Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karafree's avatar

Wow Kyle, thank you for putting so many of the Glaring pieces together here in this post. You have pointed out all my greatest concerns, and the many angles that can confuse us. I too have no trust in politicians, and not even RFK.

I know you are not fond of Alison McDowell, but her investigation into RFK's ties to digital currency and blockchain/15minute cities, his stance on the environment could mean more of our freedoms to enjoy Nature being taken from us.

I am someone who is so disgusted and disillusioned with all things political and trust no one, see everything as Players playing their parts for the con-trollers, the DELETES!! that this post covered everything important succinctly and was very helpful! Thank you!

Expand full comment
Larry Cox's avatar

This is the best written analysis of the political situation that I have seen so far.

There seems to be a rule in politics that should be obvious: You don't step on the toes of the people who are supporting your campaign financially.

There are Jewish supporters on both sides of politics. Same goes for big Pharma. However, Mike Adams believes that big Pharma has leaned towards Trump - perhaps as a hedge - which results in Trump going easy on medical drug issues, including vaccines. RFK Jr. had no such scruples. I doubt that his endorsement of Trump in the "battleground" states (who came up with that expression?) will change Trump's position on medical drugs or vaccines.

There are sections of the CIA that operate very similar to the Mafia (if not in direct cooperation with them), and both men have an interest in exposing CIA crimes, so that effort may move forward in spite of the risks involved. I believe that the CIA is also all tied up with the secret space program, which is one reason they let the 1975 revelations go through - as a convenient distraction. But this is conjecture on my part.

Most political issues go deeper than most politicians are aware or willing to talk about. The people care about this. Many with loud voices - but corporate attachments - can't afford to care about this. And so the deeper aspects of these issues never get discussed (or almost never; Courtney Brown's group being one exception). We have seen how deeply political decisions can affect our lives or the lives of people we are connected to (such as in Israel, Gaza, Iran, Ukraine or Russia). So it does behoove us to pay attention, even though the most important information ordinarily remains a secret. Thus, while it may not be worth supporting any one candidate - at least strongly - it is probably worth investigating what motivates the various candidates and, more importantly I think, their support groups. While a lot of these people simply lust for power, or play politics as a game, there is a lot more going on "under the hood."

Oh - I almost forgot to mention that I caught a lot of both conventions, as my girlfriend wanted to see them. The Democrats have constructed a very appealing narrative that will attract many people who aren't really paying attention (which is a LOT of people). With a symbolic "historic first" now in their pocket, they will become very difficult to overcome. When the race was between two (or three) old white guys, there was no special symbology for anyone to hang onto. Now there is. A lot of voters think no further than the meaning of the symbology in the race. Now it is between an old white guy and a less old WOMAN of COLOR. Many voters will think no further than that. Something very big will have to happen to counteract that "magic."

Expand full comment
118 more comments...

No posts