why centralized energy is a bad idea - part 2

we cannot be free when we are slaves to a centralized economy

The west can no longer point to communist countries and say, look at them, they have no freedom of the press, they have no medical choice, their people are not free. The west is now just as guilty of those things. Stella Moris, wife of Julian Assange, paraphrased from an interview with Russell Brand

Welcome back to the sietch all of you freedom loving heretics! Thank you for holding water for me.

Sol Luckman, over at Uncensored Updates and Uploads, is compiling a list of writers who question germ theory. He calls this effort the Terrain Train. I had no idea there were so many other Substack writers who share this viewpoint - 27 so far.

🚂 Calling All Those Questioning Germ Theory! Please Join October’s TERRAIN TRAIN!

onward

A few insightful writers, researchers and commentators have been calling events of the past three years spiritual warfare. As regular readers know, I agree. Why refer to it this way? Because millions of people are being injured and killed on this battle field yet, not a single piece of hot lead is responsible. While it seems apparent that the battlefield of this war is taking place in the hearts and minds of the innocent masses, the results - millions injured and killed - compare to some of the worst hot wars ever fought.

As will be pointed out, the ability to conduct such a war did not exist 75 years ago. But the technologies and the centralization of those technologies, and more importantly, our dependence on those technologies and that centralization, has now reached a point that makes this type of control and eugenics warfare possible.

Nearly every aspect of our society has become dependent on the centralized, corporate control of nearly everything, all of which is completely dependent on one critical important thing, centralized, corporate, entropic energy. Centralized, corporate, tech systems that run on centralized, corporate, entropic energy are being used to, among other things, convince people that viruses exist, that they cause disease, and that vaccines are the solution. This same paradigm - create a problem and offer an even more centralized, controlled, profitable solution - is being used in all aspects of society. We see it with the recent attacks on the Nord Stream pipeline, which are being used to steer the masses to the preferred centralized, corporate energy solution. We also see it in the artificial creation of food shortages which are being used to usher in the “you will will eat bugs and fake meat and be happy” paradigm. Dependency on centralized entropy is at the heart of it all. Why is this approach being used? Because extraction of entropic sources of energy can be controlled by a small handful of people to squeeze a lot of profit from the masses over a very long period of time. This paradigm also offers those who ‘own’ those energy sources a way to wield a lot of power and control.

But the big advantage of entropic energy resources is thier advantage of being used up. Wait, that doesn’t make any sense.

The advantage is two fold. It can be made to appear to be running out, which artificially drives up the cost, which means ever greater profit. Secondly, it has to be constantly replaced, which translates into repeat business, which lies at the core of all entropic business models. This is why modern medicine is so far off track with its vaccines that need constant boosters to supposedly, remain effective, and its ongoing creation of phony viruses to stoke the fear porn and get people to take ever more profitable jabs. This is also why modern medicine does not seek to cure underlying causative factors of illness and instead merely treats symptoms, which does nothing to heal, but works very well to insure repeat business.

This centralized entropic energy/tech paradigm is the primary weapon being wielded by the dark forces waging this spiritual battle. Breaking free from this paradigm is as simple as understanding how we got to this point and how easy it is to decentralize.

the heart of the matter

For as long as we can all remember we have been told to think that the entropic pathway - the idea that we need to take a complex energy source and break it down to liberate the energy within for our use - is the only pathway. This is programming and it has been taught in our so-called educational systems for as long as any of us alive today can remember. This system, the one that says we are to be dependent on centralized, outside sources - what are now typically large corporations - has proven that it does not have our best interests at heart. We need to abandon this corrupt system in favor of a decentralized model that is, at the very least, less entropic, and at the very best, stable and hand picked to suit ones particular needs.

proof of corruption

We know this system is corrupt because it can be easily shown to be so. Melissa Fleming, Undersecretary General for communications at the United Nations, recently spoke at the WEF’s Sustainable Development Impact Meetings 2022, specifically, the subgroup called Tackling Disinformation. In the video below, Melissa Fleming goes into detail explaining that the UN has been holding meetings with Google to put official UN climate related information at the top of Google search engine and restrict access to information the UN deems disinformation (about 8 minutes in). She claims “we own the science” so we should determine what people see.

Hey Melissa, I own some beach front property in Kansas you might want to buy.

On the panel with Melissa Fleming was Rachel Smolkin, senior VP at CNN who was introduced as a leading expert on disinformation. Given CNN’s superb track record of spreading disinformation, I would have to say Rachel Smolkin is indeed, an expert.

Also on the panel was Claire Wardal, a professor at Brown University, proclaimed to be an advisor on how to combat disinformation.

This entire program provides an excellent example of how these elites shift the blame for the “climate crises” from themselves to all of us. The reality is, 71% of global emissions are produced by just 100 companies, primarily fossil fuel producers. On top of that, the richest 1% cause double the CO2 emissions of the poorest 50%. Given that most billionaires have their own private jet they can fly anywhere at any time, especially to attend meetings at the WEF, it becomes easy to see how they quickly rack-up their CO2 production.

Why are the UN and Google allowed to doctor the results of CO2 and climate information? Is this legal? At the very least it subverts our 1st Amendment rights.

it’s ubiquitous

Because all aspects of society - food, clothing, medicine, housing and so on - are now dependent on centralized, entropic, energy sources, let’s take a close look at this system to see how it fails us and what we can do to decentralize.

All of our energy sources are at some level, entropic, but some are more so than others. Some entropic energy sources are also renewable. The first one listed below is an example of the latter.

Humans long ago began to burn wood for warmth and cooking. Then coal was discovered, then oil, then we began to split the atom to glean nuclear power. Additionally, over the past 140 years, a series of discoveries led to harnessing the suns very slow entropy to produce energy through photovoltaics, a system that mimics photosynthesis.

All of these systems have drawbacks.

forests as an energy source

If there are too many people using the same forest to cook food and keep warm in a cold climate, the forest can be cleared away before it has a chance to regenerate. This has been the case in much of the world where vast forests that once covered the landscape were long ago used up and never replanted. Some of those deforested areas have seen desertification set-in due to the lack of historic interactions that occur between forests and the atmosphere to produce rain. China understood this decades ago and began replanting much of the forest higher up the water shed of the Yellow River. Thanks to this program, they’re now seeing rainfall patterns return to areas that were once suffering desertification. Similar results are occurring with reforestation projects in the Sahel region of Africa.

The primary advantage of wood as an energy source is that if one lives near a forest, sufficient quantities can be harvested by an individual or a family to fulfill their energy needs.

my tiny project

I’ve seen similar results here on the 23 acres of overgrazed land I bought nearly 25 years ago. This land was previously part of 15,000 acre ranch (with several million acres of leased public land), that, like many large ranches these days, serves as a tax write-off for big investors who know nothing about land stewardship. Consequently, this land was badly degraded by decades of running excessive amounts of cattle on marginal grazing lands. The result was terrible erosion, more runoff when it did rain, less rainfall, less recharge of the aquifer, dropping ground water levels and a major decrease in forage for domestic livestock as well as native fauna like deer, javelina and pronghorn. Combined, this degradation is known as desertification.

Over the past 35 years a local group of us have fought with the public land departments to get them to hold ranchers to their public land grazing allotment levels. This has reduced herd numbers to more sustainable levels, which has allowed the millions of acres of wildness that surrounds my farm to begin recovering. We also monitor the static water levels in our wells so we can determine if recharge is dropping or increasing (it’s been holding steady, in spite of ongoing drought conditions).

After building hundreds of land based rainwater catchments on my place, I’ve watched as this overgrazed land has recovered and now produces about 20% more forage than it was capable of doing when I bought it. This, in turn, has encouraged the return of majestic fauna to my land. And yes, that also resulted in an encounter with a mountain lion. The land is returning to its original God-given state because the imposed entropy stemming from a centralized approach to cattle production (cow/calf operations that feed CAFO’s) has been curtailed.

One of the benefits of returning my farm to its original state is that this farm is now capable of regenerating all of my home energy needs from the native mesquite and catclaw bosque, for the rest of my life. In fact there is even enough to incorporate large quantities into hügelkultur projects. The burgeoning population of wild, edible and medicinal plants is another benefit.

coal

The primary advantage of using coal as a replacement for wood is its abundance. The primary disadvantage of coal is the difficulty of getting it from the earth. Doing so in sufficient quantities to supply large populations requires a large investment in equipment and transportation infrastructure, whether that’s transporting the coal or the power produced by burning it in centralized power plants. To get this volume of coal from the ground requires a big financial investment in heavy, very expensive, specialized equipment. Here is where corporate centralization is more than happy to step in and take over. But once we become dependent on a large entity for our energy needs, we also fall prey to their power and control.

oil

We are all aware of the dark history of the oil industry and the numerous lawless shenanigans they have pulled off over the past 125 years. As I’ve pointed numerous times, the oil rich Rockefeller family alone is in large part responsible for the current centralized, corporatized boondoggle known as the pharmaceutical industry.

For the latest Nord Stream pipeline shenanigans in the petro arena, see this previous post.

the big whodunnit - part 1

nuclear

Perhaps the ultimate example of centralized, corporate, entropic energy is nuclear power.

Nuclear power has so many liabilities it’s hard to know where to begin describing them.

I suppose the obvious starting point are the four best known accidents at major nuclear power facilities around the world. These are certainly not the only four, but they are the most notorious ones.

One of the earliest accidents was the Windscale Piles fire that burned for three days at the Windscale Piles nuclear power plant in Cumberland, England in October of 1957, spreading nuclear fallout across the UK and much of Europe. No one was evacuated and little followup was done. In other words, it was a big coverup. This plant had a previous record of leaks and radiation escapes during its sordid existence, all of which culminated in this fire.

The big US incident occurred on March 28, 1979 on the #2 reactor at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant when a valve mistakenly closed causing that reactor to overheat. In typical centralized, boondoggle fashion, authorities didn’t learn until weeks and years later the full truth of what had happened.

In a 2009 article, Gilinsky (NRC Commissioner) wrote that it took five weeks to learn that "the reactor operators had measured fuel temperatures near the melting point".[60] He further wrote: "We didn't learn for years—until the reactor vessel was physically opened—that by the time the plant operator called the NRC at about 8:00 a.m., roughly half of the uranium fuel had already melted."

Children playing with matches comes to mind.

In April 1986, one of the four cores at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine melted down and caused an explosion. In the weeks that followed 30 people died. In the months that followed another 134 people died. In the years that followed, more have died. Even the WHO, in a 2005 report, estimated that as many as 4,000 may have died from Chernobyl radiation. Other estimates range upwards of 60,000, but no one knows exactly how many because, like elites everywhere (including those who are censoring me and others who speak truth to power) the Russian and Ukranian elites pushing this and all other centralized industries, fear the truth and do everything they can to prevent it from coming out.

On March 11, 2011, the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami caused extensive damage to the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Fukushima Japan, causing a massive release of radiation into the atmosphere and the pacific ocean (the latter is ongoing). According a London based consultant on radioactivity, Dr. Ian Fairlie -

… between 2011 and 2015, about 2,000 died  from the effects of evacuations, ill-health and suicide related to the disaster; furthermore, an estimated 5,000 will most likely face lethal cancer in the future, and that is just the tip of the iceberg.What makes matters even worse, the nuclear disaster and subsequent radiation exposure lies at the root of the longer term health effects, such as cancers, strokes, CVS (cyclic vomiting syndrome) diseases, hereditary effects and many more.

Perhaps the most scary legacy of Fukushima are the alarming number of reports of birth defects since the accident.

http://www.opensourcetruth.com/fukushima-birth-defects/

https://www.davidwolfe.com/birth-defects-stillbirths-miscarriages-rise-fukushima-radiation/

https://oye.news/news/world-news/fukushima-birth-defects/

https://www.unknowncountry.com/headline-news/is-fukushima-causing-birth-defects-in-us-infants/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/japan-fukushima-disaster-linked-infant-complex-congenital-heart-disease-health/

As was pointed out in the previous post about the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, any type of centralized, entropic power supply is susceptible to sabotage. As long as attacks of this sort remain few and far between, the elites running these entropic operations don’t have to worry, insurance will pay for damages and repairs. However, if multiple attacks occur over a short period of time, insurance companies will not be able to keep up with the expenditures and will be forced to declare bankruptcy, which will leave those running the entropic energy show in a weakened state, which will leave everyone dependent on them in the cold and dark.

Every nuclear power plant ever built has had massive cost overruns. According to ARS Technica -

The basic numbers are grim. The typical plant built after 1970 had a cost overrun of 241 percent—and that's not considering the financing costs of the construction delays.

Those costs are not borne by the contractors building the plant or the utility company paying for it. No, those costs are foisted upon those who are forced to pay for that now exorbitantly expensive electricity, Joe the plumber and Jill the school teacher.

Then there is the issue of nuclear waste. No one has yet determined how and where to dump the tons of radioactive waste that nuclear plants generate every week, some of which remains dangerously radioactive for thousands of years. A number of waste disposal sites have been proposed in the US, but every time a site gets proposed, the local population, understandably, rises up and says, “not in my back yard” (voice of experience).

One of the biggest issues with nuclear waste is finding a location that is geologically stable over the many thousands of years it takes for some forms of radio isotopes to decay to harmless levels. The US Department of Energy’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad NM is scheduled to close in 2024, but no future location has been identified, let alone prepared, because… no one wants it. This “pilot” site has been accepting nuclear waste from 10 different locations since 1999. WIPP is currently pursuing legal avenues to extend the site.

Spent nuclear fuel rods are a whole ‘nuther problem. There is still no solution for storing spent fuel rods. Currently, most are being stored in cooling ponds located on the site of the nuclear power plant where they were used. None of these plants were designed to accommodate long term storage of spent fuel rods. All are accidents waiting to happen.

In spite of all of this, with the manufactured energy crises looming over us, nuclear energy is once again being touted as an option. Why? Because it’s claimed to have a small carbon footprint, which, in the eyes of those who believe this phony pitch, makes it “green”.

This is, of course, a giant pile of bull hooey. The production of cement alone, involves firing certain types of stone in a kiln to make the dry powder known as cement. Not only does the firing process put a large amount of CO2 into the atmosphere, the process of firing the stone drives CO2 out of the stone into the atmosphere. In fact the worldwide production of cement amounts to 8% of CO2 emissions, with a large amount of this going to build, not only centralized nuclear power plants, but centralized power plants of any kind.

Because cement serves as a decent radiation barrier, the amount of cement needed to construct a nuclear power plant is especially troublesome. A small reactor requires a concrete raft 120’ by 150’ to a depth of 11’. This is heavily reinforced with steel - itself a massive CO2 maker - in both directions. The walls are typically made with super dense (140psi) reinforced concrete. One small turbine hall required 35,000 cubic yards of concrete. All of that is just one small part of one small nuclear power plant built in 1961! And I haven’t even touched on all the carbon that gets generated mining the vast amount of copper and other metals needed for the transformers and power lines, power line poles and so on. All of that comes to an unfathomable amount of carbon production. And yet, we are told that nuclear energy is a ‘green’ power source.

One of my guides in determining the viability, or lack thereof, of any large scale system is… who is endorsing it. If it’s endorsed by that ultimate example of corporate, centralized power and control, the WEF, then it has to be bad. You guessed it, Klaus Schwab’s WEF endorses nuclear power. This comes as no surprise because some of the corporations that pay big bucks to be members of the WEF are heavily invested in entropic forms of the centralized electricity.

Lest we fail to understand the scope of investment and power behind the imposition of nuclear power upon us, the largest investment fund management company in the world, BlackRock, announced this past January that it was joining forces with a group of other investors to form Climate Action 100+, a group that now represents 41 trillion in investments aimed at “protecting the climate”.

Here is what NEI says about BlackRocks investment.

While reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to a low-carbon economy will involve more than the electricity sector, it still makes up 28 percent of emissions. When you consider that going carbon-free in other sectors like transportation or industry will require more electricity, generating power as cleanly as possible becomes even more important. For this reason, nuclear energy—which provides more than 55 percent of our current carbon-free electricity—plays a major role in holding down carbon emissions.

As further proof of the dangerous people behind this push towards nuclear power we need to look no further than our favorite boogeyman, Bill Gates who is now Chairman of the Board for Terra Power “a nuclear innovation company”. Here is an earlier piece on the central role Gates plays in these matters.

shedding revealed

Over the past three years we’ve seen what happens when people like Gates, the Rockefeller’s and other giant investors with ties to eugenics agendas, invest vast sums in pharmaceutical companies and vaccine research… we end up with a large culling of the worlds population by jab induced death. Are we missing something with this latest push for nuclear power? Have we not learned lessons from past mistakes. Or is the old paradigm that the problem can be solved with new technology still holding sway? Have we not learned that lesson as well? We were told that the problem with wood was, it was running out, that we needed to advance to the new technologies using coal. When coal proved to be problematic we were told we needed to move to the new technologies of oil and gas. When those technologies proved to be problematic we were told that we need to move to the new technology of nuclear power. When that technology proved to be problematic we stopped building nuclear power plants for decades. Now we’re being told that new technologies exist for nuclear power and that we need to move to them to reduce carbon emissions.

Where does it end?

It ends with us taking control of our lives and doing everything we can to sever our ties to as many forms of centralized power as we can. Next week we’ll take a close look at some of those options.