You are posing philosophical questions in a world that only wants to trust science aka control, the cousin of fear. I believe people let themselves be abused due to a lack of Self-worth, fueled by the need to belong to a tribe, regardless if those tribal leaders have the individual's best interests at heart. Moral of the story: venture beyond the pale as a warrior of that old dying group, hope some will join you, and find or start a new tribe.
The battle stakes are too high to change.it us or them. Their lies are so obvious that I suspect a bigger concocted crisis will push aside their use of us in their gene manipulation experiments.
Hi Kyle, I met you at Compass and am glad to be supporting you here. Another good source of death information is Mark Crispin Miller, who (among other things) compiles a weekly set of obituaries of people who have "died suddenly" around the world - https://substack.com/@markcrispinmiller?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
My son-in law, when confronted by the statistics from Ed Dowd's "Cause Unknown", responded with the old saw of Mark Twain's "lies, damn lies and statistics". I responded with another old saw from Twain; "It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled." That was the end of that discussion because we love each other.
Amazing. How old are these so-called "scientists"? Because I can clearly remember in 8th grade science class in the '70s, my teacher saying something to the effect of, "Science is questioning everything, even if you think it's right. So keep questioning." There's no way in hell to improve any kind of "science" if we never question it. I'll just repeat what I often say (and many here may be too young to remember), but there was a time when 4 out of 5 doctors recommended smoking camel filterless cigarettes. Guess we should have never questioned that either going by today's "logic".
Excellent research and writing, Kyle. We do what we can to reach the people who are ready to open their minds to the fact that we've all been programmed with lies that make us distrust our Creator-given faculties.
How can a county/city be considered liberal if it run or influenced by Raytheon? In the early sixties radicals characterized liberals as spineless chameleons. The corporate fascist capitalist PR mercenaries took that narrative to demonize liberals to support Reaganite agenda. Reagan, already suffering a rigid brain from Alzheimers, could deliver a script convincingly. He made a brilliant sock puppet for corporate fascists. My point is: Please do not use labels to enforce your message. That is a tactic used by the billionaire class to divide the 99%. Here is a characterization of liberals by Phil Ochs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cdqQ2BdgOA
There is a biblical answer to "why government" and it is to maintain order. There is, however, no claim that governments will do what they are there to do and not do the opposite. The idea seems to be to cooperate with them where you can and to oppose what they say to do when you must.
The biblical sampling of historical governments, their behaviors, and the results form a pattern of prosperity, corruption, and downfall. This is the way it was, and the way it is. If there is anything unique in what we see now, it is that there seems to be a push toward a single, deeply corrupt global government, and in many ways it appears that it is already here due to the "lock step" actions of the nations. Since the end result in every cycle appears to be destruction of the nation with very bad things happening to its people, a single world government would seem to speak poorly for the direction of life on earth.
This would be a very good thing to stop, but first it is important to understand what really happens. I don't believe that that understanding is widespread. I believe that to understand, we have to look at how the government, represented by political systems, intelligence agencies, industrial powers, and organized crime -- these are by no means distinct -- is a reflection of the people governed.
While the common view (among those that can even see the problem) is that these bad actors are the cause, if that is not the case then what is stopping them going to accomplish? Has stopping them in the past solved the problem? Will stopping them this time solve it? Is this thing now at this scale -- with all the nations weirdly cooperating instead of many of the large ones pushing back -- even stoppable by our own efforts?
I don't know about all that, but I do know that we've got our own problems and they tend toward being quite serious, though they certainly may not appear that way to us. I won't go into that here, but it is something to consider.
My understanding is that Trump stopped direct US funding of the WHO and redirected the funds to Bill Gates' GAVI which then gave them to the WHO. Thus, what Trump did was a pass through, a morally repugnant sleight of hand. If this is not the case, please correct me.
I'm old enough to remember when science was based on facts and the existing data supported the scientific theories of the day.
You are posing philosophical questions in a world that only wants to trust science aka control, the cousin of fear. I believe people let themselves be abused due to a lack of Self-worth, fueled by the need to belong to a tribe, regardless if those tribal leaders have the individual's best interests at heart. Moral of the story: venture beyond the pale as a warrior of that old dying group, hope some will join you, and find or start a new tribe.
The battle stakes are too high to change.it us or them. Their lies are so obvious that I suspect a bigger concocted crisis will push aside their use of us in their gene manipulation experiments.
Hi Kyle, I met you at Compass and am glad to be supporting you here. Another good source of death information is Mark Crispin Miller, who (among other things) compiles a weekly set of obituaries of people who have "died suddenly" around the world - https://substack.com/@markcrispinmiller?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
The nature of science is to always question it! Asshole!
The truth does not need protection from censorship. Only lies do.
My son-in law, when confronted by the statistics from Ed Dowd's "Cause Unknown", responded with the old saw of Mark Twain's "lies, damn lies and statistics". I responded with another old saw from Twain; "It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled." That was the end of that discussion because we love each other.
Amazing. How old are these so-called "scientists"? Because I can clearly remember in 8th grade science class in the '70s, my teacher saying something to the effect of, "Science is questioning everything, even if you think it's right. So keep questioning." There's no way in hell to improve any kind of "science" if we never question it. I'll just repeat what I often say (and many here may be too young to remember), but there was a time when 4 out of 5 doctors recommended smoking camel filterless cigarettes. Guess we should have never questioned that either going by today's "logic".
Excellent research and writing, Kyle. We do what we can to reach the people who are ready to open their minds to the fact that we've all been programmed with lies that make us distrust our Creator-given faculties.
How can a county/city be considered liberal if it run or influenced by Raytheon? In the early sixties radicals characterized liberals as spineless chameleons. The corporate fascist capitalist PR mercenaries took that narrative to demonize liberals to support Reaganite agenda. Reagan, already suffering a rigid brain from Alzheimers, could deliver a script convincingly. He made a brilliant sock puppet for corporate fascists. My point is: Please do not use labels to enforce your message. That is a tactic used by the billionaire class to divide the 99%. Here is a characterization of liberals by Phil Ochs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cdqQ2BdgOA
Trump gave GAVI (Gates) over 1.16 Billion $.
Excellent analysis!
“Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and his “patient” Buster Keaton join forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch the hit music video TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
UNITE TO TAKE THESE EVIL MURDEROUS DEMONS OUT
Why do we even have predators, if all they do is devour us?
Why do we even have parasites, if all they do is weaken us?
Why do we even have criminals, if all they do is betray us?
Why do we even have liars, if all they do is confuse us?
I could keep this up all day. But suffice to say, I think you're a bit confused.
There is a biblical answer to "why government" and it is to maintain order. There is, however, no claim that governments will do what they are there to do and not do the opposite. The idea seems to be to cooperate with them where you can and to oppose what they say to do when you must.
The biblical sampling of historical governments, their behaviors, and the results form a pattern of prosperity, corruption, and downfall. This is the way it was, and the way it is. If there is anything unique in what we see now, it is that there seems to be a push toward a single, deeply corrupt global government, and in many ways it appears that it is already here due to the "lock step" actions of the nations. Since the end result in every cycle appears to be destruction of the nation with very bad things happening to its people, a single world government would seem to speak poorly for the direction of life on earth.
This would be a very good thing to stop, but first it is important to understand what really happens. I don't believe that that understanding is widespread. I believe that to understand, we have to look at how the government, represented by political systems, intelligence agencies, industrial powers, and organized crime -- these are by no means distinct -- is a reflection of the people governed.
While the common view (among those that can even see the problem) is that these bad actors are the cause, if that is not the case then what is stopping them going to accomplish? Has stopping them in the past solved the problem? Will stopping them this time solve it? Is this thing now at this scale -- with all the nations weirdly cooperating instead of many of the large ones pushing back -- even stoppable by our own efforts?
I don't know about all that, but I do know that we've got our own problems and they tend toward being quite serious, though they certainly may not appear that way to us. I won't go into that here, but it is something to consider.
My understanding is that Trump stopped direct US funding of the WHO and redirected the funds to Bill Gates' GAVI which then gave them to the WHO. Thus, what Trump did was a pass through, a morally repugnant sleight of hand. If this is not the case, please correct me.