119 Comments

"No one complained about what was done at Nuremberg because justice was served."

It was selective justice that was served at Nuremberg. Many German doctors that worked in the camps escaped justice and then brought here because of the knowledge they gained back then. I found out that Japanese doctors and scientists got the same deal. My hope is that one day evert president still living has to face trials on their wars of aggression and human rights violations. The only people who were prosecuted for torture were the ones who followed orders.

Fauci should have faced a trial for his AZT crimes and denying early treatment just like he did during the Rona scam.

WOW thanks for exposing DeSantis. I see people saying that he didn’t push the Rona restrictions on Florida and that he is suing big pharma, but now I have ammunition to debunk that nonsense.

Brilliant essay! This should be mailed to every voter like the pamphlets sent to state voters on what judges and candidates stand for so they can see what is in the candidates skeleton closets!

For anyone who is an Obama fan this is a brilliant expose on his tenure.

"I think future historians are going to look at the Obama presidency and see it as the moment when this new oligarchy merged with the Democratic Party and used the capacities of these new technologies and the power of this new class of people, the oligarchs and their servants, to create a new apparatus of social control."

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/david-garrow-interview-obama

Democrats also merged with the intelligence agencies and the military and their base just accepted it after being against it most of their lives.

Expand full comment

Your comments about Nuremberg are true. I've written about that in the past but didn't want to include too many old links.

Also agree with you about Fauci and Obama.

Expand full comment

I’m glad I read your previous posts because I was wondering why if Trump got the Covid scam rolling why would the deep state want to take him down and then I read about how he was close to Nixon and his UFO ideas and that cleared things up quite nicely. Thanks.

Expand full comment

I wish more people would read that post.

Expand full comment

Because he didn't. Trump vax was THERAPEUTIC HCQ NOT MRNA.

Expand full comment

So you are saying that's not his signature on the EUA or CISA? That he did not endorse Operation Warp Speed? That he did not take the jabs and call them my beautiful vaccines? That he did not pick swamp lords Azar ad Gottieb?

He is, after all, a billionaire. Was he invested in HCQ?

Expand full comment

He was constantly being fed false information on many things.

Expand full comment

wow! trump apologists are out in full force. This was the man that called covid a hoax and said it would be gone in two weeks. he had a witch doctor, fauci, and various other crazies on the media. he not only locked the country down, he facilitated the jabs and gave billions to drug companies using our tax dollars for a "vaccine" where the drug companies had zero liability. he also bragged incessantly about "operation warp speed" and touted the jabs. he is still touting the jabs. to claim he was fed "false information" as a way to excuse one of the most horrific episodes in our country's history is either naive or purposely obtuse.

Expand full comment

Wow, Trump Derangement Syndrome effectively covering up for Biden voters!

Trump vax was THERAPEUTIC HCQ not mRNA. Had Trump not done this the cabal would have completely shut down everything causing many more deaths. In case you were asleep or jabbed, Trump was constantly fed false information and was fighting DS from the day he was elected. "One of the most horrific episodes in our country's history" was the day DJT left office and FJB and his illegal henchman walked in to seize power. So go back to sleep, nothing to see here. Talk about naive, it just willfully ignorant.

Expand full comment

Hmmm. I'm trying to determine how you come to the conclusion that because someone criticizes Trumps questionable record on covid that that means they voted for the other uniparty candidate, Biden. Speaking for myself, I haven't voted for a uniparty presidential candidate in nearly 40 years.

Expand full comment

Are you saying that Trump did NOT sign the EUA for the mRNA vaccines? And why did he hire and not fire Fauci?

Expand full comment

And he either wasn't smart enough to notice or went along with it all knowingly.

Even to this day...

Expand full comment

Bingo.

Expand full comment

FUCK YOU AND YOUR JEWISH GOD . . . FIGHT YOUR OWN WARS, YOU FILTHY FUCKING KIKE

Expand full comment

so if he was an idiot why would one want him as president? and if he went along with this horror show, why would one want him to be president?

Expand full comment

Read my reply above. Believe what they want you to. Trump never said ANY of that. It's BS.

Expand full comment

Just curious... never said any of what?

Expand full comment

Sorry, I was responding to a different post.

Expand full comment

I’m reading your older links now. I usually do if someone thinks they are important enough to include in their posts.

Expand full comment

This nation was founded by Freemasons, who serve their Jesuit masters. The Jesuits are called by another name in the Bible:

Synagogue of Satan

They are Talmudic Jews that serve the god of this world, Lucifer...not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel)

They’re not part of the 12 tribes of Israel, they aren’t Hebrews, nor are they real Jews. They’re the descendants of Ashkenaz, thus the term Ashkenazi Jews. However, if you ignore all of their claims, and just go open a Bible...here is what it says about Ashkenaz, and his descendants.

Genesis 9:18-19 (KJV) 18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham [is] the father of Canaan. 19 These [are] the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.

Genesis 10:1-5 (KJV) 1 Now these [are] the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. 2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. 4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. 5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

Notice the word Gentiles above? Me too! Ashkenazi Jews aren’t Jews at all, they’re gentiles according to the Bible.

Nevertheless, these are the bastards ruling the nation of Israel to this day, posing as real Jews, and these are the bastards that nobody can speak out against without being called a racist, Nazi, anti-Semite.

Never-mind that the term is supposed to refer to anyone opposed to the descendants of Shem. It has nothing to do with the descendants of Japheth. (Gentiles)

Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Don’t be fooled by these luciferians.

These are the globalists like Soros and Kissinger, the Rothschild and Rockefeller’s...these are the same globalists who control Roman Catholicism.

That obelisk in Vatican City can be found in Rome, MARYland too! Oops, they call it Washington D.C. now, to hide the truth from the stupid Goyim.

That nimrod obelisk symbolism originated from Babylon, and Columbia (as in district of Columbia) is just another name for Semiramis, the Queen of Heaven and Babylon, and wife of Nimrod.

Luke 8:17 (KJV)

For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither [any thing] hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.

I’m doing my best to expose these liars!

https://imgur.com/a/o2jLgQv

Ever question why obelisk symbolism can be found everywhere?

https://imgur.com/a/IiqYX0B

Ever question why our country is littered with freemasonry symbolism?

https://imgur.com/a/rnqVFhC

Look at the symbolism, and connect the dots.

This nation has always been under the control of these Jesuits/globalist/fake Jews/synagogue of Satan.

Voting in any election is futile, both parties are different arms of the same enemy. Israel’s past prime minister, Sharon...once commented to a journalist that the role of the United States President was to carry out the will of the people of Israel.

Nobody even batted an eyelid over this comment.

Politicians are all involved with occult societies and are nothing more than actors playing their part. Liars and deceivers.

Obama has been running the show behind the scenes for awhile now, and whoever is put into office next will be another puppet for Obama. That’s right 3rd generation CIA puppet Obama.

And the CIA is nothing more than a Vatican spy agency for these luciferians that call themselves Jews. They have nodes everywhere...CIA, Mossad, KGB, etc...

All report back to their Jesuit overlords.

The Bible was correct all along, and what we are seeing firsthand is the Beast System establishing itself out in the open.

Voting won’t change what’s in store for all of humanity. God’s Word has already revealed the future.

Expand full comment

I always appreciate your take on these issues William.

As I tried to make clear in the post, what I'm hoping the 2024 race will do is open up the debate. If some of the candidates are on a stage with all the eyes of the world upon them and they start talking about some of these issues, how is that be a bad thing? Granted, its questionable whether any of the candidates I talked about today will do that, but some of the ones in my next post will likely do so.

Expand full comment

It’s not a bad thing, Kyle, except that it gives hope, false hope.

Psalms 118:8 (KJV) [It is] better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.

Second Thessalonians, chapter 2 talks about a strong delusion that is coming up on the world that will ensnare everyone who rejects the truth of God’s word for anything else.

This includes all of those so-called Sunday church goers, who still think they live on a globe earth, spinning through outer space, this was given to you by NASA, not Genesis, chapter 1.

People can’t ride the fence anymore, the days are approaching where you hole be forced to stand with God, or to align yourself against Him. We will all be tried to determine where are true loyalty lies.

The vast majority of humanity will choose the wrong side, and therefore perish, I don’t plan on being part of that group.

Expand full comment

You may be surprised that I also have a problem with the concept of hope, although a different problems than what you describe.

As for the coming strong delusion, look at all the Sunday church goers who took the jabs, or who support a proxy war in Ukraine which may lead to nuclear war, or who believe in AI... and so on.

Expand full comment

Did you see that image that I posted in the comments above? I took that a few days ago just before the sun came up, Oklahoma City is littered with churches that have occult symbolism all over them.

Sunday church goers probably mean well, but they are about as blind as a person could possibly be.

I could literally write a post about all of the deceptions going on with that entire scene , in fact, I just might do that.

Expand full comment

This article sums up a lot about that topic:

Well worth 5 minutes of your time. Has me in tears every-time I read it.

https://prayerandprophecy.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/the-question-that-changed-my-life/

Expand full comment

Saw the photos. Bizarre.

Good read. Thanks.

Expand full comment

I’ve prayed my entire life Time to have eyes to see the truth, and for God to not allow me to be deceived. God has granted me that prayer request, but with it comes a great responsibility to open my mouth, and to reveal the liars and deceivers.

The things I say, are very easy to mock and criticize, but if somebody truly seeks the truth, they will realize that it is one of the hardest things to find, especially in today’s world.

My intellect has not revealed anything to me, rather my passion for truth. Many of the educated types will rely on their own intellect in order to save them selves from the disasters approaching, I’m telling everybody reading this right now, your intellect will not save you.

This might:

Psalm 34:8 (KJV)

O taste and see that the LORD [is] good: blessed [is] the man [that] trusteth in him.

Psalms 33:18-22 (KJV) 18 Behold, the eye of the LORD [is] upon them that fear him, upon them that hope in his mercy; 19 To deliver their soul from death, and to keep them alive in famine. 20 Our soul waiteth for the LORD: he [is] our help and our shield. 21 For our heart shall rejoice in him, because we have trusted in his holy name. 22 Let thy mercy, O LORD, be upon us, according as we hope in thee.

Expand full comment

How do you reconcile that men decided what is in the bible and what isn't?

This is the problem I have with Romans and Thomas. Romans gives power to the church and Thomas takes it away. The men were told to add Romans and take out Thomas by Constantine so that he could use that power to rule.

Expand full comment

This is an issue I have written about before. What we know as the Bible was compiled from a myriad different early Christian writings that existed in the first 3 to 4 centuries after the crucifixion. And it was Constantine's hand picked "bishops" at the two councils of Nicaea that chose which made it into the Bible and which did not.

Expand full comment

Kyle, you and Mr. Brown (above) can't have it both ways; if you're saying that the Bible we have today isn't trustworthy (because it was "canonized" under the "corrupt motivations" of the Emperor Constantine), then Mr. Brown is wasting his time quoting scriptures to us (from the King James Version, which is several centuries old, and has a few passages that have been updated with the attested Dead Sea Scrolls texts discovered mid-20th century)...

...and remember, EVERY English language Bible is a TRANSLATION of the original Hebrew and Greek (and some Aramaic) texts; therefore we are already reading these texts second hand - AND - they were originally written to a different audience (either ancient Israel or the early church); we are not the original audience; therefore we need to be careful that we don't interpret them as though they were written about our specific historical situation today.

Does God still speak through scripture? Absolutely! I believe that, or I wouldn't be a Christian minister. I believe that the scriptures in their original languages are the authoritative Word of God (and of the Living Word, Jesus Christ), and that we can hear God speak through careful modern translations into other languages. But we need to interpret carefully and accurately regarding its original message to its original audience BEFORE we start appropriating it and applying it to our lives and our world today.

And I'm one of those pastors who did NOT take the shots and does NOT buy into any of our current gub'ment's criminal nonsense. Thanks for listening.

Expand full comment

No, I never said the Bible we have today is not trustworthy. Of course it is. I wouldn't be talking about some of the things I talk about here if it wasn't.

However, I agree with you, we need to be careful in our interpretation.

We also need to recognize that a lot of good writing was left out of the Bible. The Dead Sea scrolls are not the only validation of Biblical writings - there is also the Nag Hamadi scrolls which, verify both Biblical writings and the Dead Seas scrolls. Christianity is rich with history, spirituality and the teachings of Jesus.

Expand full comment

Here are a few pictures to get the wheels turning...

https://imgur.com/a/joe5gMb

https://imgur.com/a/nO6aJfX

Xbox- Symbol for Synagogue of Satan

Expand full comment

The Talmud was written by KHAZARIAN MAFIA WHO ARE JEWS therefore there are NO TALMUDIC JEWS.

Expand full comment

I disagree. They call themselves Jews, but are liars. I already proved this via the Bible.

Expand full comment

Of course they call themselves Jews. They are great deceivers. So what are you disagreeing with? They re-write Bibles.

Expand full comment

I think we are both on the same page, it’s just that all of the labels these people are called seem to have different meanings for alot of us.

For example. Since most people assume a Jew, is a Hebrew…then calling these people Jews isn’t correct.

Calling them fake Jews sheds more light, but there are many names we could identify them as.

Edomites, Khazarians, Jews, fake Jews, luciferians, sodomites, scribes and Pharisees, synagogue of Satan, Ashkenazi (fake) Jews, Jesuits, Talmudic Jews; zionists, Serpent Seed, tares, etc…

Expand full comment

It is a complex issue, but I'm glad you and others are trying to sort it out.

Expand full comment

Just hate being deceived, and want to see things for how they really are.

Liars and deceivers are the most vile and wicked people among us, and Freemasons check both boxes, as well as their Jesuit overlords.

Expand full comment

Who am I? Nobody. But I think your summing up of our republican candidates is very fair.

I too, out of all, like Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai the best.

Another point in his favor...he was an untouchable. And is a smart lawyer (even though he isn't).

Expand full comment

Thank you Duchess.

Expand full comment

He's a fraud.

Expand full comment

I am completely anti-political as I see government as the cause of all problems and the solution to none of them. This is by design. I also see voting as the consent needed for our government to rule over us. Power is derived from the consent of the governed. I don't like to feed power to the government, thus I do not vote and never will.

However, the only candidate in my lifetime that has given me even a glimmer of hope is RFK Jr.

Expand full comment

I understand. But as I've mentioned a number of times, I see a good opportunity to bypass a lot of censorship by having the eyes of the world upon those few candidates on the debate stage talking about issues that I and many others have been censored for talking about over the past 3 years, including RFK and others.

Expand full comment

I feel the exact same way, and it honestly amazes me how blind everybody else is to the entire left right paradigm in this country

Expand full comment

Thank you for another well researched and generously linked post Kyle.

Your opening statement, "one overarching issue that candidates need to deal with above all others - the past three years of corruption, tyranny, globalism, murder and mayhem that has taken place", is my opinion (exactly), as well.

And this is a delicious line, "Currently, Good simply means considerably better than Ugly and somewhat better than Bad."

Looking forward to your opinion of Cornell West - who I presume is another HUGE disappointment to me, but I haven't had interest enough to research. (Is it true he "called Fauci a “real life superhero” and the Green Party supports- STILL SUPPORTS- Covid vaccine mandates?!)

That's how tired I've become of the clear charade of US politics after observing at least 7 completely fraudulent elections as they happened, at the state and national levels.

Yes to decentralization!

Yes to local and State.

Yes to the Feds going back to doing nothing except helping the US Postal Service run well.

Expand full comment

Lots to say about CW. Lots more to say overall.

Thank you jill.

Expand full comment

Jill wrote:

"Yes to decentralization!

Yes to local and State.

Yes to the Feds going back to doing nothing except helping the US Postal Service run well."

I doubt there's any hope of the USPS EVER running well...

But I agree that decentralization and "neuter-ization" of the Federal gub'ment by States taking back their power (whether Washington agrees or not) is the answer; I think States should just overwrite Federal laws and then turn away Federal funds - since the Fed will use that as a carrot/threat.

I also believe the only way to stop Biden's and the Democrats' insanity and destruction is for a few (6-8?) Red State governors to "grow a pair" and take military action against Washington: send in your guard units and clean out the D.C. sewer - and I mean EVERY CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS and THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.

Then hold new, paper ballot, photo I.D. elections to replace these vermin with persons honestly elected by We The People. Abolish the 17th Amendment and return to the Founder's intention for "electing" Senators. Remove all the "power agencies" from Washington. Every Senator and Congressman/woman has their salary paid by THEIR OWN STATE; NO Federal salaries for our Representatives.

Abolish the 16th Amendment. SHUT DOWN THE I.R.S. forever. Raise all Federal taxes from imports into our country. States shall only raise taxes through a state sales tax. PERIOD.

Is that workable? It used to be; it will work again once we shut down all the welfare agencies, and PHASE OUT SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE and MEDICAID. The Federal government was never supposed to be our nanny or the teat we suck on!

Expand full comment

I agree with all of that.

I would add that election day be a holiday and that all voting be done on that day only.

I would also add that the FBI, the CIA, and all of the agencies under HHS be dissolved.

To stop the revolving doors between congress and the corporate world, I would also add that elected officials cannot go into the corporate world until 10 years after leaving office.

Furthermore, members of congress cannot be invested in any regulated sector.

Expand full comment

Love this whole plan RevMikeyMac!

And I've been hollering (into the wind) about HAND COUNTED, paper ballot, photo I.D. elections

for at least 4 decades.

I would vote you in as overseeing your entire agenda if possible.

Expand full comment

I’m a faithful voter and am always surprised when my candidate or issue wins. However, life is too short and valuable to waste time on politics or politicians. Our elected representatives do not represent us. How could they when half of the constituents want him to do A and the other half want B. And I don’t want a politician who polls his constituents, and does what the majority want him to do, unless it conflicts with what will further the best interests of himself. And I certainly don’t want a politician who does what his CONSCIENCE tells him to do. In this case, his CONSCIENCE is an euphemism for what will further his own best interests. Caveat: If the politician is up for reelection, he will do what the majority of his constituents want him to do, and square matters with his CONSCIENCE when he’s safely back in office.

I will be voting for RFK jr – his ‘baggage’ is irrelevant. He is the sole candidate (as DeSantis is not) who can be relied on to do everything in his power as the President of the US to stop and reverse the damage virology and the vaccine makers have inflicted on Americans since the phony Polio Plague in the early 1950s. NO more mandatory vaccines. And MAYBE, to stop the fear of viruses and the resulting govt tyranny, and to stop the deaths and disabilities from vaccines, a public debate will ensue pitting the Germ Theory against the Terrain Theory. In the public debate, the most important questions to be asked and answered is WHAT CAUSES DISEASE and WHAT CAN WE DO TO HELP OURSELVES BE HEALTHY.

Speaking of virology, Dr. Mark Bailey has this to say: https://www.scribd.com/document/633334195/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition

Don’t be alarmed by the words ‘Expert Edition.’ I had no difficulty with 95% of this essay, and, as someone who 3 years ago didn’t know the difference between a germ and a virus, I’m certifiably no expert.

Expand full comment

And then there's 5G, which Kennedy is opposed to because it's causing neuro disabilities for humans as well as killing all other living creatures. Some of the lawsuits CHD has initiated support the hope that as President he will order the telecommunication industry (and FCC) to PROVE that 5G etal are not harmful. Of course, 5G (and the Gs that went before) have already been proved to be harmful, and the harms have been known and documented and published for decades. And ignored by govt for decades. But as President, Kennedy will have the power to compel the industry to stop its out-of-control mania to blanket the earth with cell towers and the skies with satellites.

And then there's the elephant-sized problem of cutting the umbilical cord that is attached from the smartphone to the fingers of its addicted users. Presumably the populace KNOWS about the dangers, so do they NOT care that their health is being assaulted and their lifespan shortened? Convincing them that cellphones are worse than eating twinkies and that to Save The Planet they need to toss their smartphone into the dumpster may be Mission Impossible.

Expand full comment

you are so right. it is akin to smoking cigarettes. it says right on the package that it will give you cancer and/or kill you. in some countries there are horrible pictures showing what will happened to your mouth, lungs, etc. it is all about instant gratification as opposed to the long term problems. a lot of humans are all about the former and don't care about the latter.

Expand full comment

The only thing you left out is that neither side wants any politician to do 95% of the crap he does. No one wants war, we get endless war. No one wants handouts to quasi monopolies, small business and the middle class has been destroyed by them. No one wants 6 billion tons of glyphosate and plastics permeating every square millimeter of the planet poisoning the earth each year and they determined that carbon is the only environmental issue that matters. No one wants free money handed to banks in order to create hedge funds with tens of trillions in assets that control every corporation on earth and that's exactly what we get.

Half the people argue with the other half over crap the elite don't give a damn about. That's the only difference between the two sides.

Expand full comment

Astute points.

Expand full comment

A song about the fraud of Virology. Listen to THE DISH. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish

Expand full comment

I like it!

Expand full comment

Lucky you. I've never had a presidential candidate I voted for win.

Yes, it can all seem like a waste of time and resources. But as I've pointed out here several times, I'm looking forward to some really dirty laundry being aired in the debates. Maybe that'll open up the conversation to some who are still asleep.

And to think Mark and Sam are New Zealanders... given how bad things were there.

Expand full comment

Regarding Kennedy, be prepared to lose the 2nd amendment right and be left helpless to defend yourself. He's a liberal at heart. The DC cabal will destroy him and his family too. It's already happening and Xiden has denied Kennedy the benefit of Secret Service protection. Let that sink in for a minute. The CIA has already murdered his Uncle, why should they stop there?

Expand full comment

Kennedy, in the article you refer to, is only saying he won't take people's guns. It does not say he won't try other methods to try to control "gun violence". The democommie regime firmly entrenched in DC has certainly found other way to attack the 2nd amendment. Nothing is this article says Kennedy won't do the same.

Expand full comment

Boomer - Many people say things here I disagree with, but they do so in a civil manner. I removed two of your comments below because you resort to ad hominem attacks and name calling. I've never banned anyone from commenting here but if you keep this up you will be the first.

Expand full comment

I remember similar things being said when Obama got elected (as I've pointed out here numerous times, I never voted for him). In fact, I was looking to get a gun about the time Obama got elected but all the fear mongering over what he might do with guns caused their price to skyrocket, out of my reach. By the way, thanks for that.

And yet, Obama never took away anyone's guns.

In spite of now having a candidate who is saying your gun rights are protected, we are now seeing the same fear mongering bullhooey with that candidate, with zero proof that he will do anything like that. Your fear mongering will only succeed at driving the price of guns out of the reach of those who need them most. Please stop. If he gets in and does do something, then you can whine and moan all you want. You might even want try to actually do something to stop him at that point. But don't place the burden on low income folks with unproven speculation.

Expand full comment

Agreed. RFK won't take guns, but will endorse and pass all sorts of licensing and registration schemes so that the next presidential administration can easily do the confiscation dirty work.

RFK needs to be appointed Secretary of Health in a presidential cabinet, and not an elected position, where he might be able to do some good against the big pharma/AMA mafia, as well as non-organic, toxic agriculture.

Expand full comment

In the event that RFK jr should get elected President, I sure hope that the Republicans are totally in control of Congress. Democrats, and even some Republicans, cannot be trusted to do proper gun and crime control legislation, as the devil is in the details.

Expand full comment

Right now I see no pathway for RFK to get into the White House. The Dem superdelegates can deny candidates and hand select others - which is what they did in the last election to oust Sanders and bring in Biden.

As I'm sure you know, the establishment Dems hate RFK. I'm not sure what he thinks he's doing.

As for congress, I see it going VERY Republican.

Expand full comment

Above all, RFK cares about the Constitution most. If he does anything about guns, it will be about grabbing illegal guns being used illegally, which is the only necessary gun control.

Expand full comment

Hello "Sixway", I've been following gun control issues since the JFK assassination, and in 1971 I joined the NRA, and a year later in 1972, I renewed as a life member and have donated to them via the ~1976 Congress requirement financial accountability for the ILA (NRA Institute for Legislative Action) and the PVF (NRA Political Victory Fund) whenever/wherever I could afford to, ever since. During those 50+ years, I have seen countless political gungrabber wananbes that the NRA warned me/us about and mostly defeated, either in a Congressional vote or for re-election, so I've become very "gun shy", pun intended.

There are a lot of political types out there that want to "care" about the Constitution, but it's always a matter of HOW they "care", which is why we have a SCOTUS. Be cautious and assume nothing. Here is a "good" example of how these gun control freaks can get when they get their way, where I grew up in my first 32 years in NJ. https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/retired-nj-teacher-faces-prison-time-for-possession-of-flintlock-pistol/

Expand full comment

I totally understand what you are saying and I agree with you regarding typical politicians, but RFK is not one of those types. He has common sense and wants to solve problems, not only go after law abiding citizens' guns while ignoring gangs, the border crisis and the CIA's involvement in gun trafficking.

Expand full comment

Maybe even shut down the CIA, which no other candidate is talking about doing.

Expand full comment

God promised to preserve His Word, and I think this has been done in a very clever manner. The enemies of God probably feel as if they are intelligent, but God uses their own intellect against them.

The following verses come to mind:

Psalms 2:1-4 (KJV) 1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, [saying], 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

The Dead Sea scrolls come to mind. I think that they could’ve possibly been preserved there for thousands of years, as a way to verify modern scripture.

Gnosticism was something that originated in Babylon, was carried down through the centuries by the scribes and Pharisees after leaving captivity, took a pit stop in Egypt along the way…

Eventually, all of this occult knowledge was written down in the Talmud. They have since used these writings to usurp the Torah, and deceive the entire world into believing lies.

In the book of acts, chapter 2, we see the beginning of the church of Jesus Christ. 3000 souls from all over the known world at that time were converted in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit came down, and men began speaking in tongues.

Acts 2:36-41 (KJV) 36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. 37 Now when they heard [this], they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men [and] brethren, what shall we do? 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, [even] as many as the Lord our God shall call. 40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation. 41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls.

These people dispersed and set up random churches throughout the known-world at the time. As the apostles would write letters to these churches, what ended up becoming the new testament in our modern day bibles, was a collection of those letters that were saved and shared among different churches. The letters to Corinth became 1&2 Corinthians, the letter to the church in Ephesus became the book of Ephesians, etc…

These letters were collected in basically two places, one was Antioch Syria, and the other was Alexandria Egypt, since that was the scholarly city of the known world back in those days.

What you ended up with is what we call the Textus Receptus or the received texts from Antioch, and what is now referred to as the Septuagint from Alexandria Egypt.

The Dead Sea Scrolls verify the received texts, being almost identical to them, while the Septuagint is full of errors and contradictions….and it is my understanding that these errors were done intentionally by scholars (scribes and Pharisees) that were purposely trying to edit and corrupt the true word of God.

The gnosticism that came out of Babylon established itself in Egypt specifically Alexandria, and from there began infiltrating into the church of Jesus Christ.

There were many gnostic, books written that were added to scripture. However, the people in those days rejected them because they knew that they were not authentic. The gospel of Thomas and many other apocryphal books are perfect examples of gnostic doctrines that were snuck into the Scriptures by these wicked men. Of course, this is debatable by many, as to which are inspired, and which aren’t. This is why we are to study to show ourselves approved unto God. When one rightly divides the Word of Truth, it becomes clear what belongs and what doesn’t.

Galatians 2:4 (KJV) And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:

Even in the beginning days of the church, the infiltrating of false brethren had already begun.

This eventually led to these scribes and Pharisees manipulating the church from the shadows, while Constantine, the pagan Caesar and Pontifex Maximus declared himself Pope over all of Christianity and the church.

That title to this very day is held by the papacy. It was a title used to describe the Priest of Dagon. The papacy also holds the title of Caesar to this very day. And the pope is a Jesuit. Funny how things come full circle. They aren’t even trying to hide their agenda anymore, must be close to the end game scenario if their (fake) Jew world order.

The real church of Jesus Christ went underground at this point, and Roman Catholicism was birthed. A counterfeit of the real thing, but based on the Paganism and Gnosticism of ancient Babylon. This is why in Vatican City, you can find many pagan and occult symbols, including the obelisk, which represents the phallax of Nimrod, king of Babylon. And the Womb of Columbia, otherwise known as Semiramis, queen of heaven.

Roman Catholicism is still to this day, controlled by the Jesuits, who are really those exact same scribes, and Pharisees, who claim to be Jews, but are of the synagogue of Satan according to the Bible.

I’m getting a little off topic here so I will wrap this up. There is more than enough information available for people to answer the question for themselves whether or not the Bible is the true authentic word of God. This is, indeed, one of the most important questions a person could ask themselves as the Bible is either the foundation upon which everything rests, or it’s just a silly book of fables for religious zealots to control the populations of the world.

Ask God to reveal the truth to you, and then go looking for it.

Luke 8:17 (KJV) For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither [any thing] hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.

Proverbs 28:5 (KJV)

Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all [things].

Expand full comment

All good points Kyle...Thanks for sharing your keen perspectives

Expand full comment

Thank you Tom.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your great article. I learned some things I had never heard or considered before.

As far as Ramaswamy, I’m not convinced that he is for centralization just because he was CEO. While do agree that corporations have morphed into power hungry destroyers of freedom, I do not feel that someone that works for one is guilty of all corporate evils. I would have to learn more about his companies and products before dismissing him just because he was in biotech. I like his messages about restoring the constitutional republic and limiting the power of the federal government.

Expand full comment

Yes, they all say a few things that we can agree with.

I'll come back to do a more in depth look at each of them.

Expand full comment

Kyle, in all honesty, i am wondering if the entire idea we call 'elections' - and thus discussion of candidates - has even the slightest of validity. Don't get me wrong, i too am pondering the merits and de-merits of one or the other of them.

But might it not be a mere Roman style show of bread and games (with the bread getting more and more rationed the further we go) in which We The People are nothing but the faceless masses intended to be manipulated by the illusion of being given a choice. Do we? Do we have any real choice in any election ... regardless of nationality? I wonder ... And if we come to the sobering conclusion that we might not have that choice, then what really ARE our true choices as sovereign human beings? I think soUlutions might more effectively be found when thinking in that direction. And i know that you are already LIVING those solutions to a degree way beyond most of us including myself. Brightest Blessings 🌟

Expand full comment

I have to agree with your basic premise Naraya. But as I've tried to point out in this and the other linked posts, what I'm really hoping for with this election is that the needle be moved a little more in the right direction. I believe much of that can be accomplished in the debates by having some well informed, mostly honest candidates talk about some of the issues that have been censored by the legacy media for the past 3 years. I'll be writing more about some of those candidates in my next post.

Expand full comment

Yes, i can see those debates potentially being of benefit. At least one prominent candidate talks pretty straight on a lot of the Plandemonicum issues. I guess you'll write about him in your next post and look forward to reading that.

Expand full comment

Yup.

Expand full comment

Ayyadurai has some good aspects, but like you say - in his heart, he's a technocrat. Possibly intending for us to become a decentralized technocratic society, but we all know that it won't remain that way in the long run. The rest of the technocrats are hell-bent (perhaps I should say 8th Sphere bent) on centralized control over all of us, and they might seem to go along with Ayyadurai for a little while, as a ruse - but they will kick his ass to the curb and take over with a vengeance as soon as they can...

Expand full comment

Ok, I'm biting. 8th Sphere...?

Expand full comment

LOL, that's gonna be a big mouthful - better sharpen your teeth first :)

Shorthand - 8th sphere is basically an archonic matrix, where you do not want to get trapped... Here's a few links to get you started.

Rudolph Steiner Archive (one of many papers/lectures)

https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA203/English/19210313p02.html

Rudolf Steiner's Prophecies for the 21st Century: Anti-Spiritual Vaccines, Ahriman and the Technocratic Endgame by Steve Crimi

https://www.academia.edu/attachments/65732018/download_file?s=portfolio

Steve 's (excellent) guest podcast appearances can be found here, now that his YT channel is censored https://logosophiabooks.com/podcasts/

https://www.thecenterforsophiologicalstudies.com/post/the-god-of-the-technocrats

https://m.vk.com/@secretxgovernment-the-eighth-sphere-xtention-of-xtinction

Expand full comment

you want the facts about Dr. Shiva...talk and listen to Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. As for the rest of the republican candidates, you are more partial to the deep state puppets funded by Wall Street. So you want more years of McConnell/Paul Ryan style Congress. Good luck with that. You clearly have not grasped the concept of the uni-party and the illusion they present of you actually having a choice. Wake up.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure how you come to the conclusion that I'm partial to deep state republican candidates when I just just gave them all an ugly or bad rating.

You clearly have never read my earlier posts where I often called the two party system a uniparty.

I'm open to hearing more about Dr. Shiva.

About choice... As someone who has been widely censored for speaking the truth the past few years, I'm less concerned about parties and more interested in using the race as an opportunity to bypass the censorship that has prevailed the past few years.

You will want to read y next post.

Expand full comment

Censorship is courtesy of the uni-party of which DJT does not belong but yet you dislike him the most. Should anyone but Trump win in 2024, censorship will be the least of your worries. You will have zero privacy, no personal property, rent everything, live in a 15-minute city in your 300 sq. ft hovel, pushed to a non-meat diet, be monitored for your ESG which will determine your monthly basic income. Your money will not be your own and you will have no freedom in choosing how you spend the money the state gives you. If you're a Christian or go against the approved state narrative, be prepared to be sued for hate speech. All goals of the globalists due to be achieved by 2030.

Dr. Gottlieb submitted his resignation in March 2019 and left the next month...but do indeed focus on his short term role and ignore long term role Dr. Peter Navarro who's economic policies fueled a thriving economy. I agree with your criticism of Azar...he gave the sweetheart deal to Epstein.

Expand full comment

I cant say I dislike Trump more than the others. What I can say is that I've had a lot more time to learn about what he'll actually do in the White House compared to the others. And he did a lot of things to destroy freedom and take away our rights.

Why did Trump bring in those swamp creatures when he said he was going to do the opposite?

Why did he sign the EUA into law that took away so many freedoms and killed so many?

Why did he push Operation warp speed to get the DoD bioweapon jabs going asap?

Why did he sign the unconstitutional CISA into law that has enabled much of this censorship?

Why did he take the jabs and brag about his beautiful vaccines and lobby for big pharma?

Expand full comment

Ask Mike Pence about the covid response...he was in charge of it. Trump has made it clear he disliked Fauci & Birx. What happened to Trump when he talked about alternative therapies...do you remember? What happened to Trump when he trief to fight the deep state....he got impeached twice. The msm lied every day of the Mueller investigation. The RNC & it's rinos were more than happy to work across the aisle to try thwart every action Trump took that threatened their power. Look at the turnover of personnel in his admin....how many deep staters made their way into his admin only to be fired when their agenda was to subvert Trump & not support him.

Expand full comment

I agreed with your prior post but disagree with your Trump defense. Trump was President. He could have gotten rid of Fauci and Birx. His charming son-in-law convinced him that he would lose the election if he shook up the Covid response. Kyle is dead right about Trump on Covid.

Expand full comment

Here's a different opinion that explains why Trump wanted to but could not fire Fauci.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-threatens-fire-fauci-rift-disease-57c804db048aa7f1c99f227b495f52e6

Expand full comment

I think this proves my statement.

Expand full comment

Did you really read the article? Here's a direct quote....."Trump cannot directly fire Fauci, who is not a presidential appointee." Also read the 2nd article I posted,...it says the same.

Expand full comment

He could have removed him from his White House role. I know he could not fire Fauci, a federal employee protected by Civil Service. When Fauci spoke from the White House podium, that gave the impression he was speaking for the Trump Administration. Trump could (and should) have stopped that. I know Fauci was (is) a media darling, and he would still have had unfettered access to broadcast his Covid lies. But not from the White House.

Expand full comment

In a perfect world that would have been possible, but not in the political environment of that time. You can Monday morning quarterback all you want but Trump put Pence in charge of covid response, so why keep dumping this on Trump...put it where it belongs...on Pence. Fauci was a 40 year federal employee who's salary was more than the President's. He was firmly entrenched in DC. He was never held to account for his deadly mishandling of the AIDS drug AZT. Do you honestly think the deep state operatives surrounding Trump would have allowed Fauci to be removed from the daily briefings? The backlash and media criticism of anything Trump did against the establishment subjected him to overwhelming amounts of ridicule, criticism, and backstabbing. Fauci had all the backing and support of Congress, the media, the so-called medical professionals, big pharma and the deep state bureaucracy, who would protect him no matter what. Trump didn't stand a chance of removing him the daily press briefings and Pence, who was nothing but controlled opposition, didn't have the desire to do it either. Trump was screwed either way...if he removed Fauci from the WH daily briefings he would have been accused of not "following the science", sidelining the most esteemed "Dr." from the NIH, and failing to deliver a clear message to inform the public of the government's response to this crisis. Remember fear was rampant and promoted via the federal and state propaganda media. Trump tried to bring in a voice of reason in Dr. Scott Atlas and how did that go?

Expand full comment

Beg to differ with your findings..........

President Donald J. Trump's Accomplishments List:

https://www.magapill.com/

Extensive List of Trump Administration Accomplishments

https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/extensive-list-of-trump-administration-accomplishments/

Expand full comment

Hello Kyle: Agree with your take on the Republicans running . Bur Dr. Shiva is out because ALMOST no Techie outside of Steve Kirsch is capable of loving and preserving the human element needed to preserve human society. Removing all the 5G towers and other harmful "Smart" tech is not in these types. They can't do it.

If RFK Jr. is shown the actual J6 footage and "2000 Mules" and is given more information as he says, "...he will change." As for Israel being a purist here makes no sense. Who do you think aided in killing JFK and his father??? He has no choice but to toe the line, and he still may be assassinated!

GREATEST HOPE: RFK, JR. ~K. Christensen

Expand full comment

Is Kirsch running? You may be right about their inability to let go of some of their precious tech. It is to them their savior, their religion.

RFK sticks his head out on a number of issues, I'm surprised he doesn't when it comes to Israel.

Expand full comment

If you haven't seen the Israel part of RFK's recent interview on The Jimmy Dore Show, youtube, you may want to have a look. I understand that political types have to kiss ''the wall,'' but RFK's drooling all over it. Way, way over the top.

Expand full comment

I like Dore. Do you have a link to that?

Expand full comment

I don't, Kyle. It was a very long interview, covering many different topics, and Jimmy then breaks it up into different segments. One of them being Israel. RFK's good, e.g., on the southern border issue, and others. You can probably find the Israel segment if you search The Jimmy Dore Show channel. I'm not good at linking, tbh, or I certainly would. I appreciate your excellent content. Imo, since you're doing the Good, Bad, Ugly breakdown, you'd want to see this. Towards the end, Jimmy (who admits he's not an expert on Israel,) asks RFK if he'd debate/discuss the issue with Max Blumenthal. RFK says yes. A couple of days later, RFK's press person says no! (The irony there is thick considering the Rogan, RFK, Hotez similar situation!) Then, another couple of days, Jimmy has Max on and they go through the whole RFK interview, point-by-point. Also worth a look, if you can find the time. But, don't neglect the goats!

Expand full comment

The goats do get priority:)

Thanks for the info about the RFK press person. I'll have to look into all of that.

Expand full comment

Kyle, I hate to be a pest, but you gotta see Jimmy Dore absolutely torch Marianne Williamson about her position on Ukraine! Hot off the presses.

Expand full comment

No, I saw it on youtube. ( I need CCs because I'm deaf.) Williamson tried to dance around her support of the Ukraine effort, but Jimmy would have none of it. He just kept hammering her and basically inferred she was just another war pig. I was amazed. I think he's had it with the BS from all these political types, and others, since he was injured from the injection.

Expand full comment

I don't like to use YouTube because Google has not allowed me to comment there since early 2021. Usually creators cross post, meaning the same video can be seen on both platforms. I'll look some more.

Expand full comment

10 4. Same here about commenting.

Expand full comment

Steve Kirsch has started a super pac to support Kennedy's campaign

Expand full comment

I have some problems with Kirsch going back to his initial interview with Malone on the dark horse podcast on June 11 2021.

Expand full comment

Yes! It was Steve who helped convince RFK, Jr. to run and he's a big funder as well.

Expand full comment

Again, RFK, Jr. has no choice re: Israel.

Expand full comment

Mr. Young, I'm a little concerned because someone with my id is posting comments. They are not thoughts that I have. I find it very disconcerting to read comments that I did not write and would not write - all with my id.

Expand full comment

Substack has been getting weird lately. Can you tell me which comments you're referring to?

Expand full comment

How do you want me to identify them?

Expand full comment

Copy and paste them in your reply.

Expand full comment
Error