitry Peskov, Putins spokesperson, has said they think it’s a terrorist attack. An official statement from the Kremlin says “… it seems that this is some kind of terrorist attack”.

Even before the sabotage on the Nord Stream pipelines, machinations between Russia, the US and the Ukraine over natural gas that moves from Russia through Ukraine and the Baltic Sea to supply Europe were already having a profound effect on this winters energy supply outlook in Europe. This has to do with the fact that in retaliation for Russias invasion, Ukraine restricted oil and gas that flows through its pipelines from Russia to Europe. Why has it not shut them down completely? Because it’s still receiving payments from Russia for letting the flow continue. Yes, it does seem like some sort of gentlemen's war game with an unannounced agenda. Ahh, but there is an agenda and we’ll get into it as we go along.

Because energy availability in Europe is expected to be so very limited this winter, some European countries are already talking about imposing prison sentences on people who let their homes get above 78 degrees. How will they know? Digital electric meters and digital thermostats with wifi capabilities. If you have one, ask for it to be replaced with the old style analogue meter or thermostat.

Prior to he pipeline attacks, adding to European energy woes was Russia’s decision to reduce gas flow through Nord Stream 1, which, until the recent sabotage, was its largest pipeline in use. At that time Russia was blaming the slowdown on repairs, saying those repairs may last through the winter. The EU and the US are saying Russia’s flow reduction is retaliation for sanctions against Russia for invading Ukraine.

The newer Nord Stream 2 was completed in September of 2021 but due to a number of bureaucratic delays, as well as the questionable refusal by Germany to certify the new pipeline, although the line had been charged, gas had not yet begun to flow into Germany (more on this coming up). According to the previous link, NS2 had been put on hold just days before Putins invasion of Ukraine. However, in the more recent weeks prior to the pipeline attack, Putin had told the EU that all they had to do was “push the button” (give the green light) and the flow would begin.

Not now.

As of Thursday September 29, there were a total of four known breaks in Nord Stream 1 and 2.

Contrary to popular belief, Nord Stream is not a fully Russian owned company. Wikipedia explains the ownership breakdown.

Nord Stream 1 is operated by the special-purpose company Nord Stream AG, incorporated in Zug, Switzerland on 30 November 2005. Shareholders of the company are the Russian gas company Gazprom (51% of shares), the German companies Wintershall Dea and PEG Infrastruktur AG (E.ON) (both 15.5%), the Dutch gas company Gasunie (9%), and the French gas company Engie (9%).[16][28] The chairman of the shareholders' committee is German ex-chancellor Gerhard Schröder.

whodunnit

When an event like this happens, one of the best ways to look for responsible parties is to determine who benefits and who loses. In this case, because the technology to blow up a gas line of this size 70 meters under salt water is so complex, we also have to determine who would have the technical capacity to do something like this.

Some of the people that have been looking into this have taken the position that this had to be done with a military submarine. While that’s a possibility, I think there are much more subtle options. But, let’s briefly consider it. There are only a few countries in the world with subs capable of this type of attack; Russia, China, the UK, US and Germany.

From a practical point of view it seems that Russia would not want to cut off one of its primary sources of income by destroying its own pipelines. Not to mention the massive cost of repairing pipelines that are also now likely filled with seawater. It also seems Germany wouldn’t want to cut off it primary source of energy. Or would it? More on this coming up.

The UK got a small percentage of its gas from Nord Stream 1, but that loss of that can be made up from the Langeled pipeline that goes from the North Sea (Norway) to the East coast of England, as well as from shipping sources. As will be pointed out, numerous influential London based corporations have massive investments in the energy sector, which casts a shadow over the UK.

The US would seem to have no skin in this game, except that with Germany now cut off from much of its Russian gas, the US can now offer LNG to it via ships. Opps. That makes the US look like it stands to benefit from the sabotage of Nord Stream 1 and 2.

But there’s more parties involved.

Another possible means of attack is the use of timed depth charges. Any passing ship could have dropped depth charges with timers set to not go off until well after the ship had cleared the area. This seems unlikely. The chances of depth charges being dropped to that depth and making a direct hit on the target pipeline are slim, at best. Because the number of leaks corresponds to the number of seismic explosions detected by Swiss seismologists, that means each depth charge would have made a direct hit. Not likely.

Another scenario is that underwater drones were used to launch torpedos. But again, that limits the possibilities to a very few parties who might have the technological capability of making and remotely operating underwater drones and their torpedos. This one seems legit, but I have to wonder about the capacity of a small torpedo fired from a small drone. Those pipelines are 48” (OD) in diameter and are nearly 2" thick metal wrapped in concrete casing. Some experts are now claiming that the amount of explosives used on each location was equal to 200 to 250 pounds of TNT.

Another scenario is the use of specialized underwater teams to set timed explosives. In other words, a team could have been in the area months ago and set the charges to go off when they did. I’m leaning towards this scenario because it’s the most subtle and the potential number of candidates is huge. And here we have consider non-state players.

corporate options

One of the mistakes being made by those who have been writing about what countries might be responsible for these explosion is just that - assuming that a nation-state is responsible. When we consider how massive energy corporations operate with impunity around the world, as if national laws don’t pertain to them, we have to give the technical and financial capabilities of these behemoths some consideration. Although these companies may be based in a particular country, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re loyal to that country.

Here are the top ten largest offshore drilling companies in the world (there are many more), any one of which would have the technical ability to set timed charges on the NS pipelines. This is not a complete list, there’s Italian Saipem, Danish Maersk and so on.

Shlumberger founded by two Frenchmen, the notorious US based Haliburton, Texas based Fluor Corporation, Houston based Baker Houghes, London based Ensco Pic, Texas based Diamond Offshore Drilling, London based Rowan Companies (part of Ensco Rowan Pic), London based Noble Corporation, and Seadrill, founded by a Norwegian, but now based in Bermuda. Russia and the US.

Not only do all of those countries have skin in the game, they also all have teams that could be hired out by other countries to do the work.

Then there are the companies that specialize in undersea pipelines. One of the biggest is Cecon Cecon, out of Norway. As you will come to understand, this country and this company may stand to benefit the most from the destruction of NS 1 and 2. Then we have Saudi Aramco, Russia’s Gazprom, Canadas TC Energy Corporation, Williams Companies (US) and the French company Bollore, to name a few of the bigger ones.

Any of these companies (or their highly trained employees?) might be available for hire as a private contractor to set charges on the NS pipelines… for the right price.

the us

Prior to the Nord Stream attacks, in a supposed move to “secure natural gas supplies for the US”, Biden told US energy titans to curtail exports of oil and gas. Weeks ago, when Biden said that, I thought - big mistake, that will drive up energy prices worldwide and fuel inflation. Biden’s move will also tighten the stranglehold on energy sources for the EU. However, given the recent pipeline attacks, it’s clear that taking those pipelines out of the picture will do more to drive up worldwide energy prices than Biden’s lame request.

Tearing a page from the covidcon playbook - to create the dangerous appearance of something that in reality, doesn’t exist - it now seems apparent that the ultimate game plan has been to create a false impression that there is now an energy shortage and to use that as a reason to increase energy prices world wide.

We can be sure that the US energy companies will ignore Biden’s toothless request and will move to fill the gas void created by the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines, and profit greatly in the process.

the eu

The EU is an economic and military powerhouse. This is largely because of the 400 year long history of its largest member states having colonized much of the new world and Africa. Because of that history, it’s also home to many of the institutions that have long controlled many aspects of ‘modern’ African, South and North American societies. Here I’m talking about the idea of stock markets, banking systems, educational systems, Bilderberg, WEF, Masons, Knights Templar, the Vatican and The Black Nobility, (to name a few) all of which have their origins in Europe. Which brings me to consider what some have speculated - that the EU is being squeezed from the East and the West. While I’m not going to rule that possibility out, the next section explains why I’m a bit dubious about this.

Keep in mind that both the US and Russia have the ability to repair the pipelines in a timely manner.

germany

Another little known twist in this story is that Germany has been considering appropriating a section of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, where it comes onshore and goes to the German terminal, and using it to move LNG brought in by ship to a new loading terminal that would be constructed at the point of severance with the NS2 pipeline from Russia. Apparently, Germany has ownership of that section of the pipe, so it can do this. Russia has said that would be matter for lawyers to decide.

Germany has actually been preparing for this for some time. In March of this year Germany chartered 4 FSRU’s - specialized ships that can regassify LNG. LNG tanker ships would bring in the gas from other sources to the yet-to-be-constructed Nord Stream 2 terminal. Apparently, Germany can glean more gas this way than it can by having it come from Russia.

Here’s a simplified schematic of how it would work (courtesy MarineLink).

Does this mean Germany hoodwinked Russia into building NS2 so they could get a significant portion of that infrastructure built for free? Whatever the case, it certainly makes Germany look like another winner from the upstream sabotage of NS2. Keep in mind that the sea water that’s likely still filling both NS pipes through the gaping holes created by the explosions will be kept from rising to the higher level of this terminal point by a large gas bubble pocket at the sealed onshore metering station.

poland

In one of the more interesting twists to this story, Radek Sikorski, Poland’s ex-Foreign Minister, and Chair of the Delegation for relations with the US, and the husband of US journalist Anne Applebaum, tweeted his thanks to the US for the explosions. Right. Does he have some sort of inside information that the US is responsible? RT had this to say about Sikorski’s tweet.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova had suggested that Sikorsky’s tweet amounted to an “official statement that this was a terrorist attack,” while Moscow’s deputy ambassador to the UN, Dmitry Polyanskiy, thanked Sikorski for “making it crystal clear who stands behind this terrorist-style targeting of civilian infrastructure!”

Sikorski has since deleted that tweet.

Why was he so immediately and thoughtlessly thankful? Poland doesn’t have any skin in this game. Wait… what’s that? Oops, turns out, they do. Sikorski later added that this (the sabotage) will force Russia to negotiate with Poland and Ukraine to export more gas to Europe through pipelines the cross those countries.

But that’s only a minor part of the Polish connection. Sikorski failed to mention that on September 27, 2022 Poland and Norway opened a brand new pipeline that runs through Denmark to supply Poland with gas from gas rich Norway. And yes, ceremonial opening of the pipeline occurred within hours of the leaks being discovered!

This is not a direct line from Norway to Poland. It’s actually a tie-in to an existing pipeline called Europipe II that goes from Norway to Germany under the North Sea and now accounts for a large percentage of Germany’s natural gas. It’s been in use since 1999. Here we have two more little known winners on the big boys energy game board of NS destruction, Norway and to a lesser extent, Denmark. Even Sweden gets some of this gas.

norway

On Monday, the day before the leaks were noticed, Norways Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) told oil companies to be vigilant about unidentified drones seen flying near Norwegian offshore oil and gas platforms, warning of possible attacks.

Drones have been flying around the world for the past twenty years. Why would Norway's PSA choose to issue a specific warning within hours of the NS attacks?

As we have seen, Norway may benefit the most from the shut down of NS 1 and 2. Even if, in the not too distant future, we see retaliatory attacks on Norway oil and gas platforms, because some of the other major players also stand to benefit (like the US), can we assume that Norway, or at least some faction of it’s corporate oil and gas sector, was responsible for the NS attacks?

Always remember, when it comes to big oil and gas, nothing is ever as it seems.

summary

It’s apparent that this is a very complicated story with a lot of big-time players, any number of whom could be guilty parties. Like covidcon, sorting all of this out will likely take years and we may never know all of the details.

Beware of those who say they know whodunnit.