There have been number of things come up recently that are worthy of attention, so I hope you’ll bear with me as I try to cover some of them.
First off, I want to provide another opinion about the movie The Sound of Freedom. I’ve tried several times to see this movie but have not yet been able to see it. Perhaps divine guidance has prevented me from seeing it. What has recently changed my mind about ever seeing it is the backlash coming from the survivors of human trafficking. What follows is a video from one of the more outspoken opponents of the Sound of Freedom and a survivor of sex trafficking, Madyson Marquette. She also helps rescue trafficked kids, talks about 990’s, Tim Ballarad and his Mormon connections, the Nazarene fund, the corrupt Operation Underground Railroad (OUR - Time Ballard its on the board) connection, the Hollywood connection, the demonic aspects and the fact that what needs to happen is eradication of trafficking, not just awareness as is faithfully portrayed by those promoting the Sound of Freedom.
And here we have to ask, just exactly what are they promoting…?
She also lambasts Tim Ballard, Jim Caviezal (who played Ballard), Mel Gibson (who played a big role in getting the movie made) for not ever talking to any trafficked survivors, before, during, or since making the movie. She then lays into Tim Ballard who she says is on the Nazarene fund and who is laundering money to Glen Beck who is also on the OUR board.
Like me, M.M. has been censored on social media for talking about these issues, and understandably, she is upset that the people I just mentioned are getting a lot of coverage on social media to promote the movie and are making a lot of money from all the free publicity while she and other survivors are being censored and shut down. Folks, this ain’t right. I feel for their plight.
She presents a number of issues she feels people need to understand if they truly want to understand human trafficking.
Tim Ballard has long and highly questionable ties to the Mormon church and its historic policy of supporting polygamy. Lynn Packer is an investigative reporter who lives in Utah and has long written about the corruption and child abuse that exists, especially within the polygamous families of the LDS Church. Lynn has written extensively about Tim Ballards corruption (see below).
Full disclosure - 40 years ago I lived in Moab, Utah, considered by many to be the outdoor adventure capital of the US. While living there I ran the Colorado river, drove a logging truck (out of the La Sal Mountains), hiked the canyons, swam in numerous canyon streams, got lost hiking at night on several occasions and generally spent my time there soaking up Gods magnificent creation.
I also got to know a lot of Mormons as well as Jack Mormons (former hard-core Mormons). I’m here to tell you that some of the stories I’ve heard are as chilling as any you will read about in the links I’ve provided here.
If you want to take a deeper dive into this topic here are but a few of the articles on this and similar topics from American Crime Journal. Please make good use of that link to read the posts below.
Mormon Stories: Sound of Freedom featuring Anna Merlan, Tim Marchman and Lynn Packer
O.U.R. Quietly Exposes Tim Ballard’s Big Lie
OUR & the LDS Church’s Promotional Movies
OUR’s Hookers from Heaven
UTAH SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE ALLEGATIONS
O.U.R. Attorney and Firm Kirton McConkie Helps LDS Church Cover up Sex Abuse
Polaris Project is “deeply concerned” over OUR’s “Numbers Game”
COMING SOON: The $30 Million Nazarene Fund Scam
Tim Ballard and Glenn Beck hatch scheme to obtain $30 million “If Glenn Beck and Tim Ballard really gave a shit about Christian minorities in Afghanistan, they would have been here 18 months ago” Tim Ballard and several of his non-profits including Operation Underground Railroad and The Nazarene Fund have been under multiple criminal investigations…
a hypothetical story about censorship
Let me take you back to a time well before the internet and cell phones, a time when the primary form of communication was land line telephones. Allow me to set up a hypothetical story. Let’s say the year is 1971 - a landmark year for me because that was the year I was worrying about whether or not I was going to be drafted to become cannon fodder in Viet Nam - a war I did not believe in, at all. It was also in the fall of that year that I arrived at Faith Baptist Bible College in Ankeny, Iowa as an underage 17 year old. Several months after settling in to that school I learned I was going to have to take a mandatory full shot. As I’ve explained in previous posts, that flu shot gave me a serious case of pneumonia and nearly killed me. That event set off many life changes, a big one being that because of the disregard for my life and the hypocrisy that befell me from the school nurse to the staff, I became disenchanted with Christianity. It has taken me a lifetime to overcome that and make my way back to the teachings of Jesus, but I still eschew all forms of institutionalized Christianity.
Another big change that arose from that event was to reevaluate my position on vaccines - to never take another one for the rest of my life. That decision has served me very well since 1971.
But let’s get back to that hypothetical story.
Let’s say I was talking on the phone to my parents, who in 1971 were several states away, and I told them I didn’t want to go fight in Viet Nam because I thought the whole thing was a big waste of taxpayer money and that I didn’t like seeing all that money going to the military industrial complex - not Americans - and because I held no grudge against the Vietnamese people for wanting freedom.
Let’s say I also told my parents I was going to have to take a flu shot the college had made mandatory, and that I didn’t want to take it. Suddenly the phone company cuts in on the line and says, “We don’t like what you’re saying about the military industrial complex or this flu shot so we are going to terminate this and all future discussion”. Of course that would not have happened back then because free speech was still allowed at that time. Anyone could say anything they wanted over the phone and no one ever got censored. Or at least I never got censored nor did anyone I knew. In the coming years, as I strove to overcome my lack of understanding of how the world actually worked, I would meet a lot of radical people who did knew a few people who had been censored, but the numbers were minuscule compared to today.
Unfortunately I didn’t have access to a phone back then, something that was not that uncommon then. No one gave it much thought. So my parents never knew their son was fearful of being drafted nor did they know their underage son was going to be injected with a toxic substance that might kill him… without their consent.
I may have sent a letter or two to let them know I had been sick, but I likely failed to make it sound convincing. In fact, it wasn’t until I drove home for Christmas that I filled them in and they became concerned. After they sent me to our family doctor, who took X-rays of my lungs and found them severely scarred, we learned that I had suffered through a severe case of pneumonia. The school nurse kept trying to downplay my illness because it was only bad at night and she never saw me at night.
I’m telling this story because the recent ruling by Judge Terry Doughty in the Louisiana Western District court against the Biden administration. It has widespread implications which theoretically, because I’ve been widely censored across all of Googles platforms since at least mid 2021, should mean that I am no longer to be censored.
Writing in the Federalist, here is what Jordan Boyd said about the ruling.
The federal judge who issued a July 4 preliminary injunction blocking the Biden regime from colluding with Big Tech to censor Americans denied the administration’s motion to stay on Monday.
Less than one week after he agreed the federal government appeared to lead “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history” and is “alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech,” Judge Terry Doughty of Lousiana’s Western District Court ruled against the Biden administration’s assertion that agencies “face irreparable harm with each day the injunction remains in effect.”
“Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears,” Doughty wrote in his 13-page ruling. “It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social-media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms.”
In spite of the ruling, I am still being censored. Nothing has changed. Is the ruling an empty promise? Are large tech firms like Google so confident in their evil agenda that they have no fear of a Louisiana Judges ruling?
Of course theoretically, Google is owned by Alphabet. But who owns Alphabet? Here is the first level breakdown by Kamil Franek.
Here we see our old globalist nemesis Vanguard and BlackRock again, not to mention Page, Brin and Schmidt.
If we look at when my censorship began we can see that it was well after Biden had taken office and his administration had begun their campaign of illegally colluding with big tech platforms to censor speech the Biden Administration had determined was not aligned with it’s official narratives. So my censorship is directly linked to the legal points highlighted by Judge Doughty as part of the illegal measures that the Biden Administration has undertaken with big tech platforms to censor the speech of individuals it deemed to be dissenters, like myself.
I have been unable to find out exactly how or for what specific reason Google chose to censor me across all of it platforms but I suspect it has to do with the fact that I was still using gmail at the time. It had come to the attention of those who were looking closely into these matters (myself among them) that Google and other tech platforms had developed algorithms that allowed them to search for keywords that they (and the Biden administration?) had deemed as words or speech that signaled that the user was not following the official narrative, that the person was a dissenter. Since not following the official narrative has been one of my calling cards since I began writing this ‘stack nearly 3 years ago, it became clear that the algorithm caught me exercising my First Amendment right on gmail.
I first began to learn I was being censored when all of my comments on YouTube (owned by Google) were taken down shortly after being posted. I soon made the connection between Google and Youtube and stopped using gmail and switched to using Protonmail full time, which I had signed up for in 2019.
We now know that big tech platforms were communicating with each other and I soon found out I was also censored on Facebook. I don’t use Facebook but I know that folks who were trying to share links to some of my posts were unable to do so. More recently Facebook apparently decided I was not so bad after all because I can see from my Substack dashboard that for some time now I’ve been getting a dribble of views and subscribers from Facebook.
The moral of this part of the story is, if you value your first amendment rights, don’t use gmail. In fact, we should all be boycotting Google, it is an evil organization.
If this were 1982 Google would be dismantled for violating anti-trust laws. Lest we forget, it was in 1982 when Ma Bell was broken up for violating anti-trust laws - laws that pale in comparison to what Google has been breaking.
the congressional hearings on the weaponization of the government
Early this last week I watched all 3 hours and 57 minutes of the congressional select subcommittee hearings on the weaponization of the federal government (having mostly to do with censorship by the Biden administration). Maybe it was because I have some skin in the game, maybe it was hearing RFK Jr and other witnesses make some very astute comments, maybe it was feeling my ire rise as 102 illegitimate democrats ridiculously tried to censor RFK Jr from speaking at a hearing on censorship. If you haven’t seen this, you might want to watch it just to get an idea of how far away from the First Amendment and the rest of the Constitution many democrats (and some Republicans) have moved. It’s truly unbelievable. How these people retain power and legitimacy with their constituents boggles the mind.
I also found this round-table with 4 attorneys who have all worked with CHD at various points in time, discussing the events of the hearings on weaponization and the legal ramifications of the loss of our First Amendment rights, to be enlightening.
Does any of this mean I endorse RFK Jr for president? Not at this time. From my perspective he needs to deal with all the baggage he’s carrying regarding germ theory, his comments to researcher and virus de-bunker Eric Coppolino in 2022 about there being some questions regarding germ theory. More recently, those comments have fallen out of accord with his recent comments about germs being weaponized to strike down certain ethnicities. If one believes that the existence of germs is questionable, one cannot then go on to say that germs can be ethnically targeted. He has woven a tangled web and he now appears to be caught in it. I’ll have more to say about all of that in another post. For now I recommend reading this recent post from Christine Massey. She lays it all out very nicely.
censorship continued
More full disclosure - I wanted to mention CHD because I was recently contacted by them to give a preliminary interview regarding the events I described in my last post.
CHD wanted me to join Googles version of zoom to participate in this interview. I informed the woman interviewing me that that may not work because I was censored across all Google platforms. I told her I was all set up on Zoom and asked if we could use that. I was thinking that surely they had interviewed other folks who had also been censored and would not be able to use Googles video conference call platform. She did try to get on Zoom, but was having trouble. Considering RFK’s recent comments about big tech censorship, I was a bit surprised that she wasn’t familiar with alternatives to big tech. She got back to me and said she wasn’t going to be able to use Zoom because she couldn’t figure it out. She sent me a link to join on Google. I got part way through the process with this Google link and came to a drop down menu that would have allowed me to join. However, the drop down menu would not allow me to select any of the options - I was banned on that Google platform as well.
Again, this was well after Judge Doughty’s decision.
I got back with the gal from CHD and informed her that I was indeed unable to use her favored platform and explained why. She was surprised, saying she had never encountered that before.
Does this say something about the safe people that CHD tends to interview? I briefly told her about my experience with gmail’s algorithm and that I had been censored since mid 2021.
It seems that if CHD is serious about covering censorship they would be interested in talking to those of us who have suffered the severe censorship consequences of globalist big tech platforms.
Fortunately shortly after that she was able to determine how to use Zoom and we conducted the preliminary interview on it.
Thank you Kyle - this is a great post for multiple reasons.
First, the succinct information, including your own actual experiences with and around entities responsible for Sound of Freedom.
Second, Madyson Marquette's video.
Third, your history and brief summary of censorship.
Fourth, your link to the censorship hearings (which I actually watched live on my computer) and your interesting dealings with CHD.
And I'm really looking forward to the interview you did with them! If we get to hear/see it.
Hope you're feeling good now, since your extremely awful - but unsurprisingly so - ICU experience.
This post reflects that you may be sharper than ever.
Thanks.
So glad to see this post as it proves you haven't had a relapse - or decided to take that trip to Colima NOW to pick up your fav salt product.
What a coincidence you talking about Judge Doughty's 4th of July Decision granting Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction. Last night I finished reading Doughty's 155-page Decision. Pages 1-85 contain excerpts from 200+ emails etc received in Discovery. Pages 86-155 are Doughty's analysis of the arguments and evidence presented by the Plaintiffs and Defendants. This is a document that will be studied by law students as well as practicing attorneys for decades to come. As Doughty says, the Biden etal coercion of social media platforms to censor the free speech of Americans is the biggest assault on the First Amendment in the history of our nation. Doughty concludes his Decision with this quotation from President Harry S. Truman: "Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one place to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear."
The Decision is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23867004-08917380420?responsive=1&title=1