47 Comments
User's avatar
MoodyP's avatar

A mildly interesting item, tangential to this missive perhaps, but more central to one of your prior posts. This is long and I’m a lawyer not a doctor but I do have some direct personal experience with the subject matter. And somewhat of a theory.

In re: to monoclonal antibodies: in 2015 I went through 3 full days of tests at the Adult Bone Marrow Clinic at a well known and prestigious University. How that all came about would take a book. The fear was that I had Amyloidosis, which can be arrested via radiation, chemo, and a bone marrow transplant but has an eventual case fatality rate of 100%. In the end, I was diagnosed with Kappa Light Chain Disease, cause unknown. Hence, where no cause can be established they label it MGUS. Monoclonal Gammopathy of any Unknown Source. Both Amyloidosis and LCD have this in common, an overproduction by the body of monoclonal antibodies. IgE, IgA, IgU, IgM, IgG are the 5 types of immunoglobulin antibodies produced by the body. The same antibodies that are stimulated into production by the jab or via natural infection. Overproduction of these antibodies eventually overwhelms the ability of the kidneys to filter out the byproducts of overproduction, leading to them being deposited as solids in most of the bodies organs. For individuals with massive overproduction the end result is that organs eventually accumulate enough waste and shut down, ultimately leading to death. That’s a very simple explanation of a very complex process, but the essence of it is that monoclonal antibodies are your immune system.

Hence I have always found it interesting that these have been used as a treatment for the pathogen. In speaking with my doctor at Duke about this issue, and the jab, it was baffling to him as well. I had no plans to get jabbed but I asked him his views anyway. He said no (this was April 2021) not until more research was done. He said for patients like you, whose immune system is already “working” when it should not be, the last thing you would want to do is stimulate it to produce more antibodies. I’ll be seeing him in March 2023 for my annual tests and it will be interesting to hear his position.

Amyloidosis and LCD are very rare, 2-3000 cases dx every year. However, the doctor said he believes that LCD in particular is far more present in the general population than otherwise believed. In orders of magnitude. LCD is most prevalent in men over 60. The reason for that is twofold. Almost nobody outside the hematology or nephrology disciplines knows about it. I have personally asked a half dozen physicians if they knew what it was. Only one did. And the tests to find it are incredibly expensive and time consuming. (3 days for me, 24 vials of blood, x rays, CT scans, fat pack, Congo red staining). And because some of the testing involved DNA analysis insurance considers it experimental and won’t pay.

So as this pathogen hoax has moved along I have often wondered how many people have LCD and don’t know it. And by using monoclonal antibodies, or getting jabbed, they are forcing an already over active immune system to become even more active…and with the spike and the lipid nano particles remaining in the body…whether the resulting damage over time could be disastrous. If the Hematologist is correct, and the 2-3000 level of people who actually get Dx with LCD each year is low by “orders of magnitude” then I could develop a theory of the case that by getting jabbed one has made a bad situation much worse and that some number of deaths that can’t be specifically related to the jab, are being caused by an already overactive immune system being placed into permanent overdrive.

Lastly, I know Dr Jessica Rose has done some work in looking at the formation of Amyloid Proteins following the jab. I’m just going to guess as this work continues what will ultimately be found will be devestating.

If you made it this far thanks for reading!

Christine's avatar

The mRNA vaccines are a chemical weapon designed to kill you as quickly as possible and nothing more - everyone who has been vaccinated will die, unless something is done to stop that from happening - see the above article I just posted, download and watch the video and perhaps try Richard Noakes's one second cure on yourself - shrug!!

MoodyP's avatar

Well certainly anyone who got jabbed will ultimately die. That’s a given. Every person is eventually going to die. And I think that a huge % of those who got jabbed already have one foot in the grave, whether they want to admit it or not. But I am unconvinced that everyone who got jabbed will die as a result of getting jab. The campaign and the narrative was designed to do more than just kill people. It was also about testing limits, of conditioning people for a loss of freedom, of testing different dosages, of testing different formulations on different races, it’s a very long list. And some people got very low doses, or they got saline, or maybe something else. So there will be some who suffer no ill effects. Either because their terrain was out of the ordinary and obliterated whatever was injected, or they received something like saline which would do no harm.

Kyle Young's avatar

An interesting story. So much of the information coming out indicates that your conclusion is accurate.

Anyone wanting to know more about some of this might want to follow the link in the article to the snake venom piece. I think that's the earlier piece you were referencing.

Agree about the testing. Would add that it was also about power and control.

Christine's avatar

In a perfect world, I would agree with you, but this is not a perfect world and the extermination of all who have been vaccinated is now a fact - from the scientists point of view, not mine or anyone else's: You can forget what is in the vaccines - a scientist has produced a video which tells you that, the vaccines are nothing else other than a chemical weapon to kill everyone it is injected into - download and watch the enclosed video, form your own opinion: Let the facts speak for themselves and you decide if they do. If mRNA Vaccinated – there are no mRNA in the shots and there never was, it all is a con to get you to have the vaccines with the intention of killing you, as quickly as possible: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BJqGWMB5uHzI/

MoodyP's avatar

So how about this. We are on the same side, saying the same thing, the point of contention (if there is one) is timing.

Allow me to tell you my story. I knew from the beginning that the entire thing was enterprise fraud of the highest order. Nothing passed the smell test. I documented the same in an email to my (then) healthy 95 year old father on 15 February 2020. The title of the email was “Re: Chinese Virus. In the year of the Rat, I smell one and it’s already rotting from the head.” My dad was writing his third book, which was a biography of my mom, who was a professional singer and sang in the 40s and 50s with many of the famous Big Bands and in the 60s and 70s sang studio back up at Motown Records for many artists whose names you would know. My dad fought in Korea for two years and when he got called up in 1951 he refused to get married until he returned. Which he obviously did. But there was a chapter in the book about that, and about his time in Korea and his question to me was about whether this “Chinese virus” meant we were again going to be fighting the Chinese because he still had his service rifle and could be ready to go in 24 hrs. (He had a great sense of humor.) So I gave him my answer, in 10 bullet points (his preferred method) under the I smell a rat title.

I also knew from the first mention that the jabs were a total fraud. I was a lawyer and after 23 years at ATT I retired very early. To stay engaged and make money I did research for trial attorneys. One case in 2003 involved a guy who died during a routine surgery. He had been taking a drug authorized under an EUA. So we needed to know if that drug could have been a contributing factor. It turned out to play no role. But I had to spend many hours to reach that conclusion, including spending time with experts. And I learned all about the why, when, and how of EUA authorized drugs. So from the moment they first mentioned the jab, I knew that something was very wrong because they broke every legal and moral principle of authorizing a drug under an EUA.

My belief is that the pathogen came from the lab, although I’m not convinced it was the Wuhan Lab. I think that is a cover story for something that likely escaped much earlier, possibly in Europe or the US. Wuhan was involved, but was not the original primary source. The pathogen had a dual purpose. It was designed to kill the old and the vulnerable, but it’s primary purpose was to provide the Vector for the coordinated worldwide response and fear narrative, which would quickly and efficiently prepare billions of people to give up all their fights, abandon any independent thought, and (figuratively) climb onto the cattle car without even inquiring as to the trains final stop. As you say, it was all a con. As I say, in legal terms, it was all enterprise fraud.

In regards to the specifics of the jab, it certainly was not designed to do any of the things they claimed it would do. That much we know. But was it specifically and actually designed to kill every single person that would take it? I don’t think it is possible yet to go that far. It also potentially gives more credit to the designers than they might deserve.

There are too many variables that remain a mystery. The video makes a good case. But, for what? One shot, two, three, four, five? And what is “as quickly as possible?”

My dad got his first jab in late January 2020, his second in mid March. By mid April he was unable to urinate. By mid May he developed hip and shoulder pain. By mid July he had been diagnosed with Stage 4 metastatic bone cancer, source unknown. By August we moved him to a nursing home, in October to hospice, by mid November he was dead. Killed by the jabs.

But, both of my in-laws are still alive at age 97 and 96. They have been jabbed and twice boosted with zero visible effects. So one would think, that if every needle that went in every arm was going to kill, both of them should have already been dead. Both of these stories are anecdotal of course. But one supports your theory, the other does not. I’m not arguing that the ultimate goal is not to kill a lot of people. I think that is the goal. But we are talking about hundreds if not thousands of variables for each individual person who got jabbed. Some die almost immediately. Some in days, some in weeks, some in months, some will take years. And some, like my in-laws, are destined to die in a relatively short period of time anyway. If the jab was going to kill them they should already be dead. Which brings me all the way back to my original point in my original response. This is a massive experiment. Some people got lesser doses. Some people got graphene. Some people got saline.

Lastly, it only ends when we make it end. And that will not happen until morgues are overflowing and streets are lined with body bags and 1000s and 1000s are dying every day so that the deaths can no longer be hidden. That needs to happen, but unless I’m missing something, we are not anywhere close to that point yet.

Horace the Menace's avatar

It is also likely that even if all jabs contained the spike protein (i.e. there are no saline solutions) that not everyone will die. This stuff is clearly dangerous - but equally clearly most people do not fall over dead within hours of receiving the injection. People react differently. Some people's immune systems cannot handle the vaccine, but presumably many people will fight it off - just like they fight off other poisons and diseases. I'm not aware of any disease which has a 100% fatality rate - why would this be different?

Judy T's avatar

All the deaths from the gene injections will be attributed to whatever virus is said to be circulating at that time. Deaths will reinforce fear of viruses. Trust in gene injections to save them from the virus will intensify. Despite voluminous evidence that should result in people seeing the truth, irrational belief in the Germ Theory will continue until all the Germ Theory believers are dead.

Christine's avatar

I have the same conclusions that you do - my young doctor refuses to die, which is a bit annoying as he supports the jab and everyone having it, which begs the question, do some not get the real thing and they are part of the extermination program, while others are not part of the extermination program and they get killed off quick - either way, it does not matter to me, I have not been jabbed and I won't ever agree to be - that said - the latest blurb from Richard Noakes which I copied and pasted above - this from a scientist, with others, examinations of multiple shots of all of the vaccines (with her Creds) and what "they" have discovered so far - I hope I make my late 90's, but I doubt it, but who can tell, because there won't be much competition to stop me, is my take on things!!

MoodyP's avatar

LOL. Loved your last line. No jab for me. Or my wife. Or my youngest son and his wife. We have been standing in the breach from the start, as I wrote.

My mom died at 94. My dad at 95, but he would still be alive if he had taken my advice and said no thanks to the jab. . My grandma died 6 days short of 100. Her sister lived to 101. My great grandma was born in 1867 and died in 1973. She was 106, I was 18 and a freshman in college. She outlived 3 husbands. I spent every summer until I was 14 on her farm as hired help. No pay. But away from home, a comfy bed, great food, and unforgettable memories. Not to mention what I learned. It was a working farm and although she leased out all the acreage for crops to others, she kept pigs, goats, chickens and 6 dairy cows.

The youngest that any of my grandparents died was 85. So a ton of longevity on both sides of my family.

Given that I’ll likely die young. Which is just how it works. Which will be fine.

Horace the Menace's avatar

The problem with that video is that the presenter may not be honest: https://truthcomestolight.com/questioning-virologist-dr-poornima-waghs-credentials/

I too have been unable to confirm her claims that she attended the institution she claims to have attended, and that she received any PHDs in either virology or immunology.

MoodyP's avatar

Thanks. And yes that indeed was it. As I said I know Jessica Rose has written a couple times about her suspicions that something in the jabs is potentially causing Amyloid Protein formation. Which if true, could be one of the causes of organ failure being seen. Typically in a person with Amyloidosis it’s either the heart or the kidneys that takes the brunt of the excess protein deposits.

Sharine Borslien's avatar

Right on, Kyle. There can be no such thing as "public" "health" without germ theory. So, it's take-down time, and quickly. This kind of global tyranny needs HUGE numbers of people to wake up and stop the CONs' next machinated reset of our paradise which they have invaded and infected with their inversions and perversions.

People also need to know that "government" — along with every industrialized sector of The CONs' Matrix — is a captivating *program* managed by the cushy-job-holding clowns, so I personally think that *alerting* them to our resistance makes them clamp down harder. However, I also know that WE ARE THE POWER that these black magicians and their anti-life technology rivals seek! Without us, they have no source of energy to sustain their pathetic anti-life "existence." That said, we've got to use every tool in our kits to help people awaken from multi-generational slumber.

Keep up your excellent research, writing, and advocacy for LIFE. As we do so, we widen and hone our true spiritual perceptions. Together, we can form a faceted diamond perspective that will handily crush the CONs, once and for all.

Kyle Young's avatar

Thanks Sharine. And thanks for your thoughtful contributions as well.

Judy T's avatar

How RIGHT you are! Destroying Germ Theory will destroy medical tyranny.

In today's Rappoport promo for his paid-subscriber podcasts, he notes that the medical bureaucracy now claims VIRUSES supposedly causing polio and monkeypox are being found in municipal waste water systems. Aside from the fact that this claim is STOOPID, this is NOT a problem for govt to solve. Waste water contains trillions of all kinds of viruses and bacteria and toxins and chemicals and drugs and lead and mercury etal along with H2O. The solution for every home is simple and costs less than $1 trillion dollars. Buy an effective water filter system. The out-of-pocket cost can be as little as $300.

It should be obvious to RFK Jr, Dr. M and the rest of their club that the Germ Theory is the SOLE reason this medical tyranny exists. To end the tyranny, the Germ Theory and Virology MUST be exposed as the fraud they are. The legal case in progress re govt collusion with social media platforms is the beginning of what needs to be done to wake up the masses who are now supporting the tyranny.

Sharine Borslien's avatar

The problem is that most people are so deeply mind-controlled by these fear-based lies that they can't bear to look outside their tiny box existence. And maybe we don't need *everyone* to wake up, but just enough of us to pull the $$$ plug on these systems of control. Say, if Big Pharma and Big Ag were each to lose half of their enormous profits within the next quarter, I'd think there would be big changes. Especially now, as we're heading into the holiday money-spending frenzy. The CONs are already throwing anything and everything into their projectors in order to keep the masses lulled, so we could actually be near a tipping point, but I don't know. They're relentless despite their stupidity, and most people are too lazy and drugged up with their phood, pharmaceuticals/other drugs, and constant need for entertainment to bother with anything else.

Judy T's avatar

Big Pharma is making their enormous profits from all the GOVTS that are buying the vax and then frightening and lying to their citizens to persuade them that the vax will save them from the DEADLY VIRUS. Biden is borrowing or printing the $ to buy millions of the vax and is then giving them away at no cost to the inflation-pressed citizens who can't afford to buy gas for their vehicle to get to work and now have to ride public transportation. In addition to the free vax, the vaxxed gets a free ice-cream cone. This 2-for-Nothing offer is irresistible to the inflation-pressed citizen. The free ice-cream cone can be redeemed upon proof of being vaxxed. Happily, for the inflation-pressed consumer, proof, such as being hospitalized with a serious adverse event, also qualifies the vaxxed for the free ice-cream cone.

Sharine Borslien's avatar

It's a sick, sick system. The fact that people — knowing NOTHING about what is being injected into their bodies because they don't care — will sell out for a doughnut or an ice cream cone is truly pathetic. I have compassion, but it only extends so far.

Judy T's avatar

Another Court Case:

The Court Petition for Injunctive Relief filed by Louisiana Attorney General Landry (link below) is about the separation of powers in Louisiana’s State Constitution. The Petition argues that an executive agency has usurped authority belonging to the legislative branch, its action exceeding that given to the agency by the legislative branch. At issue is a new rule stating that school children of all ages must be vaxxed “in accordance with the dosing schedule, including any booster doses recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), set forth in the applicable Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19), or known variants thereof, to the extent that such vaccines have been fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the individual's age.” The unvaxxed cannot attend school “unless the individual submits a written statement from a physician stating that such vaccination is contraindicated for medical reasons, or the individual or his parent or guardian submits a written dissent.”

The new rule states that (1) Covid is caused by a virus (2) the State will do as the CDC and FDA instructs, and (3) the student can opt out with a written dissent.

Exhibit D, pgs 29-30: The legislative committee report to the governor stated that the LDH proposed rule was unacceptable because it “is outside the scope of authority granted to LDH by the constitution and laws of this state.”

Exhibit E, pgs 31-32: The governor responded saying, “By any measure, the Covid-19 vaccines have been a historic success.” And, “I am allowing this rule to go into effect because it will save lives and help Louisiana to emerge from this pandemic.” The governor, as head of the executive branch, is hereby usurping the authority of the legislative branch.

The governor is a believer in the GERM THEORY. He, like the state’s Dept of Health and the vast majority of the citizenry, believe (1) Viruses cause disease (2) Virus caused diseases are contagious (3) Virus caused diseases are prevented by vaccines. The GERM THEORY and Virology must be exposed as the frauds they are in order to stop the pharmaceutical industry from destroying the health of Americans, particularly the health of children who are subjected to the 72-dose vaccine schedule in order to attend school.

As a result of the Court Petition, the governor rescinded the rule and the lawsuit was dismissed. While this legal action has succeeded, it is likely that the govt will try again, by a route other than the Dept of Health, to promote vaccination.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21154948/studentshotmandate.pdf

Judy T's avatar

COURT UPDATE: Today, Judge Doughty issued a permanent injunction against HHS and its vax & mask mandate re Head Start filed by 24 states. This decision will have a HUGE impact on ALL state vax mandates.

Judge Doughty’s opening paragraph: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elected may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” James Madison, Federalist No. 51, 1788. This case involves the separation of powers addressed by Madison in Federalist 51. Courts are protectors of the United States Constitution and its delegated powers. The separation of powers keeps the three branches equal. If one branch attempts to exceed its constitutional powers, it is the Judicial Branch’s duty to stop it.”

You can read the entire Decision at: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22671189-louisiana-v-becerra-ruling

Judge Doughty will be writing the Decision on the 1st Amendment case re govt collusion with social media platforms.

Judy T's avatar

Judge Doughty wrote:

Pg 3: “This case … is ultimately about the separation of powers under the United States Constitution. Specifically, whether the Agency Defendants, government agencies under the Executive branch, have the authority to impose the Head Start Mandate.”

Pg 5/6: Plaintiffs allege the Agency Defendants: (1) did not have authority to issue the Head Start Mandate; (2) the Head Start Mandate is contrary to law; “

Pg 10: “Louisiana R.S. § 17:170 allows Louisiana students in schools and colleges to opt out of the required vaccines by a written dissent. This statute conflicts with the Head Start Mandate, and Louisiana has standing to enforce its laws.”

CONCLUSION: If the state you live in has a law similar to Louisiana’s, federal mandates regarding ANY vax mandate for ANY citizen is unlawful. Citizens do NOT need a religious or medical exemption or proof that you have “natural immunity.” Citizens do not need ANY excuse to justify refusing the vax. All a citizen need do is say ‘No, I don’t want to be vaxxed and therefore I will NOT be vaxxed.”

I’ve contacted my US House rep to find out if Colorado has a law like Louisiana. If not, then we need to write such a law and get it passed by the state legislature.

Jo Waller's avatar

yay no evidence , no virus - I agree wholeheartedly. ITts interesting to see who are the ones still supporting the uncontrolled invalid virology experiments and continuing the virus narrative of the globalists. https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Secrets-of-Virology-Control-Experiments:e

There is NO evidence of a virus; lab leak, wet market or other wise. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing

No need for invermectin, toxic antivirals, any vaccine, fear, lockdowns, masks or any other nonsense.

Jo

Christine's avatar

Let the facts speak for themselves and you decide if they do.

If mRNA Vaccinated – there are no mRNA in the shots and there never was, it all is a con to get you to have the vaccines with the intention of killing you, as quickly as possible:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/BJqGWMB5uHzI/

Richard has also "suggested a possible one second cure" for those mRNA vaccinated, who now have a 10 digit number when holding an iPhone to the arm, in Bluetooth, that the way to kill the nanotechnology which was injected at the time of getting the vaccine, "might be" to touch a strand of an electric cattle fence with both hands and get the electric jolt (2 or 3 times?) - this might short out the nanotechnology and parasites which rely on the bodies electricity to function, restoring your body to it's original state? prior to mRNA vaccination???

If you don't have a 10 digit number after the jolt or jolts, then theoretically you have shorted out the nanotachnology and a way to monitor that is with your iPhone in Bluetooth - no number, no problem - right?

An alarming number of vaccine recipients suffered from severe and debilitating complications. Growing increasingly concerned, the physician decided to study messenger RNA (mRNA) and its effects on DNA. After speaking with colleagues and conducting numerous experiments, she made a startling discovery. When the Bluetooth setting was activated near immunized individuals, a "unique identification code" appeared on her smartphone’s screen. Each person seemingly contained an internal technological device. During an interview transcribed by Orwell City, Dr. Brandolino shared her startling findings: Mónica Calcedo: The chip. Is that real or a lie? Dr. Brandolino: It’s a nanoprocessor. I say again that it is in plain view for those who want to see the micrographs of the electron microscope study made by Dr. Kalcker. It’s clearly seen in the magnification: a small, perfect, quadrangular, precise-edged, metallic corpuscle which is the same as any nanoprocessor in nanotechnology-responsive devices. That nanoprocessor is driven from a 4G Plus or 5G antenna. That is, all G technology is the same. The difference lies in that the packet of information that an antenna can transmit, is much larger in 4G Plus and 5G, 6G, and 7G. All that compact information is handled by a nanoprocessor— in a device which will be just inside our cells. By having Morgellons in the polyethylene glycol, they’re self-reproducing, it’s self-replicating. But because it’s in graphene… Graphene is a catalyst and, as I explained to you, makes that cell resonate with the 5G antenna and the microwaves of human thought. Can you understand that? There’s a nanoprocessor driven by a 5G antenna that goes directly to the workings of our brain.

There is an element of risk in everything and you must understand that, however, don't try it if you have a Pacemaker and DO NOT short your body out on household electricity as THAT will kill you, bearing in mind the Police Taser is much more powerful than an electric cattle fence, as a possible final resort

Nothing ventured, nothing gained?

Richard Noakes, copied and posted on by me C

serafino bueti's avatar

Thanks, Kyle, for the article and the link to SFHF. It's easy to send a message to your reps. I really would like MY wages to increase by 300+%. We really are living in bizarre times.

Kyle Young's avatar

Thanks serafino

Antisandman's avatar

Hurrah! You have thrown out the chaff. What remains are kernels of truth. Fear is how the .00001%, the billionaire class now and royalty earlier, control the 99%. They are deathly afraid the 99% will awaken. The 99% must be kept ignorant and in fear else they might rediscover the uses of the pitchfork, torch, guillotine and noose and rise up and use them.

A true government of, for and by the people would make sure that everyone is well nourished. I think that is unlikely and is why I am trying to establish a self sufficient community in Ecuador. I think Ecuador and other places along the equator are the best possible for surviving global warming. The coriolis effect and Hadley Cells will insulate from the toxic effects of the probable sea level rise and collapse of the grid and many Fukushimas that will likely suffocate the Northern hemisphere. Notice I use likely and probable. Nothing is certain. Global warming and sea level rise can be averted if there is a massive conversion to regenerative agriculture. Not likely to happen because corporations are not in it for several generations. The control of agriculture is manipulated by non human actors with no empathy. So best to plan for the worst while hoping for the best,

Kyle Young's avatar

Thanks.

Well nourished and diligent about lifestyle and food toxins, which are hopefully less of a issue where you are.

Antisandman's avatar

Among the reasons I chose Ecuador was that Nature has rights in the Constitution and GMOs were prohibited to be grown or imported. As a lawyer friend says the Constitution is poetry and I think much like our own is decorative. The 1% use it for their protection and use it as a weapon against the 99%. Toxins are less of an issue here but still require diligence. Evidence of use of imported GMO soy bean feed is everywhere and is in the usual processed food. The shelves are stocked with seed oils and margarines. Butter is not in most small grocery stores. When asking for butter I am often pointed to margarine. Butter is being made on the small farm where I rent now, 3 years after I moved here. I am the Crazy Gringo who makes yoghurt from the A2 butter fat rich milk produced by the brahmas on the coast. The Highlands' cows are Holstein freaks. More volume less nutrients. The whole of civilization is poisoned by th 1% so diligence is required every where.

Judy T's avatar

You read Ecuador's Constitution! You're the 1 in a million to have done so. And an ex-pat to boot. And yet, in violation of its Constitution, Ecuador imports GMO products. And the legal system ignores/allows this violation to continue. Eventually, custom rules, despite what the Constitution allows or forbids. Constitutions are written to hold govt accountable to the people, and to do so, its principles and laws must be adhered to by both the govt and its citizens.

Small farmers are being squeezed. Ideally, they would band together, pool their dollars, hire an attorney, file a lawsuit against the govt for not enforcing the Constitution, win the suit, be reimbursed all legal costs plus damages. Big Ag loses. Regenerative farming wins. Govt is embarrassed. Politicians supporting Big Ag are voted out of office. It can be done. People have to defend their rights - or lose them.

Antisandman's avatar

I will send this on to my lawyer friend. The Ecuadorian Constitution has over 600 amendments in 14 years as opposed to 26 over 200 years in the US. Article II Section 2 clause 2 of the US Constitution states that ratified treaties are the supreme law of the land over all state and federal laws saving the Constitution itself. The Supreme Court has at least twice been presented with cases concerning violations of treaties. They have refused to rule. I challenge you to find me more than 2 treaties the US has not violated. There are almost 400 with sovereign indian nations like the Lakota; all have been violated. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo with Mexico, according to my reading, states that there can be border crossing restrictions on the flow of goods and services but not on people. Suited the 1% at the time in need of labor but not wanting competition. NAFTA is an agreement so is unconstitutional according to the treaty. In other words there are no illegal Mexicans in the US, citizen or not.

As teenagers, lots of Southwesterners in the 60s used to drive over the border for access to booze. Many roads over the border had no crossings. You knew when you were in Mexico; the pavement ended and the signs changed language. To drive across the Canadian border required only a valid drivers license for the driver and no ID for the passengers. I think the 1% are intent on slowly removing our freedoms. They know it cannot be done too quickly else a revolt. They do not want the frogs hopping away.

Judy T's avatar

Re "The 99% must be kept ignorant and in fear ..." That's the task assigned to the media.

Dr. Peter McCullough has written a book (to be published in Nov) about the Covid enabled crimes. A CHD article last week detailed new discoveries about the vax that prompted a commenter to inquire as to WHEN our side will put all the evidence accumulated to date into a lawsuit and go to court. The commenter bluntly asks when will our side Stop Talking and Start Acting. Aside from the fact that CHD and Dr.M etal are perpetual fence sitters Waiting For Godot, presumably, even with all the documented evidence, NOW isn’t the time to ACT. Presumably, the fence sitters believe the Court of Public Opinion will reject all the evidence as being “misinformation.”

“Misinformation” has ensnared Americans and prevents them from knowing the truth and rejecting the lies. Just as in Hitler’s Germany, the mass media is controlled by a government/corporate/fascist combine. Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda chief, is reported to have said, “[It’s] vitally important for the STATE to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie …” George Washington is known to have said, “If the freedom of speech may be taken away, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.” Tyranny triumphs when dissent is crushed. Freedom flourishes when speech is unhindered. Therefore, presumably, before we can go to Court, we have to change public opinion.

Before the Constitution itself is abolished by Biden and our feckless Congress, we can accomplish this goal by abolishing censorship in media. Censorship is undeniably a violation of the 1st Amendment, and social media platforms – today’s public square and “press” – will be ordered to allow ALL opinions to be heard. A lawsuit is in progress that will restore free speech to social media and prevent govt interference with this Right guaranteed to the People by our Constitution. This lawsuit appears to have the right stuff in it, as detailed in the linked Complaint, to succeed in this mission.

https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Missouri-v.-Biden-Amended-Complaint-w-Exhibits-8-2-2022.pdf

Kyle Young's avatar

Well said Judy. Thanks for keeping us up to date on the lawsuits. I've been going through them as time allows.

Judy T's avatar

Article from Dr. M re the 1st Amendment lawsuit is on CHD:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/federal-agencies-censor-social-media-cola/

Reading the Complaint (linked above) is recommended to judge for yourself the extant of the collusion. This will lead one to consider the REASON the govt is determined to squelch dissenting opinion. Is the goal of govt censorship to PROTECT an ignorant citizenry from "misinformation" that conflicts with their claim that VIRUSES are deadly and VACCINES will protect them? Or is the govt goal SOMETHING ELSE?

Kyle Young's avatar

I'm going with... all of the above, including things we don't even know about.

Horace the Menace's avatar

I agree that virus theory is problematic and much of it is unproven.

However I do have the following problem with dispensing with germ theory altogether.

It does appear that some vaccines reduce the incidence of the diseases they are designed to protect against. The data for the measles vaccine appear to show this pretty clearly.

Please note that

(a) I am well aware that measles wasn't an especially dangerous disease when the vaccine was introduced

(b) I do believe that the MMR vaccine causes harm alongside its ability to protect against a fairly harmless disease.

(c) I don't believe that the measles vaccine delivers a net benefit, and therefore I believe that no-one should take it.

Despite all of that however, the vaccine does appear to "succeed" in reducing subsequent infection with measles.

How do you explain the apparent success of this vaccine in protecting against a specific disease if germs and viruses (or something similar) are not real?

Also - I don't know anything about this area at all - but are you also suggesting that antibodies don't exist? And if they do exist, what are they for if viruses don't exist?

Kyle Young's avatar

As I've explained previously, diseases have arisen and subsided throughout human history, for thousands of years before the invention of vaccines. Many independent researchers agree that measles would have completely disappeared by now if it had not been for the highly profitable, ongoing measles fear porn and vaccination programs.

Antibodies to what?

Horace the Menace's avatar

Which independent researchers agree that measles would have completely disappeared by now without a vaccine? Can you point me to some information here?

I have seen plenty of charts showing that fatalities and other serious consequences of these diseases were disappearing, but no chart showing me that incidences were declining. And my own experience, pre-vaccine, does not merit such a conclusion either.

Measles is first recorded over 1,000 years ago and mumps was recorded (by the Chinese) almost three millenia ago. Neither were on a downward trend before the vaccine. Yes fatalities were on a downward trend, but incidences were not.

When I was a child, and for dozens of generations prior to that, every child got measles, and mumps. I grew up in the UK where takeup of the vaccines was initially very limited and everyone I knew still got both diseases. I had them. All my cousins had them. All my schoolfriends had them. Everyone. And that was in the 1970s.

Then within a decade everyone started to get the vaccines and both diseases almost disappeared.

And my second question is - how do you explain diseases spontaneously arising and disappearing without germ theory? That in and of itself is hard to explain in a way that stands up to scrutiny without germ theory.

So I think my points are still valid.

1. I agree there are big problems with virus theory. I suspect that virus "genomes" are entirely fabricated. I don't think HIV has anything to do with AIDS. I suspect SARS-CoV-2 probably doesn't exist anywhere outside of a computer. I don't think PCR and lateral flow tests detect anything more than that people are sick, and not even that reliably. I suspect that medical labs would indeed fail Dr. Bailey's suggested experiment.

2. Even so, germ theory still provides an explanation for a number of observations which are hard to explain any other way. For example

- the apparent success of some vaccines in reducing the incidence of the diseases they are targeted at.

- antibodies. You ask "antibodies to what?" - but that's my question. If germs don't exist, what are antibodies? Or are you saying antibodies don't exist either?

Perhaps it will turn out that germs do exist, but that they operate by some other mechanism(s) than the way viruses are currently thought to work.

We must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Judy T's avatar

Dismantling the CDC is a good beginning. Even if Fauci's fiefdom at the NIAID was dismantled, that's not enough to stop what the MIC is doing. Health care is NOT the responsibility of govt. Health care is NOT a Constitutional guaranteed RIGHT. Therefore, the NIH and other health agencies conducting or funding research or promoting drugs, vaccines, and insurance should also be dismantled.

Speaking of insurance, according to a doctor in a letter to Steve Kirsch, the goal of govt is to impose socialized medicine within the next 5 years. This means govt will pay all medical costs it considers appropriate. Govt will take over the function now performed by insurance companies. Are insurance companies OK with being put out of the health insurance business? Is Jane Fonda in favor of socialized medicine? Miss Fonda, unfortunately, has non-Hodgkins lymphoma. She's on record as saying it's unfortunate that people not as fortunate as herself in having a super abundance of disposable income must accept whatever their insurance company will pay for. She feels sorry for people less fortunate than herself who don't receive the BEST cutting edge medical treatment available, like she gets, because she can afford the BEST the MIC has to offer when others can't. Will socialized medicine provide the average Jack and Jill the BEST drugs and surgeons and hospitals with the highest reputations like Miss Fonda is receiving? Will the citizens welcome socialized medicine? Is having someone other than themselves pay for treatment all the citizens want when it comes to health care? Supposedly, they're happy with Obamacare, and so supposedly, they'll be happy with what the govt has planned next for them.

Kyle Young's avatar

The lines between the mic, insurance and the government are already so blurred by social constructs. If the guberment does take it over, the same rules will apply - only approved, mic methods and meds will be allowed. Same control, different entity.

My guess is the insurance industry will be cut in.

ST's avatar

There is a lot of money made by keeping the virus cult alive. Most of the people I know totally believe in germ theory and that viruses are dangerous. Throughout this “pandemic”, the media has kept on changing the “virus” story so that the public interest in viruses never waned. I do not believe that viruses (or germs) cause disease, so I am glad that I have found your substack. Thank you Kyle.

Kyle Young's avatar

Thanks for finding me. And welcome!

Christine's avatar

Concept: Before I can provide you with a concept, I have to understand the concept myself:

All tap water, no matter which home you draw it from, is the same and it comes from the same storage facility, irrespective of the name of the company which provides it, or the advertising they use to sell their brand to you, over their competitors.

OK:

The vaccines are the same, they all have the same ingredients. The boosters are the same, they all have the same ingredients and they all come from the same storage facility, irrespective of the name of the company which provides them, or the advertising they use to sell their brand to you, over their competitors - none of the vaccines have any mRNA particles in them.

SO:

The purpose of the vaccines is the same – they are intended to “chemically” kill each of you, as efficiently and as quickly as possible and that is a fact.

PROOF:

See this video by a scientist with credentials provided, who confirms the above: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BJqGWMB5uHzI/

The vaccines are like the injected kill shots, to terminate the lives of those who killed and were given a death sentence, after their trial - except you did not get a trial – your death is predetermined for you.

I have also "suggested a possible one second cure" for those mRNA vaccinated, that the way to kill the nanotechnology and parasites which were injected at the time of getting the vaccines, "might be" to touch a strand of an electric cattle fence with both hands and get the electric jolt (2 or 3 times?) - this "might" short out the nanotechnology and parasites which rely on the bodies electricity to function, restoring your body to it's original state, prior to the Covid pandemic and vaccination. – like with Lyme Disease – thankyou Rosalind McGill - who also suggested it might work for Cancer too!!

If you don't have a 10 digit number after the jolt or jolts, then theoretically you have shorted out the injected nanotechnology and parasites and a way to monitor that, is with your iPhone in Bluetooth - no number, no problem and you don’t die until your time is up from natural causes, not vaccine ones - right?

There is an element of risk in everything and you must understand that, however, don't try it if you have a Pacemaker and DO NOT short your body out on household electricity as THAT will kill you, bearing in mind the Police Taser is much more powerful than an electric cattle fence, as a possible final resort

Nothing ventured, nothing gained?

Richard Noakes

I picked this off one of Richard Noakes’s posting websites – just passing it along!!

Larry Cox's avatar

I have been immersed in a lot of "conspiracy theory" writings and videos recently, and my head is spinning with all the information.

On 9/11 a lengthy series of videos created by James Corbett about Al-Qaeda was aired on the No Lies Radio website by Richard Gage and his group.

I had recently finished reading Sean David Morton's Sands of Time III, which covers a part of the secret space program during (roughly) the 1990s.

Then yesterday Courtney Brown released a remote viewing project on the Battle of Dulce. His target was located in 1979, but that's not the only time there has been violence under Archuleta Mesa. Morton describes in detail a battle that probably occurred several years later.

There is so much being kept secret that our latest problem with "COVID" and the longer standing problem of Germ Theory seem to pale in comparison.

But hopefully if enough people pick apart enough of the lies, we will begin to get an good idea of what we need to do about it. At this point I'm still not sure we can save the game of being human on Earth, but perhaps we can buy ourselves enough time to make a more organized exit.

Your title is Transhumanism, and I know that one theory out there is that these jabs are being used to prime us for some sort of "AI" or other technology that will take us over at some future time.

But my first contact with Transhumanism was many years ago (we are coming up on ten years after December 2012 - remember that?) when someone pointed their readers to a website named http://www.2045.com/. That website still exists but seems to have gone dormant. When I sent a comment to their scientific division that you couldn't transfer a personality to an avatar because the personality is an immortal spiritual being, they replied "never contact us again." The website was just part of this propaganda war. I have come across several like that.

Kyle Young's avatar

Death (to lies) by a thousand cuts.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 18, 2022
Comment deleted
Kyle Young's avatar

Thanks wilnav. I know it doesn't seem like much, but the thing is, the power elite are terrified of us because there are so many of us and so few of them. If we band together by the millions, email campaign like this could not be ignored... the wake up call would be sent.

Judy T's avatar

Sure, I’ll send emails to my US Reps and Senators. If hundreds of thousands of Colorado citizens tell their Reps DON’T DO IT, I agree they’ll pay attention. But will they DO what their constituents who care enough to write them about their concerns ask them to do? Or will they vote as their “conscience” or party leader tells them to vote? Our politicians are like the hypnotized gullible ignorant general public as well as most doctors and scientists. They all believe VIRUSES cause DISEASE. They believe the whole wide world is going to be attacked by a steady stream of deadly VIRUSES, one after another, each deadlier than its predecessor. And they believe it’s the govt’s DUTY to PROTECT ITS CITIZENS from being attacked by VIRUSES. Because govts CARE about their citizens, they’ve swung into action and declared WAR against VIRUSES. Fighting wars is expensive but what’s another trillion added to the $30 trillion national debt, VIRUSES have to be defeated. Even if our nation hasn’t got 10 cents in the bank, it will spend whatever it takes to fight this war to save humanity from VIRUSES. I expect our politicians will ENTHUSIASTICALLY, even almost unanimously, vote to FUND the WAR on VIRUSES and give Biden everything he requests to WIN this WAR.

Speaking of contacting our politicians, I wrote Newsom re the 5 CA health bills I asked him more or less politely not to sign, and received this FORM email reply on all 5 bills: “The Governor values the ideas and concerns of constituents like you who take the initiative to actively participate in your government. Feedback like yours helps ensure that we are addressing the most pressing concerns of Californians. With your help and partnership, we can build a California for All. Sincerely, Constituent Affairs Office of Governor Gavin Newsom.” What Newsom is REALLY wants to know is how many are 'pro' or 'con' the bill. So interested is he that you're not allowed to submit your comment without clicking one of those 2 buttons.

Once the District Court hands down its decision upholding the 1st Amendment in the ongoing lawsuit, we will then be able to talk freely on social media and teach the unlearned about germ biology. Here’s what they – including doctors and scientists – need to know: VIRUSES don’t cause disease. Being afraid of harmless viruses is STOOPID. And since VIRUSES don’t cause disease, getting vaxxed against VIRUSES is STOOPID. Further, getting a GENE INJECTION to protect yourself from harmless VIRUSES is REE-LEE STOOPID. If all the new info from formerly banned scientists and doctors now allowed to speak freely on social media does not convince you – the deluded – that you’ve been lied to, if you continue to believe the lies, if you continue to get vaxxed, if you have a serious adverse event and blame the VIRUS and not the GENE INJECTION, then you’re a very special kind of STOOPID.

P.S. Plz pardon all the caps. I got carried away.