does the covid virus exist? #2

intellectual phase locking and other 'scientific' nonsense

“Health happens all of the time. Disease only happens when there is a failure of health. These aren’t diseases that are attacking humanity. These are symptoms of a collapse of fundamental health in our species.” Dr. Zack Bush

Howdy all of you wonderfully wild and woolly, freedom loving, free thinking, secular cowboys and cowgirls! Thanks for all the free subscriptions and likes!

As long as the previous piece was, it barely scratched the surface of this complex topic. And no, I don’t intend to turn my full attention to this topic from now on - there are much more qualified people who are already doing a superb job of that. But I do want to present more information today that highlights the faulty nature of the research upon which the existence of viruses and their causative nature rests.

rupert sheldrake - the science delusion

In a banned TED Talk, scientist Rupert Sheldrake described a conversation he had with a physicist who deals with ‘constants’ like time and the speed of light. While looking at some old literature Sheldrake had noticed that the speed of light had changed from 1928 to 1945. He asked the physicist about this and the guy was quite upset that he had discovered this. Rupert asked him if the numbers were fudged and the physicist said, “Oh we don’t like to use the term fudging. We prefer to use the term intellectual phase locking.” Rupert asked him if this intellectual phase locking was still being employed in terms of the speed of light and the physicist said, “Oh no, that’s no longer a problem. We solved that by fixing the definition in 1972”.

Here we have science hard at work solving problems - not by determining the truth - but by hammering the square problem into their predetermined round hole. As with those who have perpetuated the covid hoax on us, they’re not practicing science, they’re charlatans masquerading as scientists, playing whack-a-mole to sustain their agenda. The only reason they get away with it is because Fauci and his big pharma partners have lot of money to throw around to coerce the media and the public into believing their phony agendas.

the human virome

I’ve mentioned Dr. Zack Bush a number of times over the past year or so. Thanks to a suggestion from a reader, I recently watched his 2 hour long video about the human virome. Some of what follows is based on that video. Some of you may have heard this information but may not have understood the implications. This is what Dr. Bush does so very well… makes clear the implications.

We’ve all heard the human genome is complex, but in fact we only have 20,000 base pair. A flea has 30,000. And only 1% of our DNA codes for human genes - the other 99% has often wrongly been referred to as junk DNA (RNA). However, the bigger picture is much more complicated than that. We all contain 40,000 to 60,000 species of bacteria which, when combined, have a total of 2 million genes, a logarithmic jump in genomic possibilities. Each of those genes is capable of making between 20 and 200 different proteins. Multiply 2 million times 200 and it quickly becomes apparent that the vast majority of proteins made in our bodies - the building blocks of our life - are made by bacteria.

That’s not the end of it. We also have about 300,000 species of parasites which account for another 2 billion genes. Then there are the 3.5 million species of fungi that live in and on us, which add up to another astounding 125 trillion genes. All of these life forms and their dazzling array of genes makes us unfathomably complex. In sum, what we are talking about here is the human microbiome. Add to that the fact that each and every one of us has a unique microbiome and it becomes apparent that we are all, infinitely complex.

In other words, our human genome plays but a small role in determining who we are, how we feel and how we function. Put another way, in spite of what we’ve been told by those who profit from our diseases, the human cell and its DNA/RNA do not lie at the center of our existence. Nor do they lie at the center of the causative nature of disease. We are so complex that anyone who thinks they can determine how to cure a disease that arises in this exceedingly complex milieu of life by administering a toxic injection, to merely affect cell function, is full of… well, let’s just say, they’re full of hubris. The lack of positive results from the covid jabs certainly exemplifies this.

Of course this means that all of the research into mRNA vaccines and all of the billions of US taxpayer dollars that Fauci has spent on DNA, RNA and gain of function research can be compared to the proverbial hound dog barking up the wrong tree. Put simply, that dog don’t hunt.

Unfortunately, we’ve been left with a horrendous legacy - that dog is now responsible for the deaths and permanent injuries of millions of people.

As I pointed out in an early 2021, 25% of covid deaths in the world have occurred in the US (still valid), which represents only 4% of the worlds population. This is happening within the most expensive health care system on earth, which costs the US 4 trillion annually. The military budget is 680 billion. Why has chronic illness in the US gone from 6% of the population in 1960 to 54% today? Why have autism rates among boys in the US gone from 1 in 20,000 in 1940 to 1 in 22 today? Could it have something to do with that dog barking up the wrong tree? Could it have anything to do with the phony theory that viruses are the cause of disease? As the following charts clearly show, most increases in disease have occurred in the 50 years since Anthony Fauci took a position with the NIH. Prior to that we came much closer to being in the state of health that Dr. Bush described above.

onward

I recently watched another webinar with Dr. Tom Cowan (it’s behind a paywall) explaining why the virus theory is full of holes. He gave a great analogy for the way the structure of the covid virus was determined. He said it would be like taking a puzzle with 56 million pieces and dumping them on the floor and telling someone to assemble the puzzle without knowing what the image is supposed to look like… because there is no reference. This is what the computers did for those hubristic “scientists” that claim to have isolated the covid virus. This explains how that, without a reference picture, when a million other researchers tried to isolate the virus, they got a million different variations of the virus.

According to the NIH: “Genomic characterization has shown that SARS‐CoV‐2 share almost 80% of the genome with SARS‐CoV but it contains additional gene regions (10b, 13, 14)” Keep in mind that what we are told we are dealing with right now is not SARS-CoV-2 but COVID-19, an iteration that has supposedly arrived many years after SARS CoV-2. This, of course, means its genetic similarity is even further removed from the antiquated SARS-CoV reference. Dr. Cowan estimates the similarities to be around 50 to 60%. Also according to the NIH, chimps share 96% of the human genome. If a 4% difference in genetic sequencing results in species as widely separated as chimps and humans, how can they justify saying that a 50% difference SARS CoV and COVID-19 is negligible? Or even 20%? We are left to conclude that the foundation upon which their science is built is made of sand. Apart from the NIH’s negligent willingness to embrace hypocrisy, it’s abundantly clear that their attempts to justify the existence and causative nature of the covid virus has them walking on very thin ice.

Once upon a time science held up Kocks postulates as the gold standard for determining causative relationship between a microbe and disease. Here are the postulates.

The bacteria must be present in every case of the disease.

The bacteria must be isolated from the host with the disease and grown in pure culture.

The specific disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the bacteria is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host.

The bacteria must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host.

Seems straightforward, right? The problem is, those pushing the virus agenda could never make the postulates work. Why? Because viruses do not spread symptomatic illness - they’re not causative. In his book The Contagion Myth, Dr. Tom Cowan points out that in spite of numerous studies where snot was taken from sick people and placed into the nasal cavity of healthy people, in every case they failed to get sick.

Today that straight forward, no nonsense gold standard has been replaced by an “intellectually phase locked” dictum to take a mucous sample and grow it in a medium of fetal bovine calf serum. Just for the record, these calves are taken from the womb of slaughtered mothers.

First of all, as any whole systems biologist will tell you, you cannot remove something that can only live in its native habitat and then place it in a laboratory setting and expect it to behave in the same way it does in its native habitat. It’s akin to biologists who remove a tree from the forest and study it in a lab to learn how a forest functions. Can’t be done.

In this instance, not only are the researchers removing the human microbe from its native habitat, they’re then placing it in a completely foreign habitat, fetal bovine serum. Additionally, the culture medium is in a sterile lab, under artificial lights, bombarded by emf’s, toxins and all sorts of other insults. Then the specimen is subjected to a series of treatments to make it more visible under electron microscopes that further reduce its original form to the point of no longer having any resemblance to what it was when it was taken out of its host. And we are to believe that this is ‘the scientific method’ that proves that viruses exist and are causative.

The point of this is… how do the researchers keep the fetal bovine serum (FBS) from contaminating their human cell cultures? Short answer… they don’t. Here is the conclusion from one research paper on this topic published in nature.com (I’m sorry, I couldn’t find the original paper).

“Furthermore, FBS transcripts can be taken up by cultured cells and affect the results of highly sensitive gene expression profiling technologies, Therefore, precaution for experimental design are warranted to minimize the interference and misinterpretations caused by FBS derived RNA.”

Please note that the study does not say that mistakes can be completely avoided, only that they can be “minimized”. So we’ve gone from what Wikipedia calls the “obsolete criteria” (sounds like big pharma influenced phrasing) of Koch’s postulates to the “science” of intellectual phase locking to make a square problem fit a predetermined round hole. Isn’t modern science wonderful?

All bow to lord Fauci and his holy book of science.

Truck Turdeau.