Good day Kyle. You may have noticed that I mentioned Tulsi Gabbard as RFK Jr. VP. Which strongly suggest to me at least that RFK Jr is running as his own person (third party ???). Still I feel that lead poisoning is what is waiting for him. He has folks around him that are snitches.
Long before he would ever be able >"denounced the existence of viruses." Some type of accident will happen. So I will hope he stays in the trenches as he has all these years. A live Bobby is far more powerful than a dead one.
He's been talking about running as a Democrat. If he runs, I too prefer he not have anything to do with the uniparty.
Members of his own family have shown some hostilities regarding his medical positions. He definitely falls far outside establishment positions to make it as a Democrat.
I could tolerate Tulsi Gabbard as a running mate, but she has weak positions regarding the medical industrial complex.
I am lukewarm about her. I followed her closely last campaign and was stunned that Biden chose Kamala for a running mate after Tulsi demolished her.
Also a strong Jewish correspondent don't remember her name was going after Tulsi about her position on the Jewish state and other things important to Jews. Tulsi look right at her and told here she was Hindu, and if she wanted to go down that road that was fine with Tulsi. The subject changed right there.
I know Modi and Netanyahu seem close. I don't think what Tulsi was willing to do was going to make the Israeli position look good. She is no lover of banks and that most likely kept her from going any further, like Kamala did. Still can't believe she is VP. No wonder Joe is still President.
Being from AZ, I like Kari Lake, although I have some problems with her border policies. On medical issues and decentralization, not that much distance between them. That would be a formidable ticket.
Perhaps so. I don't know much about her. Mostly I am interested in caring for the Earth/Gaia. And dumping these fraud carbon credits and fake corporate environmentalism.
Can you provide a links so I can learn more about her. Thank you.
Apr 20, 2023·edited Apr 21, 2023Liked by Kyle Young
I agree Lynn. Now that he is running my wife and I are supporting him in any way we can. We need him that is for sure. What worries me is no one see''s Mike "lie cheat and steal" Pompeo in the wings of the Republican party. He is CIA. Near the end of the Presidential campaign Trump will step aside and Pompeo will step in. Sadly by coming in late the public will not have a chance to vet Pompeo.
Whether he would win or not is not important. He will raise issues no one else will and that’s why he should run. My guess is he realizes this and kudos to him for his strong belief in democratic ideals and his willingness to espouse them.
Similar to what Ron Paul did in 2008 & 2012. Dr Paul has often said in so many words he was running more to expose Americans to the ideas of personal liberty and the corrupt Fed Banking system than to actually win. I can only imagine what RFK jr could do to present some truths about health, pharma and environmental issues.
Wish they were more Conservative views. It's the Democrat Communist Party now. You actually think that the so called Democrats are going to work with Bobby. If Bobby's beliefs are in current democrat ideals, I don't want him near the White House.
No, I don't think the dems are going to work with him and I doubt he thinks so either - because his ideals are so far removed from the status quo dems.
Here's what I think. He'll use massive coverage the Democrat contenders will get to pull in a lot of voters under his umbrella, especially during debates. Then if the dems threaten to not give him the nomination he'll tell them he and his voters are going to leave and form a new party. If they let him, will that be the end of the democratic party?
People are superficial. I remember my grandma told me she voted for Clinton because he was cuter than Bush. Not much of a choice between those two, but really grandma? RFK's spasmodic dysphonia alone would stop him from getting elected.
I have been praying for a viable third party to form that runs simply on cleaning up the Cabal currently running both parties and wish that all honest people disillusioned with the right and the left, Republicans and Democrats, would jump ship, create a third party based in reason and integrity, and willing to take on openly the demons fighting to destroy Human Freedom here and abroad.
Kennedy would be my choice to create this group, and I used to hope he and DeSantis would form a hybrid Presidential ticket to get it off and running with a bang.
But alas, DeSantis is exposed as a closet puppet, and Kennedy is still a Democrat, so no go, so far.
Maybe others will do what the ones on center stage cannot.
As I mentioned to wm, if Kennedy were to run, I prefer he avoid the corrupt uniparty. I don't see him getting the nomination if he does. Unless, as I speculated, he's seeking to take them to court after they kill his nomination. But I'm thinking that would be a wasted effort.
I can't think of anyone else in a better position to start a third party then Kennedy. But we can safely assume that it will only be effective until it gets taken over by the powers that be. Hopefully it would be able to make some positive changes before it does.
Almost impossible to believe that 24% chose none of the above. Is it that RFK believes in protecting children, is that his heinous crime? Please I would love to know.
I have to agree with tjfratello. Many are not disillusioned with Kennedy, but they are sufficiently disillusioned with the uniparty system to not vote for either party.
I want him to stay alive. His life is precious and because he is able to inform those who want to learn. Lead poisoning or some other toxin or accident will lead to his untimely end. Most importantly there are no hero's. We must become the hero we seek.
We need citizens with the same energy and wisdom as RFKjr to back him up. I don't see that. If we had such citizenry we wouldn't have the last 24 years of duffus presidents and useless legislators.
Yes I imagine it would, if NONE OF THE ABOVE did not win outright, but it went to the electoral college. There is always many unseen complications that is for sure. Still I believe we would see stronger slate of candidates as people are so tried of the trash we have been asked to vote for.
So maybe RFK should on the Republican ticket? Seriously, folks, here's what I believe to be important and true:
VIRUSES :
1. Viruses are not ‘out there.’ They’re in us. They’re an essential component of our immune system.
2. There is no measles virus, no polio virus, no HIV virus, no small pox virus, no cancer virus, etc.
3. Virologists have had the electron microscope for decades. It is capable of finding viruses.
4. Virologists have never found the virus that has been accused of causing any given disease.
5. If the accused virus was present, it would be found.
6. Using the electron microscope, virologists have found exosomes, which are identical to viruses.
7. It’s likely that viruses are exosomes.*
8. No virus has ever been proven to cause the disease of which it’s been accused.
9. Virologists, after eliminating bacteria or parasites and such, ASSUME that the unseen and unfound virus MUST be the cause of the given disease.
10. Virologists have failed to look for other possible or likely environmental cause(s) of any given disease.
11. The purpose of the Scientific Method is to test theories. The theory that viruses cause disease has not been tested.
12. Untested, unproven theories accepted on faith or consensus based on faith is not SCIENCE.
13. Virologist’s belief that viruses cause disease is RELIGIOUS DOGMA.
14. In lieu of no real and verifiable proof of the accused virus causing any given disease, virologists offer as proof a computer constructed model of the accused virus.
15. The computer model is based on a fragment of the accused virus. The fragment could be cellular debris. It could be a fragment of a dead virus being eliminated from the body. It could be anything.
16. Hundreds of computer models are constructed, each a little different. These different models represent the supposed virus mutations.
17. In the absence of a real virus to study, computer modeling has become the Scientific Method.
18. Based on what the computer model creates, a vaccine is manufactured to kill the supposed virus.
19. The purpose of the vaccine is to create a product to sell to the public.
20. Vaccines are hugely profitable for the vaccine makers and for those who, like Gates and Fauci, own vaccine patents or stock in the company making the vaccine.
21. The GERM THEORY is the foundation for this fraud, this travesty, this corruption of science and medicine.
22. To end the medical tyranny based on the fear of viruses, the GERM THEORY must be exposed as the fraud it is and abolished.
* It occurs to me that calling viruses exosomes has made it possible for virologists to study viruses without being called a heretic and driven out of the virology herd.
Interesting. Please provide links to documentation that this is so. I would also greatly appreciate links to any documentation you have on "viruses, vesicles, exosomes, virions and noninfectious viruses". Because that trail seems cold to me. The subject is hidden in immunology. Not many papers out there that go into detail.
Another good source of investigative reporting on the many virus/vaccine frauds is Jon Rappoport at nomorefakenews.com. See his archive of Covid articles. His reporting goes all the back to the mid-late 80s and the HIV/AIDS fraud.
What amazes me is these various virus frauds have been trying to get off the launching pad for 40 years and failed each time until Covid. It appears to me that the reason Covid succeeded is that while the FDA stopped the previous fraud rollouts due to the significant number of deaths and disabilities in the human trials, in 2020 it gave the Covid trials, with all its deaths and injuries, a pass. After 40 years of trying, the FDA had become so infiltrated with pharma cheerleaders and corruption that success was finally achieved.
There is also the PCR test and the death of its inventor and the completion of the EUA/immunity infrastructure and the transfer of responsibility to the DoD, who officially has nor responsibility.
That's my problem. The dems platform is way too left for me. Re DeSantis, I need to hear much more about this economic and foreign policy. So selected none of your candidates.
Good question - 116. And it ran for three days. I forgot to change the parameters to make this one run for the same time. Default is 24 hours. But the percentages of the first poll didn't change much from the first 6 hours.
This one has 143 votes. It looks like most of the additional votes went to none of the above.
I cannot vote because my choice, whatever it is, is not on the list. Is there a Democratic candidate with a real chance of winning, discounting RFK Jr? Don't get me wrong, I like Kennedy. And he is clearly not a Republican (I am a registered Democrat). Were he to be elected, I would likely not be the only person holding my breath in anticipation of assassination. Could the nation survive such a horror?
Yeah I hear you That makes sense. We have a one party state of Demicans and Republicrats and anybody who really wants to be taken seriously needs to distance themselves from the de facto uniparty corporatocracy.
Good day Kyle. You may have noticed that I mentioned Tulsi Gabbard as RFK Jr. VP. Which strongly suggest to me at least that RFK Jr is running as his own person (third party ???). Still I feel that lead poisoning is what is waiting for him. He has folks around him that are snitches.
Long before he would ever be able >"denounced the existence of viruses." Some type of accident will happen. So I will hope he stays in the trenches as he has all these years. A live Bobby is far more powerful than a dead one.
He's been talking about running as a Democrat. If he runs, I too prefer he not have anything to do with the uniparty.
Members of his own family have shown some hostilities regarding his medical positions. He definitely falls far outside establishment positions to make it as a Democrat.
I could tolerate Tulsi Gabbard as a running mate, but she has weak positions regarding the medical industrial complex.
I am lukewarm about her. I followed her closely last campaign and was stunned that Biden chose Kamala for a running mate after Tulsi demolished her.
Also a strong Jewish correspondent don't remember her name was going after Tulsi about her position on the Jewish state and other things important to Jews. Tulsi look right at her and told here she was Hindu, and if she wanted to go down that road that was fine with Tulsi. The subject changed right there.
I know Modi and Netanyahu seem close. I don't think what Tulsi was willing to do was going to make the Israeli position look good. She is no lover of banks and that most likely kept her from going any further, like Kamala did. Still can't believe she is VP. No wonder Joe is still President.
Being from AZ, I like Kari Lake, although I have some problems with her border policies. On medical issues and decentralization, not that much distance between them. That would be a formidable ticket.
Perhaps so. I don't know much about her. Mostly I am interested in caring for the Earth/Gaia. And dumping these fraud carbon credits and fake corporate environmentalism.
Can you provide a links so I can learn more about her. Thank you.
Nothing recent. Right now shes fighting her highly questionable loss to Katie Hobbs who was sec of state overseeing elections.
Here is her old platform - https://www.karilake.com/issues
But, I think there is more in the making with Bobby running.
I agree Lynn. Now that he is running my wife and I are supporting him in any way we can. We need him that is for sure. What worries me is no one see''s Mike "lie cheat and steal" Pompeo in the wings of the Republican party. He is CIA. Near the end of the Presidential campaign Trump will step aside and Pompeo will step in. Sadly by coming in late the public will not have a chance to vet Pompeo.
I hope I am wrong.
Whether he would win or not is not important. He will raise issues no one else will and that’s why he should run. My guess is he realizes this and kudos to him for his strong belief in democratic ideals and his willingness to espouse them.
Similar to what Ron Paul did in 2008 & 2012. Dr Paul has often said in so many words he was running more to expose Americans to the ideas of personal liberty and the corrupt Fed Banking system than to actually win. I can only imagine what RFK jr could do to present some truths about health, pharma and environmental issues.
Hopefully we'll find out.
That may very well his sole intention.
Wish they were more Conservative views. It's the Democrat Communist Party now. You actually think that the so called Democrats are going to work with Bobby. If Bobby's beliefs are in current democrat ideals, I don't want him near the White House.
No, I don't think the dems are going to work with him and I doubt he thinks so either - because his ideals are so far removed from the status quo dems.
There could be another alternative in the making?
Here's what I think. He'll use massive coverage the Democrat contenders will get to pull in a lot of voters under his umbrella, especially during debates. Then if the dems threaten to not give him the nomination he'll tell them he and his voters are going to leave and form a new party. If they let him, will that be the end of the democratic party?
I don't know about that. But, I am thinking of another possibility.
People are superficial. I remember my grandma told me she voted for Clinton because he was cuter than Bush. Not much of a choice between those two, but really grandma? RFK's spasmodic dysphonia alone would stop him from getting elected.
I'm not so sure about that.
But I do agree with grulla.
Well, I hope not, but don't be surprised.
IMHO, after listening to Biden's mumblings, RFK's dysponia problem should be moot.
Haha, yeah I didn't say it would stop me from voting for him.
Hi grulla.
Good point!
Did you forget that Biden and Fetterman got elected (supposedly)?
Anything is possible when you cheat.
I have been praying for a viable third party to form that runs simply on cleaning up the Cabal currently running both parties and wish that all honest people disillusioned with the right and the left, Republicans and Democrats, would jump ship, create a third party based in reason and integrity, and willing to take on openly the demons fighting to destroy Human Freedom here and abroad.
Kennedy would be my choice to create this group, and I used to hope he and DeSantis would form a hybrid Presidential ticket to get it off and running with a bang.
But alas, DeSantis is exposed as a closet puppet, and Kennedy is still a Democrat, so no go, so far.
Maybe others will do what the ones on center stage cannot.
Ask that from your readers, perhaps?
Time for a Third Party?
If so, who would you like to see in it???
As I mentioned to wm, if Kennedy were to run, I prefer he avoid the corrupt uniparty. I don't see him getting the nomination if he does. Unless, as I speculated, he's seeking to take them to court after they kill his nomination. But I'm thinking that would be a wasted effort.
I can't think of anyone else in a better position to start a third party then Kennedy. But we can safely assume that it will only be effective until it gets taken over by the powers that be. Hopefully it would be able to make some positive changes before it does.
Almost impossible to believe that 24% chose none of the above. Is it that RFK believes in protecting children, is that his heinous crime? Please I would love to know.
I have to agree with tjfratello. Many are not disillusioned with Kennedy, but they are sufficiently disillusioned with the uniparty system to not vote for either party.
I want him to stay alive. His life is precious and because he is able to inform those who want to learn. Lead poisoning or some other toxin or accident will lead to his untimely end. Most importantly there are no hero's. We must become the hero we seek.
We need citizens with the same energy and wisdom as RFKjr to back him up. I don't see that. If we had such citizenry we wouldn't have the last 24 years of duffus presidents and useless legislators.
Sad but true.
We need an important addendum to voting selection.
NONE OF THE ABOVE which clears the slate. I am beating a dead horse. Still we need that option.
That could make for some interesting split votes.
Yes I imagine it would, if NONE OF THE ABOVE did not win outright, but it went to the electoral college. There is always many unseen complications that is for sure. Still I believe we would see stronger slate of candidates as people are so tried of the trash we have been asked to vote for.
Good point. I have no answers.
some comments ive seen elsewhere are they will not consider him if he is running as a Democrat
So maybe RFK should on the Republican ticket? Seriously, folks, here's what I believe to be important and true:
VIRUSES :
1. Viruses are not ‘out there.’ They’re in us. They’re an essential component of our immune system.
2. There is no measles virus, no polio virus, no HIV virus, no small pox virus, no cancer virus, etc.
3. Virologists have had the electron microscope for decades. It is capable of finding viruses.
4. Virologists have never found the virus that has been accused of causing any given disease.
5. If the accused virus was present, it would be found.
6. Using the electron microscope, virologists have found exosomes, which are identical to viruses.
7. It’s likely that viruses are exosomes.*
8. No virus has ever been proven to cause the disease of which it’s been accused.
9. Virologists, after eliminating bacteria or parasites and such, ASSUME that the unseen and unfound virus MUST be the cause of the given disease.
10. Virologists have failed to look for other possible or likely environmental cause(s) of any given disease.
11. The purpose of the Scientific Method is to test theories. The theory that viruses cause disease has not been tested.
12. Untested, unproven theories accepted on faith or consensus based on faith is not SCIENCE.
13. Virologist’s belief that viruses cause disease is RELIGIOUS DOGMA.
14. In lieu of no real and verifiable proof of the accused virus causing any given disease, virologists offer as proof a computer constructed model of the accused virus.
15. The computer model is based on a fragment of the accused virus. The fragment could be cellular debris. It could be a fragment of a dead virus being eliminated from the body. It could be anything.
16. Hundreds of computer models are constructed, each a little different. These different models represent the supposed virus mutations.
17. In the absence of a real virus to study, computer modeling has become the Scientific Method.
18. Based on what the computer model creates, a vaccine is manufactured to kill the supposed virus.
19. The purpose of the vaccine is to create a product to sell to the public.
20. Vaccines are hugely profitable for the vaccine makers and for those who, like Gates and Fauci, own vaccine patents or stock in the company making the vaccine.
21. The GERM THEORY is the foundation for this fraud, this travesty, this corruption of science and medicine.
22. To end the medical tyranny based on the fear of viruses, the GERM THEORY must be exposed as the fraud it is and abolished.
* It occurs to me that calling viruses exosomes has made it possible for virologists to study viruses without being called a heretic and driven out of the virology herd.
All good points... except, as I've pointed our in numerous posts, vaccines may be meant to kill something besides viruses.
And it can be millions of models, not hundreds.
Well it kills the human immune system so I assume that's what it's for.
You're right. Thanks. Any corrections or additions are welcome from anyone.
Exosomes are merely cellular evidence of your body's healing response.
Interesting. Please provide links to documentation that this is so. I would also greatly appreciate links to any documentation you have on "viruses, vesicles, exosomes, virions and noninfectious viruses". Because that trail seems cold to me. The subject is hidden in immunology. Not many papers out there that go into detail.
Another good source of investigative reporting on the many virus/vaccine frauds is Jon Rappoport at nomorefakenews.com. See his archive of Covid articles. His reporting goes all the back to the mid-late 80s and the HIV/AIDS fraud.
What amazes me is these various virus frauds have been trying to get off the launching pad for 40 years and failed each time until Covid. It appears to me that the reason Covid succeeded is that while the FDA stopped the previous fraud rollouts due to the significant number of deaths and disabilities in the human trials, in 2020 it gave the Covid trials, with all its deaths and injuries, a pass. After 40 years of trying, the FDA had become so infiltrated with pharma cheerleaders and corruption that success was finally achieved.
There is also the PCR test and the death of its inventor and the completion of the EUA/immunity infrastructure and the transfer of responsibility to the DoD, who officially has nor responsibility.
Taking out the garbage.
That's my problem. The dems platform is way too left for me. Re DeSantis, I need to hear much more about this economic and foreign policy. So selected none of your candidates.
Agree about the dems. But DeSantis is a made man - not with the mafia, but with something much worse. See the previous post.
Replied above in the thread. Sorry I am consistently pressing the wrong reply button 😅
And they have a lot of good reasons for that.
Hey Kyle, how many people actually voted in the last poll? Thanks
Good question - 116. And it ran for three days. I forgot to change the parameters to make this one run for the same time. Default is 24 hours. But the percentages of the first poll didn't change much from the first 6 hours.
This one has 143 votes. It looks like most of the additional votes went to none of the above.
Thanks for your reply!
I cannot vote because my choice, whatever it is, is not on the list. Is there a Democratic candidate with a real chance of winning, discounting RFK Jr? Don't get me wrong, I like Kennedy. And he is clearly not a Republican (I am a registered Democrat). Were he to be elected, I would likely not be the only person holding my breath in anticipation of assassination. Could the nation survive such a horror?
Good question. At the very least it would be cathartic.
Yeah I hear you That makes sense. We have a one party state of Demicans and Republicrats and anybody who really wants to be taken seriously needs to distance themselves from the de facto uniparty corporatocracy.
It's a sorry state of affairs.
Thanks and agreed. Any corrections or additions are welcome from anyone.
April Fools!
Time will tell.