An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it. Unknown.
Pfizer documents recently released by the FDA prove graphene oxide is used to make the Pfizer jabs.
This post builds on an earlier post regarding the PEGylated lipid nanoparticles used to create the trojan horse technology in the covid jabs that we’ve been told carries the synthetic mRNA spike protein payload into cells. As explained, evidence points to the use of similar technologies in flu vaccines for years before covid. There is also the aluminum, nickel, barium, chrome, stainless steel and other metallic particles being used in the chemtrail cocktails being sprayed in our skies. All of this plays into information presented in this post.
In case you missed it, here is that earlier post.
If all of the evidence I’ve presented over the past two years was not enough to convince you that graphene oxide (GO) nano particles exist in the covid jabs, thanks to Trump appointed Federal Judge Mark Pittman’s order in a Texas court to release documents that the FDA wanted to hold for 75 years, we have a recently released document proving graphene oxide was used to make the Pfizer jabs.
This is one of the pertinent sentences from page 7.
3.4. Cryo-EM of P2 S
For TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 μL purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold
Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide.
What this document is describing is how GO is used in the manufacturing process to make PEGylated lipid nanoparticles more stable. As I’ve frequently pointed out over the past few years, GO has been found in lesser or greater amounts by numerous independent researchers in various jab lots made by all of the mRNA manufacturers.
As you read this post, keep in mind these two things.
1 Graphene oxide can enter the brain.
2 Graphene oxide is a high malleable, very conductive material that can be directed from a distance by specific EMF wave lengths to perform specific tasks.
onward
In several early posts I mentioned that I’ve never owned a cell phone. My original reasons for not having one had nothing to do with their potential dangers, I didn’t know anything about that until well after they had become ubiquitous. The reason was, I felt like I was already spending too much time on my laptop and I didn’t want to become a slave to another technology that can be carried with me all the time. I realize this has hampered my ability to promote this ‘stack but then, this ‘stack is not my be-all.
Knowing what I now know, I’m glad I never indulged in a cell phone. As will be pointed out, they’re dangerous on multiple levels.
In earlier posts I’ve described the covid jabs as bioweapons. To reiterate, I view the PEGylated nanotech in the jabs to be more harmful to human biology than the supposed synthetic biological components of the jabs. This is sort of how I now look at cell phones. In and of themselves, they are not biological weapons, but the EMF’s they emit and the external transmission EMF technologies they depend on are harmful to the biology of all life.
basic danger level 1
The effects of the dangers of radiation from cell phones is becoming increasingly documented. They’re linked to lower sperm counts, reproductive issues in women, reduced cognitive abilities in children exposed to them during pregnancy, poor developmental skills in children who are exposed early, brain cancer in anyone who holds them next to their head (Senator John McCain who died of a brain tumor right where he held his phone) and numerous other issues.
iPhones even come with a warning to not hold the phone next to your body. From an iPhone manual.
To reduce the exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built in speakerphone, the supplied headphone, or the similar accessories. Carry iPhone at least 10 mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels. Cases with metal parts ay change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested…
The last part may be referring to the focalizing effects that metal shapes can perform. This is what various antenna shapes do.
bees
An example that I find particularly frightening is that when exposed to a cell phone placed in a hive, worker bees are not able to find their way back to the hive. When exposed to wider EMF’s they become so befuddled that they lose all sense of purpose. Sounds like some kids I know that constantly have their noses buried in a cell phone.
For an in-depth video about these well documented dangers I recommend watching this video of Dr. Devra Davis discussing all of this at a conference in Australia.
the more insidious danger level 2
Some of you know of the WHO whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger. While giving a presentation on graphene oxide (GO) found in the jabs at the recent Covid Pandemic Stockholm Conference, her microphone was turned off. To add insult to injury, well known ‘front line’ doctor Ryan Cole then interrupted her presentation and tried to gaslight her.
Apparently, she was right over the target.
I recently came across this video of Dr. Stuckelberger talking about GO, parasites, RFID, metals and nano circuitry that have all been found in the jabs, which further confirms much of what I’ve been writing about over the past several years.
She also confirms what I pointed out in the above post that the most harmful components in the jabs are not the biological payload. She points to tests on covid vials done by Dr. Nagasi of Canada and Dr. Monteverde in Chile both of whom have shown there to be no nitrogen or phosphorus in the vials. To be accurate, Dr. Nagase has more recently found minute amounts of one or the other in some vials, but the fact that they couldn’t find it in all vials brings into question the reality of biological components in the jabs. Basic biology tells us that these two elements are necessary for biological life to exist. Dr. Astrids conclusion - there is no biological payload in the covid jabs. She confirms what I said, that the bioweapon is the nanotechnology used to build the Trojan Horse.
She also talks about how GO can be coded to carry information that mimics molecules to inform our cells to produce mRNA spike protein. In other words, technology is acting as a bioweapon.
She also mentions Dr. Charles Morgan who is a neuroscientist with a very dark background working for the CIA.
In this video Dr. Morgan talks about how to take a biological signal and turn it into an electrical signal, amplify it and then broadcast it around the world.
He goes on to discuss editing software for genes and using technology to get this software into cells to carry out this task. He explains how the technology can be “engineered to do anything” “to kill only one person in the world”, by programing to target their specific genetic code. In this 3/5/22 post I looked into this topic from another angle - bioweapon labs in Ukraine making bioweapons that target specific ethnicities.
These are the three key points Dr. Morgan highlights about what is known as DNA steganography.
Cells can be be designed for specific activities and targets.
Cells can be strategically placed.
Cells can be remotely controlled.
Bacteria, which can go into an undetectable and very long lived dormant spore state, can also serve as a storehouse for information. They can then be reactivated upon demand to carry out their function.
“the brain is the current battlespace”
Dr. Stuckelberger doesn’t mention him, but another person dealing in these dark arts - whom I’ve written about in earlier posts - is neuroscientist Dr. James Giordano. In this 2018 lecture to the Modern Warfare Institute at West Point he gives a presentation about where neuroscience is headed. The talk is titled Neuroscience and Technology (neuroS/T) - Putting the Brain at Our Fingertips. His four key points are -
To harness and engage neuroS/T in convergent, multidisciplinary approaches to study, define, predict and influence human ecologies.
To affect human activities on individual, group and population levels.
To affect human relations on local, regional and global levels.
Influence postures and conduct of national security and defense agendas.
If you think this sounds like they are designing ways to control the masses, you would be correct.
Some of the topics discussed are; neuro-cyber informatics, novel pharmaceuticals, cyber linked neurocog manipulation, directed energy devices, neuromicrobiologicals, nanoneurotechnologicals, organic neurotoxins (read that, snake venom).
“The goal”, says Dr. Giordano, “is to make you tick the way I want you to”.
Given this information, here is a potential scenario that could be played out, or may have already played out numerous times. Let’s say that someone has gained a large audience and is saying things the government doesn’t like. This technology allows them to tap into that persons medical records and use the information gleaned to target their physical or mental weaknesses by sending soft information to the screen of their cell phone, information that may cause them stress and exacerbate their condition. Or, they may send an EMF signal through the cell phone that activates the hard nanotech in their body to do something that exacerbates their condition. Or both… maybe to the point of killing them. The death is listed as natural and no one is the wiser.
Or maybe a large anti-government protest is getting out of hand and they want to shut it down. They could use directed energy beams on the crowd (already being done, as I pointed out here) to directly initiate latent nanotech in the jabbed and possibly, to a lesser extent, in the unjabbed, to do something insidious. Or they could send a signal to the cell phones of the protestors to direct nanotech to accomplish the same. Or both.
DARPA has already awarded contracts to develop this technology. In 2019 one was awarded to Battelle which is working on, to no ones surprise, an injectable nanoparticle technology that can be used for bidirectional brain control. Unpacked, that means that if you have the technology in you, someone can remotely control your brain. We are being told that this is meant to be used to enable “able bodied soldiers” to communicate with each other. Right.
Dr. Giordano’s lecture is an uncannily accurate prediction of exactly how the covid pandemic played out. He describes how the planting of a few cases of illness in cities here and there can be used to weaponize the fear of some disease and how that can be used as psychological programming to make every “hypochondriac run to their doctor” and make much of the rest of the population wonder about their safety. He describes how the CDC would be disrupted and how this could be used to disrupt the social fabric of a society. How it can even become geopolitical. Sounds all to familiar.
He then goes on to discuss how the technology already exits to create controllable nanotech to auto aggregate or aggregate in certain parts of the body based on biological and chemical conditions in ones body. In other words, attack a persons weak points. We’ve seen this sadly play out in countless cases.
He also explains that nanotech can be aerosolized, which verifies what Elan Freeland said in our 11/22/21 interview, that this technology is being emitted in chem trails. Which means even those of us who are unjabbed may have it, although to a much lesser degree than those who took, and are still taking the jabs.
Dr. Giordano explains how controllable robotic units at the nanoscale can also be aerosolized and programmed to swarm and integrate themselves through the eyes, nose and mouth to be taken up by the vascular system to cause clots and generally wreck havoc.
Did this guy plan covidcon for the elite globalists?
Keep in mind Dr. Giordano’s presentation was made in 2018. We also need to remember that he is only presenting a small portion of what’s going on and… only from what has been declassified. How much farther has this tech gone than what we are being told?
According to what’s being found in the jabs, much further.
Dr. Giodano explains that another way to target an individual is to genetically manipulate bugs, say a tick, to make it produce deadly toxins. That tick could then be planted on a targeted individual by an inconspicuous passerby on the street. He also subtly refers to viruses as bugs.
We’ve all now witnessed Dr. Giordano’s information played out with covidcon. Are we now seeing it played out with the management of the American mind regarding the war in Ukraine?
Your cell phone and the EMF technologies upon which it depends are the primary means through which this technology is being weaponized.
But the real goal is to take away our spiritual connection to God, our soul - that which makes us human - and do away with the need for cell phones altogether by turning us all into walking, communicating antennas.
Don’t be fooled. It’s the mark of the beast.
Ditch your cell phone. It’s a tool of Satan.
> and your cell phone is the bioweapon
It has always been so. I never owned one and never will. An aside. Have you ever noticed the faces of those who grow a large portion of the vegetables and fruits from their own garden. They radiate health and contentment.
Now look at the folks that shop for food in the supermarket. Even though the food is easier to procure the faces of the people are faces of stress. I see something like that with people connected and tethered by their cell phones.
Look into the sudden death of Andreas Noack when he was presenting on graphene in sheets of a single molecule thickness, and their use in the Covid19 vaccines. It is chilling.
https://eraoflight.com/2021/12/10/german-chemist-dr-andreas-noack-found-dead-after-exposing-graphene-hydroxide-in-covid-vaccines/