the transhumanist agenda is underway

detox and decouple from technology now!

To those who can hear me, I say - do not despair. The misery that is now upon us is but the passing of greed - the bitterness of men who fear the way of human progress. The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish…

Soldiers! don’t give yourselves to brutes - men who despise you - enslave you - who regiment your lives - tell you what to do - what to think and what to feel! Who drill you - diet you - treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don’t give yourselves to these unnatural men - machine men with machine minds and machine hearts! You are not machines! You are not cattle! You are men! You have the love of humanity in your hearts! You don’t hate! Only the unloved hate - the unloved and the unnatural! Soldiers! Don’t fight for slavery! Fight for liberty! Charlie Chaplin - The Great Dictator 1940

First an update on a problem I mentioned a few weeks ago - being blocked from signing into Substack. When I first contacted Substack about this I explained that the issue was associated with the Captcha app we all have to use to sign in. When trying to use Captcha I would get a notice saying “something went wrong”. I sent a screenshot of that to Substack with my first email to them. No word back for days. Meanwhile I discovered a work-around that would allow me to get in. I was able to make another post and reply to a few comments.

I finally heard from Substack that the problem was being worked on by their engineers.

Some days later I got an email form Substack saying the problem had been fixed. I tried to sign in and got nowhere… not even the previous “something went wrong” notice came up. I tried the work-around and that also failed to work. Instead of being fixed, the problem was worse than before. I was completely blocked from signing into my own site. According to Substack, all writers own their content. In other words, I was being blocked from gaining access to information that I legally own.

With this new twist it became even more obvious that the problem was with Captcha, so I did a little research. Turns out Luis von Ahn, who invented Capthca, sold it to Google in 2009. Learning that was an aha moment.

Sometime during 2020 (maybe earlier), Google developed an algorithm that allowed them to find words like plandemic, scamdemic, vaxx, toxic jabs, ivermectin and many other words that indicated someone may not be fully on board with the covidcon agenda. This ‘stack has been rife with words like that since I began writing here in November of 2020. I was also commenting on many sites using words like that. But the trap was likely sprung in my gmail (Google) account where I was using those words frequently during 2020. I first discovered I was being censored in early 2021 when I found my comments on YouTube (owned by Google) were being removed. Soon, I wasn’t even allowed to comment. I wrote about this censorship in a post around then.

Shortly after learning about this I dropped gmail like a hot potato.

Fast forward to my aha moment a week ago when I learned that Captcha is owned by Google. I sent an email to Substack reminding them that according to their own agreement, writers own their content.

I asked Substack why they were allowing Google to serve as gatekeeper for writers like myself.

Why does Substack have an outside corporation serving as a gate keeper to determine who can and cannot get into Substack?  That should be the responsibility of Substack, not google.  According to your policy, this is my Substack.  I own the information it contains.  Why are you allowing google to block me from gaining access to my own material?  There are some legal issues being breached here.

The next day (this past Wednesday) the issue was resolved. A problem that had existed since the 18th of February was resolved less than 24 hours after sending them the above notice.

To date, Substack has said nothing about why it allows Google to control writers access to material they own.

‘Nuff said about that.

onward

Although I began calling the covid jabs bioweapons back in 2021 and later clarified what I meant by that, confusion remains. Let’s delve into that further.

As I pointed out back in 2021, graphene oxide and none of the other components of the mRNA Polyethylene (PEGylated) lipid nanotechnologies are biological. They’re man made. Anyone with a modicum of critical thinking skills can understand the problems that arise when nonbiological materials - toxins, things our bodies have never had to deal with in 250,000 years of human existence - get injected directly into the blood stream.

So why do I consider the covid jab a biological weapon? The short answer is, although the active ingredients are not biological, they’re effect is toxic to human biology. As I explained several years ago, this is because they’re part of the satanic transhumanist agenda to merge humans with technology.

The following is my 7/2021 post (the first of many) when I began discussing hydrogels and the role graphene oxide plays in transhumanism. That post also has some of the first hard proof about graphene oxide being in the jabs. I also wrote about the fact that graphene oxide is a major component of Gates funded hydrogel technology.

the nitty gritty

I’m bringing this up now because in a recent interview with Dr. Ana Mihalcea, Karen Kingston pointed out that there are hydrogels that look strangely similar to the now infamous spike protein. In short, what we’ve been told is the “corona virus” - because it has a crown of fluted spikes surrounding a round ball - may actually be a hydrogel.

side note

When looking for the above image, several interesting things came to light. The search term I used was ‘photo spike protein virus’. First of all, none of the thousands of search results are “photos”. All are computer generated images like the one from the CDC above. Who programmed the information into the computers to generate these images? Who decided this was the spike protein? Who made the decision to tell us this was what the spike protein looked like? These questions will become more important as we go along.

Clearly these were the same people who told us the spike protein was responsible for covid. They also happen to be the same people who told us that the spike protein is being carried through the cell wall by the PEGylated lipid nanoparticle Trojan horse technology used in the covid jabs. This would be the folks at the NIH, the NIAID, the CDC, Pfizer, Moderna, Fauci, Gates and all the other big players.

Given what I wrote about in the first section of this post, perhaps the more important question is, who programmed the search engine to provide me with these images?

That, of course, would be Google, which means Google must be included with the other guilty parties.

The second thing to note is that when searching for a photo of that other critically important spike protein, the one we’ve been told was used in the mRNA covid jabs, no results come up. Zero.

So… on one hand we have the all-to-elusive covid virus, supposedly shown in the image above, for which Google provides thousands of results.

On the other hand we have the mRNA spike protein, which should be exceedingly well documented because we were told it was used in all the mRNA jabs. It has 0 search results.

When attempting to dispute claims about possible dangers of the spike protein, even factcheck.org shows us no photo, not even an image. All factcheck needs to do to silence the dispute about the existence of the covid virus is show a photo of it. They do not because they cannot. It doesn’t exist. Instead they regurgitate the official narrative from sources like the CDC and WHO.

Of course my photo search would have been incomplete if I had not gone to the largest source for scientific documents in the world, PubMed. Here is the search result I got from PubMed when I asked for photo of mRNA spike protein.

Here Science Magazine puts forth an ‘official description’ of the spike protein. There are no photos. The question becomes, if these ‘scientists’ can describe it, why can’t they show us a photo of what they’re describing? Don’t they have to be looking at it to describe it?

Does anyone else find it confusing that the coronavirus, which we’ve been told is responsible for the covid pandemic, is the spike protein, and that the cure we were told was put into the mRNA covid jabs, is the spike protein?

For the record, we are told that the actual spike proteins are the many extensions coming from the viron (the ball), not the whole thing in the image above.

We all know we’ve been lied to over an over again for the past four years. Are we being lied to about the spike protein? Is the spike protein not a spike protein? Or is it a component of transhumanist hydrogel technology?

explanations?

As regular readers know I’ve long talked about how germ theory has been in dispute since the idea was first put forth by Luis Pasteur in the 1860’s. Later, germ theory was seized upon by Rockefeller as a way to leverage petrochemical based medical profits. Thanks in large part to the Rockefeller/Carnegie funded Flexner report, germ theory became purposefully ingrained in the university system and eventually, the psyche of most people on earth.

Many decades later the covid program gets rolled out. We’re soon told the covid virus has been discovered and that the culprit is the spike protein “corona virus”. All through 2020/2021 I searched the internet for proof of its existence and… found nothing. I pointed that out here on numerous occasions over the ensuing years. I caught hell from all quarters for saying so (and still do). When I asked those challengers to show me the virus, none were able to do so.

back to karen kingston’s findings

As Dr. Ana Mialcea has been pointing out, numerous researchers around the world tested many covid vials for nitrogen and phosphorous and found none. Both elements need to be present for biology to exist. No nitrogen or phosphorous, no biological spike protein.

Now, Karen Kingston presents documentation showing something that looks just like what we have been told are the spike proteins are hydrogels (the two images in the upper left corner).

I thought the evidence that Karen Kingston presented was interesting but I wanted more proof. So I did some research on the two things in the upper left hand corner that look like the spike protein, in particular PFOB@MPEG nano emulsion. In this NIH paper we are told that these nano-emulsions were developed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because they can fluoresce.

In figure 1 of this paper we are shown another image of… a spike protein! Except it’s not called a spike protein. It’s called PFOB Nanoemulsion.

In figure 4 we are shown another image that we are told are nuclei preincubated with or w/o cytochalasin. Here is how wikipedia describes cytochalasin.

Cytochalasins are fungal metabolites that have the ability to bind to actin filaments and block polymerization and the elongation of actin. As a result of the inhibition of actin polymerization, cytochalasins can change cellular morphology, inhibit cellular processes such as cell division, and even cause cells to undergo apoptosis.

The nuclei are then exposed to PFOB-NE green for 128 minutes. Then they were exposed to DAPI blue. We are told the following images show the results.

Once again, on the left we have another image of something that looks like a spike protein.

Yes, it’s all very confusing. That’s likely purposeful. How does the nuclei get transformed into something that looks like a spike protein when it’s exposed to hydrogel spike proteins?

The image on the right is supposed to be the same nucleus after having been subjected numerous toxins, including cytochalasin. We are not told how many times this experiment was repeated. Nor are we told if anyone else has replicated the experiment to get the same results. We are just provided with two images of something that has been removed from its host, exposed to EMF’s, exposed to a number of different toxins and then imaged.

As I’ve said before, this would be like removing a tree from the forest, taking a sample of its tissue and exposing that sample to numerous toxins, all to learn how a forest functions.

Yet, we are supposed to believe that this confirms their conclusions. Time will tell if that is, or is not true. The big question for me is, why does the nuclei look like a nanogel spike protein after the exposures?

Karen presents another paper that shows more images of nanogels that look like the spike protein. These images look very similar to ones in the previous paper. This study discusses how the PH and specific EMF frequencies can affect the form and function of nanogels.

This is more verification of my long held concerns about EMF’s, cell towers and cell phones.

Wouldn’t it be convenient for the powers that shouldn’t be if the covid jab vials contained synthetic life in the form of a hydrogel that just happens to look like the spike protein - virus or mRNA, take your pick - that was spread around the world via the images above? Wouldn’t it be even more convenient for those psychopaths if that synthetic life had some level of intelligence? Here is what five researchers have to say about that.

2.5 Intelligent response Smart hydrogel is a kind of material that can perceive small physical/chemical stimuli (such as temperature,light, magnetism, pH) and make significant response behaviors.[65]Because of this intelligence, hydrogel has a fascinating application prospect in tissue engineering, drug-controlled release and soft actuators. Especially, as an external stimulus of stimulus-responsive materials, magnetic field has the advantages of instant action, contactless control and easy integration into electronic devices. Therefore, the research and development of smart MHs has been very active in recent years.[66]

Over the past few decades, tissue engineering has been successfully applied to the repair of various tissues (retinas, ligaments, fats, blood vessels, etc.). With the potential of hydrogel to construct microenvironment, the scaffolds based on multi-functional MHs have attracted much attention due to their intelligence.

We need to keep in mind that all of this can be controlled by AI via cell phones, cell towers and DEW’s.

Folks, this isn’t science fiction. This is transhumanism and it’s happening now.

Dump gmail. Toss your cell phone. Tell your local government to take down cell towers in your neighborhood. Most importantly, detox from nanotech.