The moments where the satellites were overhead could have been chosen for that reason. I could imagine it is a satisfying challenge to master. And that would be an adequate exercise for the space force. With new missiles, you can just let them drop into the water. There it's no question that the destruction part works. With this newer ki…
The moments where the satellites were overhead could have been chosen for that reason. I could imagine it is a satisfying challenge to master. And that would be an adequate exercise for the space force. With new missiles, you can just let them drop into the water. There it's no question that the destruction part works. With this newer kind of tech, you still need to test them on real life targets to see if the destruction works as expected, or if no real expectations, to find out what they actually do. Hence the barring of the experiment site with the black "dust fence". But the fact that the satellites were there tells me nothing about whether it was China.
I agree with all of that. Although as I pointed out, China certainly has the capability. But as I also pointed out, due to blossoming, I don't think these were fired from space. More likely from planes or the DEW facilities on Maui.
So then it would be a false flag. Making people "connect the dots" that you provide for them to connect. Heather Heying once said that on Dark Horse podcast. That their method is all the time, providing dots for us to connect to generate the picture that they want us to see, to reach the conclusions they want us to come to, all the while feeling proud how smart we were to figure out something that they however had wanted us to "figure out "all along. Weaponizing pattern recognition? (ok it's not new, Chomsky, Mausfeld). But what's concerning, is that with Lahaina, they could have been practicing being able to provoke war in the sense of triggering NATO article 5 by false flag in a bigger way than such things have been done or attempted in the past. Btw - you mention that humidity makes it difficult for the laser to not lose too much energy to blossoming. And that the air in Maui is always very humid. Someone also mentioned that due to the high air humidity they had difficulty believing that a natural fire could have been so devastating. I don't know if air humidity can negatively affect the kindling and the sustainment of a natural fire. But the talk about humidity reminds me that Dr Judy Wood (" Where did the towers go") pointed out that around the time of the fall of the twin towers, so, already before, there had been a marked change in barometric/atmospheric pressure and also in humidity. Atmospheric pressure dropped, and the air became much drier in a very short timeframe (but that was an anomaly because normally with dropping pressure, humidity would increase if I got this right). Air became much drier within six hours or so, at a rate of 9% per hour which supposedly is not normal. It would be interesting to know if air became drier also in Lahaina. Then you might have had less blossoming too? Dr Wood seems to have thought that in NY, DEW had been used. Actually she said that the evidence pointed to that. I think she thought HAARP might have been involved. She said the people jumping, and the people in the windows seen undressing, might have done so to escape or mitigate microwave heat.
As to connecting dots, I believe that's part of the game plan. Some will get it right, others will not. The total effect is confusion, which may also be part of the game plan.
The drying out of the air would go to what I mentioned in the post that other weapons may have been used to clear a path for the primary HPM. Wood was well ahead of most but a lot more info has been gleaned since her early work. I would speculate that HARP may have been used to clear the air and then HPM's followed. I believe she was the one who pointed to the cars near the towers - but not close enough to catch fire - that had been burned to toast just as on Maui. That certainly would indicate the use of HPM's.
The moments where the satellites were overhead could have been chosen for that reason. I could imagine it is a satisfying challenge to master. And that would be an adequate exercise for the space force. With new missiles, you can just let them drop into the water. There it's no question that the destruction part works. With this newer kind of tech, you still need to test them on real life targets to see if the destruction works as expected, or if no real expectations, to find out what they actually do. Hence the barring of the experiment site with the black "dust fence". But the fact that the satellites were there tells me nothing about whether it was China.
I agree with all of that. Although as I pointed out, China certainly has the capability. But as I also pointed out, due to blossoming, I don't think these were fired from space. More likely from planes or the DEW facilities on Maui.
So then it would be a false flag. Making people "connect the dots" that you provide for them to connect. Heather Heying once said that on Dark Horse podcast. That their method is all the time, providing dots for us to connect to generate the picture that they want us to see, to reach the conclusions they want us to come to, all the while feeling proud how smart we were to figure out something that they however had wanted us to "figure out "all along. Weaponizing pattern recognition? (ok it's not new, Chomsky, Mausfeld). But what's concerning, is that with Lahaina, they could have been practicing being able to provoke war in the sense of triggering NATO article 5 by false flag in a bigger way than such things have been done or attempted in the past. Btw - you mention that humidity makes it difficult for the laser to not lose too much energy to blossoming. And that the air in Maui is always very humid. Someone also mentioned that due to the high air humidity they had difficulty believing that a natural fire could have been so devastating. I don't know if air humidity can negatively affect the kindling and the sustainment of a natural fire. But the talk about humidity reminds me that Dr Judy Wood (" Where did the towers go") pointed out that around the time of the fall of the twin towers, so, already before, there had been a marked change in barometric/atmospheric pressure and also in humidity. Atmospheric pressure dropped, and the air became much drier in a very short timeframe (but that was an anomaly because normally with dropping pressure, humidity would increase if I got this right). Air became much drier within six hours or so, at a rate of 9% per hour which supposedly is not normal. It would be interesting to know if air became drier also in Lahaina. Then you might have had less blossoming too? Dr Wood seems to have thought that in NY, DEW had been used. Actually she said that the evidence pointed to that. I think she thought HAARP might have been involved. She said the people jumping, and the people in the windows seen undressing, might have done so to escape or mitigate microwave heat.
As to connecting dots, I believe that's part of the game plan. Some will get it right, others will not. The total effect is confusion, which may also be part of the game plan.
The drying out of the air would go to what I mentioned in the post that other weapons may have been used to clear a path for the primary HPM. Wood was well ahead of most but a lot more info has been gleaned since her early work. I would speculate that HARP may have been used to clear the air and then HPM's followed. I believe she was the one who pointed to the cars near the towers - but not close enough to catch fire - that had been burned to toast just as on Maui. That certainly would indicate the use of HPM's.