the ccdh pot calling the kettle black

let’s support substack

Hey there all of you freedom loving heretics!

As mentioned in the previous post, Substack is facing an onslaught of criticism for hosting writers like myself who are exercising their 1st amendment right to free speech, especially as it pertains to pointing out the lies about covid, masks, the lockdown, business closures, curtailment of religious freedom, the phony PCR test, and the jabs that use technology engineered in bioweapon labs in the US and China. I think we are all in agreement that this is information that needs to be exposed and I’ve been doing that here since November of 2020.

As many of you know, I’ve been banned on several online platforms since mid 2020. The ability to exercise free speech is growing ever more dire . Because of the threats that Substack now faces from entities funded by very dark sources (read on), and because Substack supports my right to freedom of speech, I feel the need to support them to help ensure that this platform remains intact. The only way I can do that is to offer paid subscriptions, which are now available.

When I began writing on Substack most other writers here were leaning left. As mentioned in some early posts, prior to the plandemic, I leaned somewhat left. While doing some research on Substack writers before beginning The Secular Heretic (TSH), a search revealed that there was only one other writer taking positions similar to mine - that was Tessa Lena. She was the first Substack writer I subscribed to.

I didn’t realize how conservative my writing must have been until I received an email from Substack a couple months in, saying that they essentially favored left leaning viewpoints, that they had some issues with some of my views, and that they were going to let me fly with them. I’ve often wondered about that. For a while I entertained the hopeful idea that perhaps Substack employees were reading my posts and having their minds changed. Now, well over a year later, because there are numerous other writers here that take positions similar to Tessa and myself, I have to conclude that Substack cannot be pigeon-holed as either a liberal or conservative leaning platform. In fact, it may very well be the most unbiased source of information in the US today. I have to say, given the powerful forces exerting censorship pressure today, I love Substack for taking that brave, visionary position. Substack is what Václav Havel calls an alternative free system existing within a tyrannical system. As more people find out about the lies and deception being spewed by the lame stream media like CNN, The Guardian, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, PBS, ABC, CPB, BBC and all the other bought-and-paid-for sources that vomit the official narrative as dictated by their elite overlords, the more Substack grows. As Havel points out, the result will be that those legacy media sources will ultimately collapse under the weight of their own poisonous lies.

The elites must hate not having control of this platform.

the ccdh

The primary source of criticism for Substack right now is the same one that’s been going after conservative folks since its inception in 2018, the Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). This far left organization seems to have at its core an agenda that is being backed by China. In fact, one of its primary funding sources is Swiss based Oak Foundation, which has known ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

Perhaps CCDH’s most infamous act was its accusation that 12 people were guilty of spreading most of what they deemed “misinformation” about covid, the jabs and alternative treatments. They called them the Disinformation Dozen. All of these people are also leaders in the freedom movement, which, of course, must not stand in a tyrannical system - Robert Kennedy Jr, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Erin Elxebeth, Sayer Ji, Kelly Brogan, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Sherri Tenpenny, Rizza Islam, Rashad Buttar, Christian Northrup, Ben Tapper and Kevin Jenkins. There may be some conclusions that could be derived by pointing out that I’ve been following the first 7 people on that list for many years before the pandemic began, but I’m not sure they’re worthy of mention here.

In concert with China and in a typical moment of fog, Chairman Biden, who seemed to have pre-knowledge of the CCDH narrative, said: “Facebook isn’t killing people — these 12 people are out there giving misinformation. Anyone listening to it is getting hurt by it. It’s killing people. It’s bad information,” “My hope is that Facebook, instead of taking it personally, that somehow I’m saying Facebook is killing people, that they would do something about the misinformation, the outrageous misinformation about the vaccine. That’s what I meant,”

To its credit, Facebook did an analysis of the CCDH report and concluded… it was garbage. Monika Bickert, Facebook VP of Content Policy:

“…these 12 people are responsible for about just 0.05 [percent] of all views of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.”

The CCDH “…analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500 users. They are in no way representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.”

Of course, members of the legacy media that clamored over each other to cover the original false report put out by the CCDH, never said a peep about Facebooks well researched rebuttal.

Having lost that battle, the CCDH has more recently turned its notoriously dark, deceptive, untruthful agenda on Substack. As was the case with the CCDH’s concocted story about the Disinformation Dozen, numerous legacy media outlets have dog piled onto the CCDH’s criticism of Substack. Here is a typical take on that story from the pro-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rag known as The Guardian.

The obvious question that rises out of this is; why does the legacy media insist on siding with such a proven loser as the CCDH? As I’ve mentioned in several earlier posts, ya gotta follow the money - big pharma is now one of the largest revenue sources for legacy media. And, as I pointed out here, people like Jim Smith, the previous CEO of Reuters News Agency, also happens to sit on the board of directors for Pfizer. How convenient. This is but one example of the revolving door that exists between the media and its primary sources of revenue and it goes a long way to explain why there is no longer a classically functioning fourth estate.

Is it any wonder that, with grotesque media connections like this people are increasingly seeing the need to support independent writers on platforms like Substack?

I don’t have to tell any of you regular readers that up until this week I’ve not earned a dime from writing this blog, so the CCDH can’t be talking about me as a contributor to the dollar amount they claim Substack makes from its writers.

I can also tell you that Dr. Mercola, one of the favorite targets of the CCDH who was highlighted again in the Substack story, joined Substack just a few months ago, so the number cited in the previous link as annual income from his (paid only) Substack subscription is a blatant lie.

Imran Ahmed, chief executive of CCDH, had this to say about Substack: “They could just say no. This isn’t about freedom; this is about profiting from lies … Substack should immediately stop profiting from medical misinformation that can seriously harm readers.”

Hhmm…. Seems like a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Apparently, in the Orwellian world of Imran Ahmed, it’s ok to lie about Substack writers and its ok for millions of people to be permanently maimed and killed by the jabs, but it’s not ok for Substack writers like me to warn people about the dangers of the jabs? Even though I use offical CDC reports and research compiled by PhD statisticians to back up my reporting?

This leaves one with the conclusion that the CCDH is hell-bent on death and destruction occurring at any cost. Sounds very satanic to me.

substack

To their estimable credit, Substack cofounders Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie and Jairaj Sethi have publicly said:

“As we face growing pressure to censor content published on Substack that to some seems dubious or objectionable, our answer remains the same: we make decisions based on principles not PR, we will defend free expression, and we will stick to our hands-off approach to content moderation,”

That folks, is why I must now offer paid subscriptions. Not only do these fine people at Substack need our support, but the handwriting on the wall also seems to be saying - especially given Chairman Bidens tyrannical tilt - that there may come a time when my Social Security income comes under threat.

So… I hope you will support this fine platform and myself by becoming a paid subscriber.

I love you all so much for your spiritual and financial support!

Upcoming pieces will be about EMF’s being emitted by the vaxxed and a detailed report on all of the major lawsuits currently underway against the globalists pushing the plandemic agenda.