does tni have blood on its hands?
the great conspiracy to block and censor our freedom to access the truth
Welcome back to the sietch all of you secular apostates! I love all of you so much for your passionate pursuit of truth and freedom!
If you’re new here, The Secular Heretic is where freedom reigns supreme! Whether that be freedom of medical choice, freedom of religion, freedom of body autonomy, freedom to live in a decentralized world, freedom to grow and eat what you think is best for you, or the freedom to run your own affairs. It also includes the freedom to know what your government is doing, which requires the freedom to read, listen to and watch unfiltered, unbiased, uncensored, decentralized, independent news.
Theoretically, all of these freedoms are guaranteed under the US Constitution. But as I’ve been pointing out here over the past several years, those freedoms have slowly been eroded by centralized money and power, both of which are managed by the deep state on behalf of their globalist puppeteers.
This post is mostly about another important lawsuit recently filed against some of the globalists responsible for the imposition of covidcon and the ensuing transhumanism and eugenics programs. There have been so many similar lawsuits filed over the past year or so that it’s getting difficult to track all of them. I saw a report this morning pointing out that over 1,000 lawsuits have been filed over the previous year against pharmaceutical companies alone.
The good news is, there are signs that all those lawsuits are beginning to have an effect. One of the most noticeable effects can be seen by the lack of attendance of notable leaders and the dismal speeches at this years WEF meeting in Davos.
Another sign are the increasing number of WEF cultists that are stepping down from their vaulted positions around them world. The Prime Minister of Sweden Stefan Löfven, stepped down. Here is his WEF profile. Angela Merkel Prime Minister of Germany, stepped down. Here is her WEF profile. YGL graduate Jeff Bezos, founder and former CEO of Amazon, has stepped down. His WEF profile has apparently been scrubbed.
But perhaps one of the most celebrated graduates of Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders program has been Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, who recently announced her resignation.
Why are we not surprised? Many would say that Ardern has been ardent about carrying out the tenets of the WEF cult. She is responsible for some of the strictest lockdowns, mask measures and vaccine mandates imposed anywhere in the world - all in what was previously celebrated as one of the most democratic nations in the world. Because she now has the blood of thousands of New Zealanders on her hands, and according to this UN chart, many thousands more to come, maybe she has awakened to the fact that she may very well have a huge target on her back.
New Zealand Death Rate 1950-2023
Note that this chart claims to not include covid deaths. Uhm, that’s because there were no excess covid deaths. But as the chart makes clear, the death count has gone up since the introduction of the jabs and, due to the strict jab mandates Ardern imposed, is set to go much, much higher.
Also note that as the higher death rate becomes ingrained within the dataset, the percentage of annual change begins to drop. This is a statistical trick that by 2060 will be used to say, “look, the percentage of annual deaths has leveled off”. The reality will be that the overall death rate is much higher than it was 60 years earlier.
Ardern claims that she has not been able to determine how to pull off two more years. Right. Then she breaks down and says she will retire. There can be several reasons why any person cries; grief, anger, fear. Her explanation seems to indicate fear. Of all the 5Eye nations, she has, after all, been the most effective at leading New Zealand down the road to perdition. It would seem she has many thousands of reasons to be afraid.
The look on Arderns face when she broke down reminds me of the look I saw on the face of another woman who also had a gun pointed at her, myself and another guy. Actually it was four automatic M16’s pointed at us by Federales in a remote canyon of Mexico while we had our backs up against a cliff - but that’s a whole ‘nuther story. Take it from me, fear can motivate a person to do unusual things. If you want me to tell that story, let me know and I’ll post it in the comments.
All of this is to say that it seems that something seems to be afoot. Why are so many people on the inside now pulling out? Why is the current meeting at Davos turning out to be a bust? Why are billionaires heading for their bunkers in the mountains?
onward
During the debate that preceded the vote on the Radio Act of 1928 Luther Johnson, Democrat from Texas, had this to say about the dangerous power that centralized broadcasting networks could impose.
American thought and American politics will be largely at the mercy of those who operate these stations, for publicity is the most powerful weapon that can be wielded in a republic. And when such a weapon is placed in the hands of one person, or a single selfish group is permitted to either tacitly or otherwise acquire ownership or dominate these broadcasting stations throughout the country, then woe be to those who dare to differ with them. It will be impossible to compete with them in reaching the ears of the American people.
Few people have uttered more prophetic words.
At the core of the Radio Act was a mandate that broadcasters had to serve the public interest.
The Radio Act was followed by the Fairness Doctrine which was enacted into law in 1959. Britannica has this to say about the Fairness Doctrine.
… U.S. communications policy (1949–87) formulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that required licensed radio and television broadcasters to present fair and balanced coverage of controversial issues of interest to their communities, including by granting equal airtime to opposing candidates for public office.
Due to debatable questions regarding free speech, in 1987 Ronald Reagan repealed the Fairness Doctrine. Here is Britannica again.
In 1987 the FCC formally repealed the fairness doctrine but maintained both the editorial and personal-attack provisions, which remained in effect until 2000. In addition, until they were finally repealed by the commission in 2011, more than 80 media rules maintained language that implemented the doctrine.
In case you’re wondering, Obama was president in 2011.
All of this led to the demise of free and open debate, not only among ALL political candidates, but everyone else. It set the mold for the highly divided partisanship that now rules our lives.
Divide and conquer.
Generally speaking, I’m against government regulation, especially as it pertains to health and freedom matters. But I’m also against centralized power, control and corruption. If I or any other common person had the ability to hire the same lawyers that corporate media giants can hire, then yes, I would say, let’s completely deregulate everything and let’s have at them in court. Things would change real fast. But right now the playing field is extremely tilted in favor of big corporations that can lobby congress to enact favorable laws and can hire the best law firms. True justice in the ‘justice system’ is not coming any time soon - the current arrangement of the judicial system is too beneficial to the status quo. So, the only other way to level the playing field is to regulate industries exhibiting monopolistic behavior.
Today we’re going to look into how deregulation has led to the creation of our current fascist, corporate media that now colludes with the government to censor writers like myself and usurp our freedom to access to truthful news.
No, this is not about the Twitter Files. Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss and the other reporters covering that story are doing a fine job of exposing how deep state government agencies colluded with Twitter to censure the free speech of countless Americans. Besides, I’m not a fan of YGL graduate Elon Musk. Although he has recently said some damning things about the WEF, questions remain.
Instead, we’re going to zero in on the Orwellian named “Trusted News Initiative” (TNI), which I detailed on July 3, 2021, shortly after it began flexing its muscle.
TNI is back in the news today because Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense (CHD - chaired by Kennedy), along with other plaintiffs, have filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit against TNI. The plaintiffs are alleging damages due to collusion among members of TNI. According to CHD "Federal antitrust law prohibits firms from colluding to deny critical facilities or market access to rivals.” For reasons having to do with making the case more attractive to the courts, the legal team has decided to peruse this as an antitrust case.
The rest of the plaintiffs are; Trailsite Inc., Creative Destruction Media, LLC, Erin Elizabeth Finn, Jim Hoft, Dr. Ben Tapper, Ben Swan, Dr Joseph Mercola, Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
The defendants are all members of TNI; the BBC, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, Reuters.
On its website, TNI says this about its members.
Who is involved?
Core partners in the TNI are: AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompass – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express – India, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan.
As you can see, this list includes just about every entity that has been playing a role in promoting covidcon and the censorship of free speech.
Long time readers will know that I’ve done several rounds with Reuters and their “fact checking” service, which I debunked several times.
As it pertains to being able to talk openly about the covid plandemic, I became particularly concerned in April of 2021 when I realized I was being censored on all Google platforms. Of course, once you’re flagged by one of these organizations, you’re put on everyone’s list. So in April of 2021 I posted this piece, in which I acknowledged the work that Robert Kennedy Jr. and CHD were doing exposing the fraud of vaccines.
On its surface this CHD lawsuit may seem like another one of many lawsuits now being filed around the world against the numerous perpetrators of death and destruction - what I call globalist 5th generation warfare against the human race - via covidcon. If you think this case is insignificant, you would be wrong, but I don’t blame you. So far, little has been said about the profound ramifications that this case against TNI holds. RFK Jr. alluded to some of those ramifications in this interview, but he and the other plaintiffs may be restricted from talking about some of the deeper issues for legal reasons.
Truth be told, other than having a Skype conversation and exchanging a few comments in a forum with one of the plaintiffs around 2017 and sharing a few comments in a forum with another plaintiff around the same time, I don’t know any of the plaintiffs and have no personal insight into any of the tactics they’re seeking to use. But, because I’ve been researching TNI since early 2021, I believe I’ve uncovered some information that may play an important role in the case. The Secular Heretic has at least one subscriber from CHD, one from Mercola and possibly some from some of the other plaintiffs, so if I’m treading where I should not, I’m sure I’ll hear about it.
here we go
As I pointed out in that July 3, 2021 piece, the legacy news media is not what it appears to be. None of the defendants listed in the TNI lawsuit are who they appear to be. Here’s how I explained it in that earlier piece.
The truth is that all corporate media is owned by bigger entities that are owned by even bigger entities. (In fact, this is true for many regional, national and International businesses - which is why the local movement is so important.) When we get just one level from the top of the pyramid we find just two asset management firms own major shares of every important industry and business on earth - The Vanguard Group and BlackRock Inc. - both of which are US based firms. Because of its world wide influence, these two firms are especially cozy with the media industry and because of their highly profitable positions, with the medical and drug cartels.
Here’s how it works: On the one hand, they’re in a good position to profit from vaccines thanks to their top to bottom holdings in all aspects of the pharmaceutical/vaccine industries. On the other hand they’re able to impose the official pandemic narrative through the media they control; to lockdown, wear masks, socially distance, give up our jobs and so forth. Of course, one of the end games of all of this to instill a deep but completely unfounded fear of covid, to motivate people to line up for the highly profitable vaccines. I would be negligent if I failed to mention that some of these investors are also on board with the eugenics aspect of the program.
But hold on, we’re not to the top of the pyramid yet. At the top sits the shareholders whose assets these firms manage. So who is the largest shareholder of BlackRock? Wait for it… Vanguard! Here is where we get lost in the cesspool of international intrigue of how the worlds richest families operate beneath the radar of prying eyes. You see, Vanguard is a private company, so they don’t have to divulge who their shareholders are.
However… a woman in the Netherlands who goes by the name Covid Lies has done some fine research into all of this. Her work shows that those who sit on top of the pyramid includes; the Rothchild Investment Corporation, Edmond de Rothchild Holding, the Morgans, the Bush family (oil money), the Italian Orsini family, the British royal family, Vanderbilt’s, Rockefeller’s and the DuPont family. No surprises there.
I then go on to explain how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funds the highly biased international news outlet known as Project Syndicate (similar to Reuters and AP) and how the Open Society Foundation, founded by George Soros, and the European Journalism Center funnel money to various other organizations to publish what they deem as news and ignore news that they deem detrimental to their profits and those of their overlord shareholders.
I also explain how Reuters provides a classic example of who actually owns the legacy media.
Reuters provides a fine example of how a major news dissemination company controls the official narrative. Reuters used to be owned by the Rothchild family, who sold it to the Thomson family, the richest family in Canada. Thomson Reuters (a member of TNI) then sold off 55% of its interest in Financial and Risk to who else…? Blackstone. Jim Smith is the chairman of the board for Thomson Rueters. Jim Smith also happens to sit on the board of Pfizer. How convenient. As George Carlin said when talking about who runs the world, “It’s a small club and you ain't in it!”
Just for the record, some of Pfizer’s other board members include the former CEO of Coca-Cola, a former Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs and CEO of Adobe. If you’re running a major world wide scam, that eclectic group just about covers all the bases.
I should add that there is purposeful confusion between BlackRock and Blackstone. BlackRock is the worlds largest asset manager while Blackstone is the worlds largest private equity firm. Blackstone was founded in 1985 by two mucky mucks from Lehman Brothers, Peter Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman. BlackRock was founded in 1988 by Larry Fink and some more shysters from Lehman Brothers and First Boston. At the time of its founding it was called Blackstone Financial Management (BFM) because, in exchange for a 50% stake in the company, it got a $5 million line of credit from Blackstone to get up and running.
In 1992 BFM became BlackRock and in 1994 Swharzman and Fink had a major disagreement. Schwarzman sold his share to BlackRock. In discussions they agreed that having similar names would be confusingly beneficial.
It is indeed, a small club.
By now you astute heretics will have determined why this lawsuit holds a lot of potential. By suing the named defendants, the plaintiffs will be playing the role of Toto in the movie the Wizard of Oz, who, in the defining moment of the movie, pulls down the curtain hiding the great Oz. Who will be exposed when this lawsuit pulls down the curtain? As this suit pertains to Reuters, we can expect that Blackstone will be exposed, possibly Pfizer as well. Among many other things, that tiny segment of the world that hasn’t been reading the Secular Heretic will learn that the chairman of Reuters, the leading news information service in the world, also sits on the board of Pfizer.
Coming up - we’ll consider some of globalists who will likely have their pants pulled down by this lawsuit.
A few minutes after posting this piece, I got this in an email from CHD, asking the public for help in supporting the lawsuit. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/support-chd-lawsuits/?source=e1&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2ceb3683-33f0-4cc9-bd5f-fafb12f5e3d8
I had the same reaction when I saw Ardern's face. My thought was that she wasn't going to play along anymore and she was being threatened. Her replacement has advocated chasing down the vaccine hesitant. Hoping the best for CHD but in my aged and cynical mind, they didn't plan all this out without having a backup plan for the hesitant and the rebellious.